Jump to content

Michele R

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michele R

  1. Hey guys!! I just got the e-mail from CRIS!!! I can't believe it !!! The wait if finally over!!! We got the approval no RFE! Thank God!!!! I am going out of my mind right now!!!! :dance::dance::dance:

    Hi Ovi - We are so happy for you. I am sitting here with Kirill reading your message and we both congratulate you. Last night I told him about the whole letter writing campaign stuff that we were trying to organize and he said that he hoped your approval came through as well - and the next morning, what do I find, your approval!! Great news. Michele and Kirill

  2. Wow it's quiet here tonight...I wonder if anything happened today! Yesterday there were approvals popping up everywhere!

    With just 2 approvals today, looks like a really quiet place today! Hope for a better tomorrow.

    Hopefully people just haven't updated yet...fingers crossed!

    I was reading the March filers and there were some folks on 3/27 still waiting...but I look at April and there are approvals. So I guess it's a hit and miss :)

    So I arrived in Moscow to see Kirill yesterday I woke of this morning to check my e-mail and to my surprise I see the approval notice in the inbox. I could not believe it! Just last Friday I called all of my wedding vendors to cancel the wedding - now I may be able to put things back on track. Thank you God, everyone here for their support (especially when I was going crazy trying to organize a letter campaign), and the VSC!

  3. Question - If there are newbies that want to try and take action what difference is it to you - why continue to comment without actually saying anything pertinent to this topic? BTW - the topic is the current inequity between the CSC and the VSC. I have seen nonething constructive in what you are postiing and am not quite sure what the point of your involvement in this thread is, other than to get attention.

    Right now, what would be helpful is facts (not opinions) as to why these inequitieis develop from time to time and what may be done to improve the service. Do you have any facts? Do you know of other people that have tried to deal with this particular issue in the past? If so, what happened or didn't happen? Did anyone in your support group submit a FOIA to get information about this issue - did it actually result in any information pertinent to this topic? Do you know of ways to approcah our Senators that are particulalry effective regarding this inequity?

    If you don't have any real input, however, please continue to air your grievences and hostilities towards us or the system, we are certainly a captive audience and I find all of your responses childishly amusing in a "nana nana boo boo" sort of way.

    Michele, part of the answer you are looking for can be found on the nature of the work that service centers do. They do not process only fiance(e) visas. They process multiple kinds of petitions, and their priorities seem to change as time rolls.

    Before May my I-129F was on pace to be approved in just three months at VSC, but then came the work visa petition process (I believe H-1 visa process) and VSC slowed to a crawl. Prior to May VSC rolled through I-129F petitions very quickly, to the point that I was one week away (based on Igor's list) to be approved based on the time of NOA1 (meaning that at the end of April they were already approving petitions with NOA1 date just one week ahead of mine). Well, that one week turned into two months and my I-129F was only approved at the end of June.

    So, when we ask for changes, we need to keep in mind that the whole immigration process has to be streamlined for more predictability for every type of case being processed in these centers.

    thank you - that is an excellent point

  4. Michele, what you view as hostility is nothing of the sort. I pretty much told everyone how my battle with Immigration turned out and I was basically told to screw off. I could actually give you some avenues to go down to assist you, but I have seen that it will not help. So now I am merely amusing myself by the way some people on this thread have chosen to ignore those with experience rather than question them on why they feel it is a waste of time. If you don't like it I honestly don't care, but I am still waiting to see if someone has something to say that will actually work. So far nothing. But I will stay as long as I desire, so you will have to deal with it.

    Now rather than waste your time worrying about me why don't you write some letters and get the government fixed?

    come and put your stinky little turds and wet blankets on the table and then circle the table on your moral high horse, snorting and whining in a "nana nana boo boo" sort of way.

    Okay but do the stinky little turds go on top of, underneath, or in between the wet blankets? :rofl:

    Can't they be all of the above? :innocent:

    Gotta love the visuals - we've got the stinky little turds everywhere :-), everytime the table is cleared we get a fresh new pile.

    Back to morocco forever - I will repeat the questions I put on the table:

    Do you have any facts (not opinions) as to why inequitieis between the CSC and VSC develop from time to time and what may be done to improve the service?

    Do you know of other people that have tried to deal with this particular issue in the past? If so, what happened or didn't happen?

    Did anyone in your support group submit a FOIA to get information about this issue - did it actually result in any information pertinent to this topic?

    Do you know of ways to approcah our Senators that are particulalry effective regarding this inequity?

    I have alrady written my first round of letters and am trying to put together an approach that might get more attention, using my personal political connections. However to do this, I need to deal with facts and constructive solutions (not a long list of bad stories). So far you have not offered any regarding the CSC/VSC issue.

