US rejects Nejad's victory claim

[Saddle Bronc 124]

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/us_us_ira.../13/224890.html

U.S. Rejects Victory Claim by Ahmadinejad

2009/06/13

NIAGARA FALLS, Ontario -- The U.S. on Saturday refused to accept hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claim of a landslide re-election victory in Iran and said it was looking into allegations of election fraud.

"We are monitoring the situation as it unfolds in Iran, but we, like the rest of the world, are waiting and watching to see what the Iranian people decide," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said at a news conference with Canada's foreign affairs minister, Lawrence Cannon.

Minutes after Clinton spoke, the White House released a two-sentence statement praising "the vigorous debate and enthusiasm that this election generated, particularly among young Iranians," but expressing concern about "reports of irregularities."

Neither Clinton nor the White House mentioned Ahmadinejad or his chief rival, Mir Hossein Mousavi, by name, or acknowledged the incumbent's victory declaration.

Iranian authorities reported that Ahmadinejad was re-elected with 62.6 percent of the vote. He called on the public to respect the vote. But Mousavi, a former prime minister who has become the hero of a youth-driven movement seeking greater liberties and a gentler face for Iran abroad, rejected the results and accused authorities of rigging Friday's vote.

In brief remarks in Canada, Clinton cited "the enthusiasm and the very vigorous debate and dialogue" in the run-up to the vote. "We obviously hope that the outcome reflects the genuine will and desire of the Iranian people," she said.

Cannon said his country was "deeply concerned" by reports of irregularities in the election. "We're troubled by reports of intimidation of opposition candidates' offices by security forces," he said. "Canada is calling on Iranian authorities to conduct fair and transparent counting of all ballots."

The election outcome will not sharply alter Iran's main policies or sway major decisions, such as possible talks with Washington or nuclear policies. Those crucial issues rest with the ruling clerics headed by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

But the election focused on what the office of the Iranian president can influence: boosting Iran's sinking economy, pressing for greater media and political freedoms, and being Iran's main envoy to the world.

Iran does not allow international election monitors. During the 2005 election, when Ahmadinejad won the presidency, there were some allegations of vote rigging from losers, but the claims were never investigated.

© 2009 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Clinton's rejection is meaningless due to US not currently having diplomatic relations with Iran--although (as Steve/Jinky aka Bat Guano posted), it is not unlikely that the election (which is more akin to an Indian presidential election--where ruling-party's candidate almost invariably wins--than US version, though admittedly Iranian president is somewhat more than just rubber-stamp for country's real rulers) was rigged (by Khamenei & co). Edited June 15, 2009 by CherryXS

[My Name Is Nobody 3]

Yes, it is meaniless.

Also, all I heard the last 8 years is how we should stay out of other countries business??

[pedroh 21]

iran comission also declared invalid elections

[My Name Is Nobody 3]

iran comission also declared invalid elections

Sounds like Iran might self destruct from the inside out.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

iran comission also declared invalid elections

sounds like Iran might self destruct from the inside out.

I'm going to say "not necessarily" here.

Iran is an ancient nation/culture which (maybe due to proximity and some kinship) with cultures of Sub-continent, achieved a "stable level of chaos" long ago; this is more like a blip in that.

(fyi, many made such predictions about India at Partition and afterwards--and India has not split up in the 62 years since)