Beltway sniper to be executed at 9pm

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You have to hand it to Joe, once he is set on a course, there is no deflecting him off it, no matter what dodgy path it leads him down. It's like watching one of those clockwork toys

It doesn't take much to wind him up either, really very environmentally friendly.

You never refute what I say. Only when I make obvious mistakes such as missing something in a post, or etc... Do you pounce on me. Never the substance. "but there is no substance in your posts *whine*"

Bingo!

It's is similar to the straw-man argument of 'my interpretation of stats' apparently being wrong. Why? In reality, simply because they disagree with them. That is, refuse to accept them.

No Boo. In reality its because you don't develop your opinion from the statistics, rather you cherry pick things to fit your preconceived ideas.

Then clearly there is no practical difference between Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, Major Hassan and Osama Bin Laden. RIGHT

There isn't any substance Joe - you either resort to cookie cutter preconceptions that badly misrepresent people's opinions, or you act like one of those pull string toys, parroting the half a dozen stock phrases that have been programmed into you. WRONG (and another copout i might add)

Now you're just lying.

How am I lying?

Now you're being deliberately stupid.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

You have to hand it to Joe, once he is set on a course, there is no deflecting him off it, no matter what dodgy path it leads him down. It's like watching one of those clockwork toys

It doesn't take much to wind him up either, really very environmentally friendly.

You never refute what I say. Only when I make obvious mistakes such as missing something in a post, or etc... Do you pounce on me. Never the substance. "but there is no substance in your posts *whine*"

Bingo!

It's is similar to the straw-man argument of 'my interpretation of stats' apparently being wrong. Why? In reality, simply because they disagree with them. That is, refuse to accept them.

No Boo. In reality its because you don't develop your opinion from the statistics, rather you cherry pick things to fit your preconceived ideas.

Then clearly there is no practical difference between Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, Major Hassan and Osama Bin Laden. RIGHT

There isn't any substance Joe - you either resort to cookie cutter preconceptions that badly misrepresent people's opinions, or you act like one of those pull string toys, parroting the half a dozen stock phrases that have been programmed into you. WRONG (and another copout i might add)

Now you're just lying.

How am I lying?

Now you're being deliberately stupid.

No seriously, how was saying "right" and "wrong" a lie?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Now you're seriously being stupid.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Now you're seriously being stupid.

I guess we're done here.

[Heracles 417]

You have to hand it to Joe, once he is set on a course, there is no deflecting him off it, no matter what dodgy path it leads him down. It's like watching one of those clockwork toys

It doesn't take much to wind him up either, really very environmentally friendly.

You never refute what I say. Only when I make obvious mistakes such as missing something in a post, or etc... Do you pounce on me. Never the substance. "but there is no substance in your posts *whine*"

Bingo!

It's is similar to the straw-man argument of 'my interpretation of stats' apparently being wrong. Why? In reality, simply because they disagree with them. That is, refuse to accept them.

No Boo. In reality its because you don't develop your opinion from the statistics, rather you cherry pick things to fit your preconceived ideas.

I let the facts and reality guide my opinion. I don't just look for stats that support by beliefs. You guys on the other hand absolutely refuse to accept anything and everything that goes against your own opinions and ideological stance. Without a doubt, you will have an excuse for everything presented that goes against your views. To the contrary, even hearsay is good enough when something supports your opinion.

Once Joe understand this, if he already has not, he'll understand who he is chatting with. The fact is no matter what Joe posts, you will never agree with it. Joe also needs to realize that you guys are in lockstep on every single issue and have been so for a good four years now. Whereas, I will agree with Joe on some issues and disagree on others. I will agree with Charles on some and disagree with others. I will agree with Kaydee on some and disagree on others. Never ever seen you guys disagree.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

*yawn*

Stop whining will you. You sound like a bloody baby.

[Heracles 417]

Now you're seriously being stupid.

I guess we're done here.

Almost every discussion with six eventually ends up a that point.

*yawn*

Stop whining will you. You sound like a bloody baby.

I was just about to edit and add that the second some points out your bullcrap, you will come out with a 'you're whining' rhetoric.

Edited November 10, 2009 by Booyah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Now you're seriously being stupid.

I guess we're done here.

Almost every discussion with six eventually ends up a that point.

*yawn*

Stop whining will you. You sound like a bloody baby.

I was just about to edit and add you will come out with a 'you're whining' comment the second some catches you bullcrap out.

