Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Saddle Bronc

Indian Communists block US-India nuclear deal

1 post in this topic

Recommended Posts


India's nuclear bargain blocked

December 21, 2007

By Jason Motlagh

NEW DELHI — Communist Party leaders say they are trying to keep U.S. influence at bay and protect India's poor from ruthless foreign enterprises by blocking a deal on nuclear energy with the United States.

Critics of the Communists put it a little differently, arguing that they are engaging in political obstructionism in hopes of developing closer ties with China — at the expense of the same rural underclass they claim to represent.

Partly correct. CPI/CPI-M never did care about the underclass (as shown in Nandigram-see below. But it is not about closer ties to China in this case, but simply a chopfrack move to "show Mr. Singh he needs to obey us", à la Jayalalitha of 1998--forgetting that she fell resoundingly in 1999 (though able to stage a "comeback" in the state of Tamil Nadu in 2001, followed by defeat in 2006.

The Communists, with enough seats in Parliament to force an election at any time, have staunchly rejected the deal — which would allow India to buy U.S. nuclear energy technology without giving up its weapons program — ever since it was signed in July 2005 by President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

They describe it as an affront to Indian sovereignty that gives the United States too much power over foreign-policy matters.

"To make India's foreign policy and strategic autonomy hostage to the potential of nuclear energy does not make sense," Communist Party of India (Marxist) General Secretary Prakash Karat has written, "except for the American imperative to bind India to its strategic designs in Asia."

So why should it be bound to China, which has proven itself an enemy--in 1962?

Aside from a heavy-handed grip on power for the past 30 years in West Bengal state, the four Communist parties making up the left wing of Indian politics have remained at the fringe of national politics — until recently.

The landscape changed in 2004, when Mr. Singh's Congress Party defeated the incumbent Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party but failed to win enough seats to rule on their own.

The Communists agreed to join a 16-party coalition formed by Congress but refused to accept a Cabinet seat — a tactical decision that has given them the leverage to fold the government at any time.

The nuclear pact, viewed in Washington as the cornerstone of a new strategic relationship with India to counter China's global ascent, would provide India with "full civil nuclear cooperation."

This includes the assurance of nuclear technologies and reactor fuel for the energy-starved country in exchange for New Delhi's pledge to separate civilian and nuclear facilities and call a moratorium on nuclear testing.

Proponents in the ruling Congress Party and scientific community say it is a vital step away from decades of nonaligned politics, during which India was a byword for poverty and state inertia.

More important, the deal would help India to boost its output of electricity in order to sustain its breakneck economic growth — second only to China's over the past 15 years. Mr. Singh thinks the nuclear deal would boost India's nuclear power production from 3 percent to 10 percent of total energy production by 2020.

The Communists have offered no alternative plan to meet energy requirements, instead making known their plans to scale back commercial activity and undo reforms that have gradually integrated India into the global economy.

Some analysts think the Communists' real agenda is to move India away from the United States and closer to China, a theory that Mr. Karat has reinforced with recent remarks.

In October, he said the main problem with the nuclear deal is that it is part of a U.S. plan to "encircle" China. Last month, he praised China as "the most powerful socialist country capable of challenging the might of the United States."

Initially, I had thought Karat may be pragmatic (as the possibility of elections--and his party's losing in subsequent horsetrading--seemed to mellow him), but he has proven himself a senile chopfrack as most CPI/CPI-M.

Leftist obstructionism of the nuclear deal was recently undercut by a series of ugly events in West Bengal state, a longtime Communist Party stronghold, in which members of the rural underclass were victimized.

Communist leaders in the state had set up Special Economic Zones, inspired by the Chinese model, to attract business interests after heavily pro-labor policies stalled the economy, but farmers refused to vacate lands designated for the project.

In March, the state government sent armed thugs and police to attack protesters in the village of Nandigram, where a chemical complex was to be built, leaving 14 persons dead.

When protests resumed last month, a second wave of attacks was ordered in which six persons were killed and almost 5,000 were displaced. A wave of anger swept across the country when party leaders declared the violence was "morally and legally" justified.

IMO, the farmers were targetted because they had realised the CPI to be chopfracks, and this knowledge could spread to other districts

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in


As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
  • Create New...