To say that ceremony was canceled is an inaccurate statement per what I found out. No need for people to worry...
I know someone who spoke with the person who is responsible for organizing these events at the court (she has the "day of ceremony" organizing responsibilities). She said it would be inaccurate to say that any ceremony event was canceled this month. Again, no ceremony as a whole was canceled. She said that this week's ceremony is still happening for many people. She said that if someone got de-scheduled, it may be for a reason related to their own file and that the ceremony is still taking place on time at the same place this week for everyone else. She said that no more people will be added to that event as it is considered too late at this point to add more people.
She also said that next ceremonies will take place in June (if nothing changes). She said currently, they are taking more people into the ones in June. She said there are currently two ceremonies in June and both are in the last week of June (she was unable to recall the exact date without looking at her paperwork but she confirmed that both ceremonies were in the last week of June). She said it would be too early to confirm whether they will add more ceremonies in June or not, but for now, there are only two of them which may change.
This is for everyone in the group: Please make sure that your reported information in the group reflects the event and exact words of the status. For example when it says interview will be scheduled, report interview WILL be scheduled (not that you have been scheduled). Another example, when you have been de-scheduled, then report that you have been de-scheduled (not that the whole ceremony has been canceled and then start implying that everyone who got scheduled to that event is now de-scheduled). Exaggerations or added-drama or change of words change the meaning and may sometime make people worry or run into false expectations. Thanks...
I think you have to read the status a little bit more carefully. Mine say 30 days... and it has been saying that for almost 30 days now, but, what it actually says is that I am in line to be scheduled and that the upto 30 days waiting time should be my expectation once they mail me the notice (which they did not do yet).
I think what yours says possibly 45 days after they mail your notice (which they did not do yet because you are in-line to be scheduled). I say that to avoid confusion and false expectations of the readers.
Spouse had interview at Minneapolis office yesterday. Very straightforward. Officer recommended for approval, and this morning USCIS sent notice that an oath has been scheduled. Now a waiting game to see if we get the date in the mail or in the online portal faster!
ashcar14 got a reaction from aa1979 in N400 filers at Minneapolis,MN
ashcar14 got a reaction from Abdi145 in N400 filers at Minneapolis,MN