Jump to content

17 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted
maybe the guy got the wrong idea behind going green.

:lol: ha. I hope this arsonist isn't some Greenpeace wacko. Not that Greenpeace doesn't do good work most of the time, but some people can be too extreme.

drinkblink14.gif
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

Actually for that era, the Escort was Ford's most reliable vehicle with the least amount of problems. My daughter-in-law's 95 Excort did get her through pharmacy school, was parked on overly salted streets in Madison, poorly maintained, but did have 160K miles on the clock. She was attached to it after she married my son. A PFE EGR sensor was defective, so when her EGR valve wouldn't open, never gave her a HAL, that is what I call that heart attack lamp that lights up on the dash if there are any engine problems requiring attention. Correct term is CEL for check engine lamp, but if you are driving in subzero weather out in the boon docks like most of Wisconsin is like, could easily get a heart attack if that lamp comes on. That EGR caused the exhaust valves to burn, engine still ran, but had very low compression, so didn't run very well.

She got her use out of it and the AC was still working as well as the radio.

Ford's counter to Honda in the late 80's was to come out with a 3.8L V-6 and got very high reviews from Consumers Report, CT produces chit in my opinion, we still have an energy crisis, and the dumb bastards started anothe HP race. I had an 88 Accord with a five speed, and a 1.7 L engine that still would give 0-60 mph times of under ten seconds, with a top speed of 110 mph, plenty good enough, but the best part, would get 46 mpg on the interstate, at least 34 mpg around town. But CR downgraded this because the Taurus was a tad faster. But never said anything about the poorer fuel economy. If I had any faith in CR, these guys are loaded with BS.

The 3.8 was loaded with problems, Ford never learned how to attach an aluminum head to a cast iron block with constant head gasket problems, and their AXOD automatic transmission was more suited for a moped that a compact sized car. Ironically, they used this same piece of ####### in their flagship vehicle, the Continental. They also used Teflon in their AC compressors that caused black death requiring the entire AC system to be replaced including that dreaded evaporator that required removing the entire dash to change it. Plus their infamous sub-frame design, sure could for production, but extremely expensive for maintenance. The Escort did not share these problems. You can also add the Sable to the Ford lists of passenger vehicles, this line of ####### started in 1988 and was not corrected until 2000, twelve years of #######. AXOD, AC, and engine would go out shortely after warranty with a price tag of around $6,500 for repairs. And that was on a vehicle no Ford dealer in his right mind would offer a hundred bucks for a trade-in. Surprised Ford didn't go bankrupt. Also avoided lawsuits with their very poor alternator connector that was causing engine fires.

The bodies were good though and the Taurus with the 3.0L engine imported from Japan had a good history. Ford trucks and SUV's didn't share the mechanical problems, but their bodies were ####### and would rust out in the road salt areas, like here.

I gave my 88 Honda to my daughter, it had close to 250K on it, still ran like a clock, but it couldn't withstand all that road salt in Madison when she was going through college, so got rid of it. Honda's were very good back then, but like anybody else, the latter models are #######, but not as poor as the Ford's were. And for some strange reason, those Honda's held their resale value that I could never explain.

It was strange for me working in a field where the public was first accepting 100K miles of useful life then 200K, when also working in the semi truck field where not even an overhaul was required until you hit 4 million miles with a useful life of 8 million miles. All the automotive manufacturers are producing ####### in terms of what could be done. But don't blame the engineers, blame marketing.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...