Good for you. Now will you stop?

[Peikko 1,575]

You have to hand it to Joe, once he is set on a course, there is no deflecting him off it, no matter what dodgy path it leads him down. It's like watching one of those clockwork toys

It doesn't take much to wind him up either, really very environmentally friendly.

You never refute what I say. Only when I make obvious mistakes such as missing something in a post, or etc... Do you pounce on me. Never the substance. "but there is no substance in your posts *whine*"

Bingo!

It's is similar to the straw-man argument of 'my interpretation of stats' apparently being wrong. Why? In reality, simply because they disagree with them. That is, refuse to accept them.

No Boo. In reality its because you don't develop your opinion from the statistics, rather you cherry pick things to fit your preconceived ideas.

I let the facts and reality guide my opinion. I don't just look for stats that support by beliefs. You guys on the other hand absolutely refuse to accept anything and everything that goes against your own opinions and ideological stance. Without a doubt, you will have an excuse for everything presented that goes against your views. To the contrary, even hearsay is good enough when something supports your opinion.

Once Joe understand this, if he already has not, he'll understand who he is chatting with. The fact is no matter what Joe posts, you will never agree with it. Joe also needs to realize that you guys are in lockstep on every single issue and have been so for a good four years now. Whereas, I will agree with Joe on some issues and disagree on others. I will agree with Charles on some and disagree with others. I will agree with Kaydee on some and disagree on others. Never ever seen you guys disagree.

This post is exactly like your presentation of statistics. You have a theory and you fit reality to that theory. I do not have a 'clique' of people I mindlessly agree with but I understand you think that I do.

[Heracles 417]

Good for you. Now will you stop?

Stop? Mate, it will only stop the second you actually get a life and stop hanging out here looking for people you dislike to antagonize or ridicule. It's why you were stuck on the Orielly 'f-ck it' for so long. You seem to have a real complex issue with those who don't share your um 'unique' views.

The second you start to dislike someone, it's all over. They need to get ready for you to follow them around and eventually insult their intelligence. After all, you are the only person here on my ignore list. Who has time for your utter rubbish? Trying to discuss anything with is a big waste of time and always leads nowhere.

Edited November 10, 2009 by Booyah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Good for you. Now will you stop?

Stop? Mate, it will only stop the second you actually get a life and stop hanging out here looking for people you dislike to antagonize or ridicule. It's why you were stuck on the Orielly 'f-ck it' for so long. You seem to have a real complex issue with those who don't share your um 'unique' views. The second you start to dislike someone, they need to get ready for you to follow them around and eventually insult their intelligence.

After all, you are the only person here on my ignore list. Who has time for your utter rubbish?

It doesn't seem to be working real well, does it.

So let me get this straight - because I posted an edited video of O'Reilly swearing his head off in my signature it proves that I hang out here to antagonise or ridicule people?

[Heracles 417]

So let me get this straight - because I posted an edited video of O'Reilly swearing his head off in my signature it proves that I hang out here to antagonise or ridicule people?

No one else here seems to be fixated on what others have said, only you.

I may not like a handful of posters that are all coincidentally your buddies, however, I have better things to follow them around.

Edited November 10, 2009 by Booyah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

So let me get this straight - because I posted an edited video of O'Reilly swearing his head off in my signature it proves that I hang out here to antagonise or ridicule people?

No one else here seems to be fixated on what others have said, only you.

I may not like a handful of posters that are all coincidentally your buddies, however, I have better things to follow them around.

What does this have to do with a comedy video of Bill O'Reilly?

[Joseph & Ana 0]

So let me get this straight - because I posted an edited video of O'Reilly swearing his head off in my signature it proves that I hang out here to antagonise or ridicule people?

No one else here seems to be fixated on what others have said, only you.

I may not like a handful of posters that are all coincidentally your buddies, however, I have better things to follow them around.

What does this have to do with a comedy video of Bill O'Reilly?

You should like Oreilly he's a lib just like you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

So let me get this straight - because I posted an edited video of O'Reilly swearing his head off in my signature it proves that I hang out here to antagonise or ridicule people?

No one else here seems to be fixated on what others have said, only you.

I may not like a handful of posters that are all coincidentally your buddies, however, I have better things to follow them around.

What does this have to do with a comedy video of Bill O'Reilly?

You should like Oreilly he's a lib just like you.

Then surely you should like Major Hassan or any of those fine figures mentioned earlier. They're nutters. Just like you.