Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7145629.stm,

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7146188.stm

(but article from WashTimes)

Musharraf lifts state of emergency

Paul Alexander

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) – President Pervez Musharraf lifted a six-week-old state of emergency today and said in a nationally televised address that he imposed it as a last resort to save Pakistan from destruction from an unspecified conspiracy.

Musharraf said unnamed conspirators had hatched a plot with members of the judiciary to derail the country's transition to democracy. Parliamentary elections, scheduled for Jan. 8, will determine who will form the next government.

"Against my will, as a last resort, I had to impose the emergency in order to save Pakistan," Musharraf said. "The conspiracy was hatched to destabilize the country. I cannot tell how much pain the nation and I suffered due to this conspiracy."

(Reality: he was afraid the Supreme Court would figure out, and rule, that his "election" as president was rigged. He "suffered" about as much as war-criminal Zia did in imposing martial-law. Also of note that the last provably-fair election in Pakistan occured in 1970)

Musharraf has previously said he imposed the state of emergency to halt a "conspiracy" by top judges to end his eight-year rule and ward off political chaos that would hobble Pakistan's efforts against Islamic extremism. He has also insisted that the Supreme Court, which had been poised to rule on the legality of his October re-election, was acting beyond the constitution.

"Now the conspiracy has been foiled, and the election will be held on Jan. 8 ... in a free and fair manner," he said in the 20-minute address.

Musharraf's order to lift Pakistan's six-week-old state of emergency and restore the constitution eased a crackdown that has enraged opponents and worried Western supporters. But the order contained a controversial clause that entrenched decisions Musharraf made under the emergency, including the strict curbs on press freedom and the replacement of independent-minded judges with jurists friendlier to Musharraf. Such decisions "shall not be called into question by or before any court," the clause said.

Both Musharraf and his Western backers say they want the election to produce a stable, moderate government strong enough to stand up to a wave of Islamic militancy.

However, the clampdown on independent media and purge of the judiciary has prompted his leading opponents, former prime ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, to warn of mass demonstrations if they think the vote has been rigged in favor of pro-Musharraf rivals.

Musharraf warned political parties not to stir up trouble as the country faces what he called another grave period.

"I regret some parties are boycotting the election while there is no justification," Musharraf said. "The electioneering has not started yet, but some parties are talking of rigging. They should refrain from such accusations. People should take part in the electioneering, cast their vote but should not indulge in any negative activity. The country should not be put into any trouble."

Saturday's order required judges, including those appointed by Musharraf during the emergency, to take the oath of office again. He swore in the Supreme Court's chief justice, then sat solemnly as the justice administered the oath to the rest of the court.

"Musharraf's so-called return to constitutional rule provides legal cover to laws that muzzle the media and lawyers and gives the army a license to abuse," said Ali Dayan Hasan, South Asia researcher at New York-based Human Rights Watch.

The group urged the U.S. and Britain to pressure Musharraf "to insist on a genuine return to constitutional rule and the restoration of the judiciary."

A leader of Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party praised the end of the emergency but said it did not completely dispel concerns about the fairness of the elections.

"It is a good step, but let's see whether the elections are free, fair and transparent," Makhdoom Amin Fahim said.

He did not rule out cooperation with Musharraf if widespread cheating is avoided.

"But so far, it does not appear that the elections would be held in a fair manner," Fahim said. "All the government machinery is being exploited for foul play."

Liaquat Baloch, a senior leader of the opposition coalition Muttaheda Majlis-e-Amal, or United Action Forum, called Musharraf's move a "fraud," saying judges dismissed by the president have not been restored and the constitution was altered under the emergency.

"Musharraf had two targets – getting through the illegal process of his elections and purging the judiciary of independent-minded judges – and he achieved both targets," Baloch said.

The president on Friday removed a condition from the constitution stating that civil servants – including army officers – had to wait two years after their retirement before running for elected office, Attorney General Malik Mohammed Qayyum told The Associated Press.

Musharraf stepped down as army chief only last month.

Qayyum said other changes sealed the retirement of purged Supreme Court judges, including former Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, who either refused or were not invited to sign a fresh oath after the emergency. Their replacements swiftly approved Musharraf's re-election in October by a Parliament stacked with his supporters.

Jamaat-e-Islami – Pakistan's largest Islamic party – withdrew its 130 candidates for Parliament and 450 nominations for provincial assemblies in protest against Musharraf's dismissal of judges, spokesman Ameerul Azim said.

"This is a fraud election. We are boycotting unless the judges are restored," he said.

(Although true, this comes from a party which never has, and never will believe-in or practice free/fair elections)

Qayyum said Musharraf was considering whether to grant an opposition demand for the suspension of mayors to prevent them from influencing the elections, and whether to lift a ban on anyone serving more than twice as prime minister. That could ease his fraught relations with opposition leaders and archrivals Bhutto and Sharif.

However, Sen. Raza Rabbani of Bhutto's party said removing the mayors less than four weeks before the elections was a gesture to appease the international community.

Basically, the only ones who ever could trust chopfrack Musharraf were/are always the Indians (due to his ethnic group of mohajir--eh, this group CHOSE Pakistan at Partition, we can safely assume that none of them have ever mellowed in their hatred against India)

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Posted
:dance::thumbs::D

Citizenship

Event Date

Service Center : California Service Center

CIS Office : San Francisco CA

Date Filed : 2008-06-11

NOA Date : 2008-06-18

Bio. Appt. : 2008-07-08

Citizenship Interview

USCIS San Francisco Field Office

Wednesday, September 10,2008

Time 2:35PM

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...