Jump to content

colin2496

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by colin2496

  1. After speaking to my wife Looks like she was turned away on 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I)

    Which basically means

    Section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) basically means, "Immigrant without an immigrant visa." Apparently, whoever you're talking about was found ineligible for the TN classification and was properly found to be inadmissible under 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I). The purpose of her trip was to work in the U.S. She was not qualified for any visa classification that would allow her to work in the U.S. Therefore, she's a 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) case.

    So it seems its a little different. I do not believe she needs a waiver for this.

    I'm fairly sure that is quite serious as well but post on here and see what other people say.

  2. I guess I'm having trouble finding the 'severity' of a denial of entry due to presumed immigrant intent because I was denied entry twice for the same reason and it wasn't an issue

    What happened that was so severe?

    Ok i can't give you anymore info on the severity of the incident it is what i've said and nothing more. It all seemed very low key at the boarder and now I can't get my IR-1! Should I now just get A solicitor on the case?

  3. SO again, my question is...what did the denial say? What documentation did you get of the denial? If you didn't get any, get on the phone with the consulate and find out

    GOod luck

    Denial from London was that due to the serverity of the incident at the border I would need a wavier, they gave me the 601 papers and said I would now have to leave the Embassy, no further action would be taken on my case until the 601 and hardship form were recieved. I received no official refusal from the embassy.

  4. (a) Determinations of inadmissibility. (1) An alien who applies for admission under the provisions of section 217 of the Act, who is determined by an immigration officer not to be eligible for admission under that section or to be inadmissible to the United States under one or more of the grounds of inadmissibility listed in section 212 of the Act (other than for lack of a visa), or who is in possession of and presents fraudulent or counterfeit travel documents, will be refused admission into the United States and removed. Such refusal and removal shall be made at the level of the port director or officer-in-charge, or an officer acting in that capacity, and shall be effected without referral of the alien to an immigration judge for further inquiry, examination, or hearing, except that an alien who presents himself or herself as an applicant for admission under section 217 of the Act, who applies for asylum in the United States must be issued a Form I–863, Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge, for a proceeding in accordance with §208.2(b)(1) and (2) of this chapter.

    Which one of the listed items applied to you when you entered from Canada? Were you in possession of fraudulant documents?

    What was the grounds for denial? You must have received some documentation

    Good luck

    I entered with a valid UK passport, the grounds for denial were as I stated in the post (although I failed to make it clear that I am married to A USC) because we came in via land I had no return ticket and they ASSUMED I would stay illegally. They took a statement and finger prints from me, and told me I could not have a copy of the statement which I asked for, then told me to return to Canada. I still had a valid work permit for Canada so off we went. The only proof I have of the incident is the notation in my passport.

  5. I have recently had an IR-1 turned down because the notation that I had put in my passport in Feb this year 8 CFR 217.4(a)(1)even though when I was refused entry to the USA the POE Officer said there would be no problem when I made the application to London later in the year.

    This situation occured on a visit to the USA via land entry from Canada without proof of return ticket the Officier simply assumed I would stay in the USA.

    Any thoughts please?

×
×
  • Create New...