    As far as "so you will have to deal with it" please understand that I love your meaningless replies - my favorite movie is One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest - and so to me this back and forth is sheer comedy. I still wonder, however, why someone who has already gone through this nightmare would come back and get in pissing matches with newbies? One of life's little mysteries I suppose.

  5. from what i have seen in two years, the ombudsmen does not have the power to do anything he can inquire about a case but he holds no real power

    if u have aggressive congressman or senators they seem to be able to get more done than ombudsmen.

    the point is really it is not in the best interest of any servicer center to fix a broken system.

    they are accountable only to them self.

    u can think they are much like the FBI and CIA above the law and only accountable with in its own agency.

    just my opinion after fighting this system for two years

    sara

    hi sara - thanks for the input, in your experience, at what point will the senator take on your case/issue?

  6. I am not going to read through this entire thread. But I would like to take a moment to address that there are some that feel that we can actually make a difference. Let me give you a brief story of our journey.

    I married in Morocco in Oct of 04. We filed for the CR1 in December of 04. My husbands interview was in Aug of 05. Sounds good so far, right? He was denied, as were many others here on VJ from the same consulate. We fought like He!!. Wrote letters, phone calls, emails, you name it we did it. Did anything in the process change? No. Do we wish this He!! on anyone else? No. Bottom line is you're banging your head against the wall. The system sucks, but we wasted our time and effort on methods that didn't work. The people that have the ability to change it, and that isn't us the little people, see this process in a different light that we do. They are trying to weed out the fraud. Sometimes it doesn't make sense to us, but they see the entire picture that we don't.

    My husband finally got his visa in Dec of 06. And that was considered speedy for a returned petition. I know someone that had their interview a month before ours and her husband just got here last month. So I guess I get a little annoyed that there are those that are whining about their normal process taking a few extra months when I see that there are those that waited years with less complaints.

    This is the process that is set in place. You have 2 choices here. Follow the process as is laid out by the USCIS/DOS or move to your fiance/spouse's country. I guess you will call me heartless because I have my husband here now. But the truth is that my spirit is broken because of this system. Post back here after you have fought the same battle that we have. Let's see if you have the same high hopes that you can make a difference.

    That's the typical "journey" if you want to bring your foreign spouse to France.

    Actually 2 years and only 2 applications would even be lucky. Your visa request is usually denied 2 or 3 times before it -may- be approved. It's very common that one single visa process lasts more than 2 years.

    Whoever takes care of your file has the entire right to deny your case without any reason. They usually say "secret government reason". You can't appeal. You can only try again, and spend the fee again, and I think there's even a delay before you can!

    And after you get approved, you'll have to deal with the immigration services more than 10 years before you get a permanent residency card... Residency card that you'll have to renew after one year at first, then 3 years then 5, and so on. It's a neverending story.

    Emmigration process in France are nothing like in the US, no nice site with online updates. You have to go to their office for real and do hours and hours of queues...

    There's no clear rules, any agent can ask you any document any time and ask you to come back.

    It's so broken and so slow that many times, people can get a one year visa that will expire in two weeks. (I've seen it through my own eyes)

    And for sure, no nice brochure "Welcome to France"...

    Whoever said that immigration procedures are much easier in Europe is very wrong...

    Most of Europe is totally closed to any kind of immigration. France is "fighting" against family immigration because it represents 80% of our immigration right now...!

    Unfortunatly, I know what you've been through. And I really know how it can break your spirit as you said.

    I did fight against my own system for 3 years, and I finally gave up. It broke our couple. During those 3 years, I never had any justification, no explanation, just denial of everything we could try.

    I actually never thought I could do this again... but when I see USCIS rules and process, it conforts me. It's nothing like what I've seen in my own country.

    Of course, it has little failures like any system, but for the most cases, everything just go fine.

    The entire world is into a "closing walls" process, I highly doubt this is going to get better anytime soon.

    For now, I just feel VERY lucky I can hope to be with my american monkey within a year.

    (F)

    As far as wisdom and guidance - Moroccoforever didn't even fill out a K-1 or provide any insight as to why there is a major discrepancy between the centers - which is what this thread is about. She seems to have had a bad experience with a consulate, which is unfortunate, but also off topic.

    You base this on one paragraph of my experience? I did file the I-129F. They lost it. I went rounds with the USCIS with that one as well. Not to mention that a returned petition goes back to the USCIS for review. So to say that my bad experience was only with the consulate is not only erroneous, but shows how little you know about this process.

    But by all means don't listen to those that have been through this process. I am just so excited to hear how all of you are going to show the government how it is done. :rofl: So far I haven't seen much.

