The_Dude

You must be new to this country, or at least not familiar with American politics.
It should be exclusively about fiscal policy at this point. But it's not, you have the social conservatives holding the party hostage.
Your postings on here have borne that assessment out. Just look at your post that preceded my previous comment. You sound like one of those derps who insist that Obamer is a Muslim trying to take our Liberty. Post something even marginally substantive sometime.

You must be new to this country, or at least not familiar with American politics.
It should be exclusively about fiscal policy at this point. But it's not, you have the social conservatives holding the party hostage.
Your postings on here have borne that assessment out. Just look at your post that preceded my previous comment. You sound like one of those derps who insist that Obamer is a Muslim trying to take our Liberty. Post something even marginally substantive sometime.

You must be new to this country, or at least not familiar with American politics.
It should be exclusively about fiscal policy at this point. But it's not, you have the social conservatives holding the party hostage.
Your postings on here have borne that assessment out. Just look at your post that preceded my previous comment. You sound like one of those derps who insist that Obamer is a Muslim trying to take our Liberty. Post something even marginally substantive sometime.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

If Reagan were running for president today, you would call him a RINO. The republicans of the early to mid-80's is what you should aspire to, not this level of hyper partisanship, focused on social issues.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

Slim, you should consider moving to Somalia, they don't believe in regulations, or helping the poor out, and you practically HAVE to carry a gun to take a dump there. Sounds like paradise for you.
But here in the U.S., we do try and help our citizens out, within reason. You have a choice, you can live in a civilized society, or you can leave. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to stay here.

Carrying a gun with you is a good idea, if you live in Churchill, Manitoba. Not so much if you live in a civilized society. If you have to carry a gun with you, you are either paranoid delusional, or you potentially have to fight polar bears when going to the market.

Carrying a gun with you is a good idea, if you live in Churchill, Manitoba. Not so much if you live in a civilized society. If you have to carry a gun with you, you are either paranoid delusional, or you potentially have to fight polar bears when going to the market.

Because he's being lifted up as if he is some sort of great man, when towards the end of the career he was starting to have a negative effect on the tech industry. He was just another guy, who happened to have an eye for product design.

I guess there is no pleasing the teabaggers. They call you a low life if you lose your job, and then find a new way to insult you if you take a job they don't agree with.

I guess there is no pleasing the teabaggers. They call you a low life if you lose your job, and then find a new way to insult you if you take a job they don't agree with.

How predictable of you Danno. And how completely irrelevant you continue to be.

if YOU noticed in the article that you posted, she was asked. Bolded for the reading comprehension challenged.

[
Disrespect for an elder is not a sensitivity issue. That's crass behavior in any culture.

Funny I wondered the same thing about you. If you act the way you post, I'd be surprised if your wife hasn't tried to kill you at least once.

Being a jackass gets someone an honorary RUB membership?

You have a vendetta with Israel, but what about Jordan who took even more land? Why not at least be honest about your agenda Sofi, this is about your vengeance, not about any homeland.

Exactly, you won't address that because of your vendetta against Israel. Thanks for proving your bias though.
I have, unless by "look it up" you are really asking me to read a distorted account from a biased source that prove your side.
So this isn't about the actual homeland, it's about vengeance.

Except that they did....
Answer my question first. The original land that was part of the Palestine Mandate included mostly what is now Jordan. Why is there no movement to seek that land back as well?

Now why don't you mention anything about the majority of the land which was once within the Palestine Mandate? Most of it is actually Jordan, close to 70%. You focus in on ONLY the land that became Israel, yet I see no claims to Jordan et al.

The long version is, Gary is a political neophyte and has no idea what he is talking about. I don't think it will be an easy re-election, but if you're writting him off now, you have no clue.

I wonder the results of a poll in Mecca asking if they like Americans.