Jump to content

Protocol417

Members
  • Posts

    516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Protocol417

  1. IF SOMEONE DID GIVE ME LAWYERS NUMBER I EXPECT THE LAWYER TO BE ABLE TO HELP ME AND NOT SAY BCOS HE DIDNT START THE PROCESS WITH US SO HE WONT GET INVOLVED AS AT NOW I NEED ANY LAWYER WHO CAN HELP US. THE WAIT IS KILLING US AND IS SO BAD

    Without answers to the other questions, I don't know what else you've already tried, so I can't be of much help. The only advice I can give is to try the other routes available to you if you have not already done so. Others in your position have had attorneys and they weren't able to speed things up. The only option I can see that a lawyer could exercise is to sue the USCIS. If that is what you want, then call around until you find a lawyer willing to do this. Try more than one.

    Good luck.


  2. As a liberal, I just want to say:



    - I haven't watched a minute of MSNBC since what's-his-face went off the rails with his "special comments". I can't remember ever reading their website. I can't comment on Al-Jazeera, Salon, or CNN, as I've never watched/read them myself (except at airports in the case of CNN). I get my news from aggregates, BBC, and the Guardian (because I have a friend who works there and he posts articles on Facebook a lot). So far as Forbes is concerned, I've cited them myself a time or two.



    - It's kind of hypocritical to complain that liberals generalize, and then generalize about liberals.



    - It's REALLY hypocritical to complain that liberals have no rebuttal except insults (even when those insults are pointing out suspected political bias) when your rebuttal is that they are "libtards" who only watch MSNBC.



    - Seriously? Libtards? Really? You expect to be taken seriously when you say things like that?




    Most important, I do not have to justify anything just because I am a liberal. This isn't a football game where I need to "support my team" no matter what, and even if I do "support Obama" that doesn't mean I have to cheer everything he does. Not that anyone's going to listen... many major liberal commentators have been vocally unhappy about the drone strikes, for example, but conservatives have still been attacking liberals for being on board with it when few of us actually are. Some liberals, especially those of us who want universal healthcare, have begrudgingly accepted Obamacare because, even though some of us feel that it is only more give-give-give to insurance companies, we feel it a) is better to try something than do nothing at all, b) is all that can be accomplished in the current political climate, and/or c) may be a stepping stone to something else, such as universal healthcare or something more along the lines of what Germany has. And yet we are still accused of following Obama without question! Even when people like Rachel Maddow, Jon Stewart, and Bill Maher are questioning, making fun of, and speaking against the president's actions, we have this accusation lobbed at us. It's ridiculous.



    Am I happy that the employer mandate was pushed back to 2015 yet individuals are required to purchase still in 2014? No, and I have said as such. If it had to be pushed back, both should've been. Do I understand why Obama was able to line-item and push back just the employer mandate like that? No. But before I freak out, I admit that I don't actually know if that is something that is within the president's (ANY president's) power or not, and I certainly have no idea if that is considered an "abuse of power" or not. Before I start grabbing for my tinfoil I'm going to do more research on that matter. Given the lack of reaction amongst those who are in the position to know, I'm not overly worried.




    So, please stop the circle jerk.




    Now, regarding the article, it says that the "states will be able to 'accept the applicant's attestations'" and "providing Exchanges with the temporarily expanded discretion to accept an attestation" (emphasis mine, in both cases). I don't see where it says "MUST accept". This tells me it is up to the states to decide how they want to handle it, which puts it outside of Federal control, and makes the conclusion pretty shaky, or at least reasonably questionable.


  3. How do we know there isn't a bunch of gnomes in an underground office somewhere printing all of these forms, manually creating punch cards, then feeding the cards into a reader? Can we at least say it's possible?

    smile.png

    Maybe THAT'S Step 2! They're taking our underwear and burning 'em to run their printers and card readers!

    (South Park reference, for those confused right now.)

  4. Hmmmm. Okay, this is what I have access to:

    - The tax transcripts mentioned above, showing both my income and my ex-husbands lumped into a single number

    - Printouts of paystubs (my company does not issue physical paystubs)

    - The tax return (sans W-2) for 2012 (basically the 1040A form) - unsigned (the tax accountant sent the signed copy to the IRS)

    - I think I can get the letter from my employer

    Do you think this will work?

    Do I need to provide bank statements if I make well over 125% of the poverty level? I'm more of a "cash under the mattress" kinda gal...

  5. Just take a minute... breath, relax. This is just a delay and you will find a way through it. Calm down, and think.

    What else besides talking to the Congressman have you tried? And what did your Congressman tell you?

    Have you checked to see when your file was last touched? Does the website show that you have an RFE?

    Did you call into USCIS, and if so, what did they tell you?

    Have you tried contacting your local office?

    If someone did give you a number, what would you ask or expect the lawyer to do? What do you believe is within their power?