    I really don't understand your hostility - or the other people like you in this thread. It is actually a very amusing to see you all come and put your stinky little turds (as one person wrote earlier) and wet blankets on the table and then circle the table on your moral high horse, snorting and whining.

    Question - If there are newbies that want to try and take action what difference is it to you - why continue to comment without actually saying anything pertinent to this topic? BTW - the topic is the current inequity between the CSC and the VSC. I have seen nonething constructive in what you are postiing and am not quite sure what the point of your involvement in this thread is, other than to get attention.

    Right now, what would be helpful is facts (not opinions) as to why these inequitieis develop from time to time and what may be done to improve the service. Do you have any facts? Do you know of other people that have tried to deal with this particular issue in the past? If so, what happened or didn't happen? Did anyone in your support group submit a FOIA to get information about this issue - did it actually result in any information pertinent to this topic? Do you know of ways to approcah our Senators that are particulalry effective regarding this inequity?

    If you don't have any real input, however, please continue to air your grievences and hostilities towards us or the system, we are certainly a captive audience and I find all of your responses childishly amusing in a "nana nana boo boo" sort of way.

  7. I don't think it's entirely necessary to file an FOIA to understand why the only 2 processing centers go at different speeds. Seems quite straight forward to me............one center is currently receiving more items to process than the other or those items being processed need more hands-on than normal (for example perhaps more RFE's are being sent out). At any rate, I still haven't seen anyone post their suggestions about how to make the system work more efficiently.......except for those who have added their experiences here. They give us tons of guidance on how to file the forms, what information is required, they answer our stupid questions, all so that our Visa experience goes smoother and quicker than theirs did. So, how about a little respect for those "old VJ'ers and some respect for the (I'm sure) overworked USCIS processors.

    I have never bashed the USCIS workers - nor do I intend to. As far as wisdom and guidance - Moroccoforever didn't even fill out a K-1 or provide any insight as to why there is a major discrepancy between the centers - which is what this thread is about. She seems to have had a bad experience with a consulate, which is unfortunate, but also off topic.

    RE the FOIA, hopefully things are as straightforward as you suspect regarding these centers - but if it were, this is a problem that isn't too difficult to solve (send some files over the the less inundated center when the discrepancy gets to be more than two months different) and I am not sure why it persists year after year. The reason I am asking about the FOIA is to avoid filing one if someone already has the answer from them. I think it may be possible to get farther with the Ombudsman if one's letter included some real solutions on how things could work better. I am going to approach my old MBA operations professor with the facts (if I can find them, not the "facts" that Moroccoforever refers to or the collection of bad experiences everyone posts here) and see what he has to say. My grad school, which was international, dealt with this issue all of the time and may be interested in working on coming up with a constructive solution for evening out workloads.

  8. I am not going to read through this entire thread. But I would like to take a moment to address that there are some that feel that we can actually make a difference. Let me give you a brief story of our journey.

    I married in Morocco in Oct of 04. We filed for the CR1 in December of 04. My husbands interview was in Aug of 05. Sounds good so far, right? He was denied, as were many others here on VJ from the same consulate. We fought like He!!. Wrote letters, phone calls, emails, you name it we did it. Did anything in the process change? No. Do we wish this He!! on anyone else? No. Bottom line is you're banging your head against the wall. The system sucks, but we wasted our time and effort on methods that didn't work. The people that have the ability to change it, and that isn't us the little people, see this process in a different light that we do. They are trying to weed out the fraud. Sometimes it doesn't make sense to us, but they see the entire picture that we don't.

    My husband finally got his visa in Dec of 06. And that was considered speedy for a returned petition. I know someone that had their interview a month before ours and her husband just got here last month. So I guess I get a little annoyed that there are those that are whining about their normal process taking a few extra months when I see that there are those that waited years with less complaints.

    This is the process that is set in place. You have 2 choices here. Follow the process as is laid out by the USCIS/DOS or move to your fiance/spouse's country. I guess you will call me heartless because I have my husband here now. But the truth is that my spirit is broken because of this system. Post back here after you have fought the same battle that we have. Let's see if you have the same high hopes that you can make a difference.

    I'm very sorry that the process failed you the way it did, and glad that in the end you came through and are together.

    That being said, you really haven't contributed anything here. All you've really done is thrown turds on the table.

    Perhaps nothing will come of people's efforts to change the system. Change is difficult and slow. But certainly nothing will change if everyone just resigns themselves to bending over and grabbing their ankles as you suggest.

    Nobody's hurting you by trying to make things better. So why do you act so offended when others don't accept your advice to just bend over and take it?

