Jump to content

InhaleExhale

Members
  • Content Count

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About InhaleExhale

  • Rank
    Member
  • Member # 349377
  • Location Fresno, CA, USA

Profile Information

  • City
    Fresno
  • State
    California

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. She is confusing emergency recall (which is the made up term her fact-checker "source" came up with and which in itself is a false claim) with emergency use authorization.
  2. There are safe and approved drugs that work very effectively fighting Covid19 especially during early onset.
  3. It's not even only the principle. It's that there is zero data on that someone wearing a mask would actually protect someone else. I have read about 15 mask studies. None of them confirmed that absurd theory. But the health risk for folks like us (not being a surgeon with an explicit OSHA tested and approved mask handling protocol and controlled air conditioning) wearing a mask is well documented.
  4. You WANT others to do as YOU wish. For a reason that you can neither explain nor cite any applicable scientific data for. I am not sure where you are getting this perceived entitlement from but we are all individualistic human beings that have autonomy over our own bodies. We assess each our own risk/benefit ratio and make our own decisions. Some of us read science and some don't. The ones who don't cannot explain why they claim certain things but they keep claiming them.
  5. Yes, for a reason that escapes my comprehension skills, it seems like it is only about the narrative, but not about science anymore. Observing this happening on the entire planet right on front of my eyes... I do now much better grasp how the horrific things that happened 80+ years ago, could actually happen. I am looking at living proof how easily people are able to be manipulated 😕 I think it was Mark Twain who said “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
  6. I agree and would add that to work toward that goal the focus should be to believe nothing and start applying critical thinking skills and researching medical literature. Instead of blindly believing MSM, or alleged fact-checkers or even your physician, unless the physician has informed themselves which most have not.
  7. What do you mean by "if shown"? Do you have a reference that it has been "shown"? I don't. There was certainly nothing in the trial protocols that evaluated anything like that to my knowledge but you might know better if you did read the trial protocols. That's a good point to have, but without doing the proper safety trials to rule out the known concerns the value of the point becomes moot. Plus, it is a given that there are unknown unknowns as with every experiment and despite that they claim that "the vaccine is safe". When it's clear as a day that no one is actually able to know whether it is safe given the lack of data and lack of time. What it is, is unnecessary and risky. Where are you getting this from? What about the side effect of death or heart inflammation? Do you seriously belief this is evidence that the immune system is "getting to work" to prepare the body to fight the Covid19 disease? And in some cases (=thousands!) it can lead to death. And in some other cases (tens or even hundreds of thousands) it can lead to life long injuries with no possibility to even recoup the costs. People are dying and suffering serious side effects ... pregnant women suffer miscarriages, THEY LOOSE THEIR UNBORN BABIES --- does this info get absorbed and... processed by the reader? All this is happening completely unnecessarily. If you think those shots are "safe" then how does the legal immunity make any sense? And where is the data that confirms their safety? Do you have it?
  8. In your last comment you implied that the spike protein is harmless, now you are calling it in irritant? I think you are just a troll. Or you are not one but cannot support your own claim so you are trying to deflect and twist words. Inflammation can of course be caused by pathogens. The literature I linked to in my comment literally called it a pathogen: The issue remains: the shots are making your own body produce a pathogen - an irritant in your language - how is this not a concern by itself? Plus neither the Pfizer nor the Moderna trial provided any data on in which parts of the body those spike proteins would be created and when their creation actually stops. So...how come you still haven't identified all the "so much misinformation" I allegedly posted?
  9. Can you share your source that confirms it is NOT a pathogen? I read several studies that show the opposite. Here are a couple: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7547916/ (--> BBB stand s for blood brain barrier) "SARS-CoV-2 spike protein triggers a pro-inflammatory response and upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases in human brain endothelial cells" "SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces loss of the BBB integrity" ".. in regard to the brain endothelium, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced destabilization of the BBB, promoted a pro-inflammatory status [...] the opening of the BBB, hints at the possible means in which the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen could also neuroinvade." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091897/#R2 "SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2" https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-N-1898-0246 This is one of the many warnings and concerns by the medical body about possible harm due to the risks of the damage that the spike protein causes: "As important as it is to quickly arrest the spread of the virus by immunizing the population, it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on these other organs." I don't think he was paid any attention to, and I am not aware of any effort by the manufacturers to rule out these known risks. Just like they have ignored many other risks that they were warned about. VAERS data shows an abnormal amount of myocarditis especially in male adolescents after receiving this injection with exactly what he warned about: permanent damage to their heart microvasculature since heart tissue does not regenerate. As I wrote in my comment which you quoted, I can only speak to Pfizer and Moderna since I have not researched the other candidates that much. Btw, you are using the terms "approved": none of these injections are approved. I have heard many sources claim that, even MSM and it is entirely false. No approval has been granted for any of them. What else to you believe to be an error in my claims and why?