    I understand completely where you're coming from. I had a lot of legal stuff I had to take care of before my fiance and I could even apply, and I had no idea how long it would take to get through that. It is hard, it's scary, but it's worth it. You won't be left in limbo forever, and you're closer to the end than a lot of people. Just keep in mind that the end is near, you just need to find that way that helps you get there. We are here to help you with that!

  6. Hello everyone, I'm hoping you can help me with something.

    We're getting ready for our NOA2 and I'm gathering documentation for evidence of support.

    I got divorced in January 2013 after a long separation. My ex-husband and I filed our 2012 taxes jointly to save each other money. Unfortunately, he took all of the documents with him home to scan before giving them back to me and somehow managed to lose my W-2 in the process.

    I read in another thread that you could simply apply to the IRS for tax transcripts and this would work, so that's what I did. I received my tax transcripts today, however, and realized that they reflect wages for both myself and my ex-husband, all lumped into one number, so it doesn't show just my wages broken out.

    Is this going to be okay? If not, any tips for what document I should replace it with?

    Also, is it going to be a problem that my most recent tax documents say "married filing jointly"?

  7. I don't see why a same-sex applicant would need an attorney UNLESS they are wrongfully denied. I would say go for it by yourself (because there are so many horror stories on here of people who used attorneys) and if you get denied and feel it was because you are a same-sex couple, THEN hire an attorney. There is nothing different about the application process for same-sex couple as there is for opposite-sex couples; USCIS is already approving their applications.

    (Please be warned, there are people on here who are morally opposed to same-sex marriage and may give you biased advice for that reason.)

  8. I don't understand what you mean by two years worth of documents. I just got married and will be adding her to these benefits, but by the time she gets her interview it will probably be only 9 or 10 months since we've been married smile.png

    Oh, my mistake!!! I came here from the front page, not the forums, and I saw "K-1 visa" in the tags and thought this was what we were talking about. Sorry! (EDIT: Odd thing is, the second I posted this comment, three of the tags disappeared, and now it only says "Spouse visa" huh.png ).

  9. You are right there. I never thought of it in that way. And it happens quite a bit. For example, I find my taste for beer has increased cuz my husband drinks it and also his taste for a fantastic bone-dry crisp glass of white wine!

    And its ma'am! smile.png

    While I have, by sheer coincidence I assure you wink.png, taken more of a liking to good white wine, I will never pick up his like of beer or the brand of white wine he drinks *lol* It's more the food (pasties, pies, gammon, Yorkshire pudding, etc.) of his that's rubbed off on me, aside from the aforementioned sport (no Formula 1, though! Or tennis! I refuse! tongue.png ). Oh, and his love of British comedy panel shows.

    A friend of mine, in a USC/USC relationship, did recently take up a sudden obsession with craft beers and bicycling due to her boyfriend, though. So it's not just us weird bi-national couples ;)

  10. I've mentioned this in other threads, but... this is my second marriage. In my first, we had a traditional ceremony and reception, nothing huge, maybe 75 people. Despite the small size and relatively low expense, it was still a major pain. People seem to have certain expectations of what a wedding MUST be, and after dealing with the people involved with wedding planning, I have somewhat more sympathy for bridezillas. The coordinator coped an attitude just because I said it was the bridesmaids' choice over who walked down the aisle first. My then-future in-laws fought to have an open bar, even though we couldn't afford it. The groom's sister nearly went into shock because I let the flower girl pick out which dress she wanted to wear. Definitely one of the strangest experiences of my life.

    The uncertainty over when we'll actually have the visa almost is like a blessing in this case. I can't imagine putting up with all the stresses (EDIT: and expenses!) of normal wedding planning and dealing with the visa process at the same time! We have a friend who is an officiant, I have a beautiful peach vintage dress, he has his grandfather's handsome tailored suit. When the time comes, no matter where we end up having the wedding, when it ends up being, or how many people are there, we will have each other and we will be surrounded by friends, and that's all that matters smile.png

  11. I'm not surprised that you did! Watching a soccer game in any European country is an experience on to itself!

    Good thing is about our respective divorce situations is that they are over!!!! biggrin.png

    Yes, ma'am/sir! Very happy for all that to be over!

    Isn't it interesting how we seem to pick up our SO's habits, likes, and dislikes, no matter if you're in a "normal" relationship or a LDR? :)

  12. You would have to go ruin what could possibly be an awesome thread about guns and war, by bringing the gheys into it.

    Never fear! Gay people shoot guns and fight wars, too! Awesome thread saved!

    Wish I could say the same thing about some peoples' senses of humor (not you) but we can't all get what we want...

  13. I added my fiance as a beneficiary for my life insurance and my bank account before we were even officially engaged, but to answer your question: YES. Add your fiance/e to as much as you can as soon as possible and then save every single statement or bill you get with both of your names on it. You will eventually have to show two years' worth of cohabitation; I've read threads from people who showed less than this and got an RFE when trying to remove conditions.

×
×
  • Create New...