  10. Exactly. My opinion is it should always be one's personal choice and not just for the time being. And by law, it is one's personal choice. Much more legally protected even when it comes to unapproved vaccines/treatments like these ones. Numbers are inaccurate, tests aren't even adequate, official opinions keep on flip-flopping and no scientific data is produced to back those up...I don't watch MSM as they are the uterus of misinformation. I am all for rational debates based on hard data and scientific evidence. How else would science work? You come up with a hypothesis and then you see if you can produce evidence to confirm whether its true or not. In contrast a ton of false claims have been made here and essentially rendered themselves to be misinformation since none of them were supported by conclusive scientific data.
  11. According to the latest CDC data your chances of survival are 99.95% = IFR of 500 in 1,000,000. -> https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html. Rendering it "gamble" of 0.05% lethal risk for people your age. That is if you avoid treating this disease early with approved, safe and effective drugs which would lower that 0.05% risk by another 85-90% resulting in a statistical risk for people your age of 0.005%-0.0075%. This will remain another unsupported claim unless you can share a credible source to back it up. And no, neither facebook fact checkers nor a news article is a credible source. You can review my provided sources in one my previous comments where I claimed that according to it's legal definition and description by the manufacturer plus by sec.gov it is not qualifying to be considered a "vaccine". Where is your proof that it is one? Are you saying that your reaction is not qualifying as harm? Or that 435,077 AE's and 4,605 deaths are not something that equals harm? -> https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8;jsessionid=2C21310CEFC5B9826FE407B07CE1 I find that your included accusation extremely dangerous and potentially very harmful. I don't know what your definition of "good faith" is but mine includes to be honest and prevent harm to others. Adverse events need to be reported and shared to avoid other people being injured. Was your injury even reported to VAERS? Did it register after it was reported, did anyone even check on this? There are so many people all over the US and globally that have not only suffered severe adverse reactions after being injected but thousands have lost their lives! And these are only the reported numbers of a system that is estimated to register less than 1% of the AE's. It could well be tens of not 100's of thousands of lives lost just in the US due to these untested injections. Not addressing this is absolutely horrifying. Children have lost their parents. Parents have lost their children. Couples have lost each other. So many have been left dealing with physical damages and following disabilities for the rest of their lives without someone actually wanting to hear this. Here is just one source out of many examples: https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/ Do you want to allege they are all lying? I don't think so. Do you want to allege that's all just a "coincidence"? I don't think so either. These are people just like you, but they weren't as lucky as you in their experience after injection. They were injured way more severe. They want to be heard but not many are listening. And some are literally turning a blind eye to this which is just atrocious. These people took this injection because they believed other's misinformation without actually researching. And because there are many like this, i.e. people who don't verify if something is factually accurate, many of those injuries will follow. Therefore it is irresponsible to say these injections are safe, especially when one cannot even produce any data to support this (false) claim. I do wonder if they have attempted early treatment with the safe and approved drugs that are available to treat this disease very effectively or were they told by their doctors to go home, and "isolate" and come back once they turned blue cannot breathe anymore.
  12. Why do you believe that to be true? Based on what? You actually suffered a severe adverse reaction and you still believe you are "safer". The manufacturers even admit there is no data on transmission of the "virus" and you still believe you are keeping someone else "safe". And you got no answer as to why you actually believe that. I cannot wrap my head around this cognitive dissonance.
  13. Ignored because you have no data to support your opinion? This is what happens every single time when someone is asked for their reasoning to get this injection. They have no answer and run away. They are not able to produce any rational argument. Why are scientific debates avoided? Based on which evidence and data do people choose to take it? No one can answer that question apparently.
  14. I honestly would love to be wrong. I am constantly searching for the truth. I don't just blindly believe. Which points do you consider "misinformation" in here and why? Throwing out a claim without supporting it holds zero weight.
  15. I am so sorry you had to go through this. I wonder, what scientific data or any information for that matter, did make you decide to get these injections? I sincerely would appreciate if you like to share your reasoning behind this.
×
×
  • Create New...