    You may view them as "turds on the table", but they are facts. Okay, you think you can make a difference then read through this entire thread.

    http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=3896

    This is what came from mine and a few others research on how to fix a broken system. Kiyah, Chi and I, along with many others have worked very hard just to come to the realization that there is not much one can do to change the system. It is like an ant throwing pebbles at the feet of giants. They are just brushed away. What we did accomplish, that we didn't have, was a support group that was able to provide guidance through the process. Something we didn't have. Were we pissed off? Yes, but rather than blow it out of our a$$e$ on how we can make changes we researched and found out the normal process so that we could help others going through similar situations. We didn't change the system, we just understand it better now than we did when we started.

    And please when you are done "changing the system", please come back and post your "I told you so" thread. If by chance you are able to make changes I will gladly say I was wrong.

    :thumbs:

    These last few exchanges have been inspiring - maybe all of us insolent, whining, optimists should form a new thread called "turds on the table" or "we blow it out of our a$$e$ support group" so that we can stop attracting so much pious rage from other members who are intrigued by the name of this thread but have no interest in providing constructive input. Speaking of new ideas - has anyone tried submitting a FOIA in the past to understand more about why these different centers can go at such different speeds from time to time?

  9. I am not going to read through this entire thread. But I would like to take a moment to address that there are some that feel that we can actually make a difference. Let me give you a brief story of our journey.

    I married in Morocco in Oct of 04. We filed for the CR1 in December of 04. My husbands interview was in Aug of 05. Sounds good so far, right? He was denied, as were many others here on VJ from the same consulate. We fought like He!!. Wrote letters, phone calls, emails, you name it we did it. Did anything in the process change? No. Do we wish this He!! on anyone else? No. Bottom line is you're banging your head against the wall. The system sucks, but we wasted our time and effort on methods that didn't work. The people that have the ability to change it, and that isn't us the little people, see this process in a different light that we do. They are trying to weed out the fraud. Sometimes it doesn't make sense to us, but they see the entire picture that we don't.

    My husband finally got his visa in Dec of 06. And that was considered speedy for a returned petition. I know someone that had their interview a month before ours and her husband just got here last month. So I guess I get a little annoyed that there are those that are whining about their normal process taking a few extra months when I see that there are those that waited years with less complaints.

    This is the process that is set in place. You have 2 choices here. Follow the process as is laid out by the USCIS/DOS or move to your fiance/spouse's country. I guess you will call me heartless because I have my husband here now. But the truth is that my spirit is broken because of this system. Post back here after you have fought the same battle that we have. Let's see if you have the same high hopes that you can make a difference.

    Thanks for the sermon. Despite being called a whiner by many members that are farther through their journey, I am taking action. As a result of reading all of the posts from people like you on this thread, I have promised myself that later down the road if I am embittered and pessimistic about the process, I will keep my opinions and sad story to myself and make an effort not to judge people who have come here for support or to express their frustration. There is always going to be someone somewhere out there that has a sadder story than your own (that had to walk ten miles in snow in winter to schoool), but this does not mean it is futile to take whatever actions you feel might help your cause and the broader cause if you are so inclined. Why don't we all just try to "live and let live" a little more in this thread.

  10. Rise and shine my friends. Another Friday is starting. Here I am hoping that VSC finally approve all those December and January petitions that are left so that they can turn their attention on February, March, us and so on.

    Don't worry. Our time to jump with joy will come soon. :D

    PEACE you all..............

    Good Morning All -I got a canned response to my letter to the USCIS Ombudsman. After that I sent a letter to my Congressman. Now I feel like I have done everything I can do to bring some equity to the system. The wedding will officially be cancelled on August 14 and having learned from my own stupid mistakes, I will not plan another one until we have a visa in hand. In the meantime, we decided to use Kira's ticket that we got for him to come here for a trip for me back to Moscow next month.

    As I mentioned before, I used to work for the USG. After my experience with USCIS as an outsider I look back on it in an entirely different light. Now I understand that one of the major sources of frustrations for "customers" is the lack of transparency. Decisions seem to me made within a black box with no requirement on the agency's part for a reasonable or timely explanation if processes slow down or go off track. If I ever go back to work for the USG, this experience will definitely change for the better how I interact with the public. I think most people are reasonable and if you give them a reasonable explanation, they will be patient - as I would be in this situation if the agency were to simply explain what is going on.

  11. I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception.

    You had people buy flights already? significant financial losses? There have been so many discussions here advising people to not do what you noted... There are several couples that have waited over a year to get the NOA2... betting on a visa in 7 months or less is like playing the lotto.... not a safe bet when dealing with USCIS. If VSC keeps up at this pace.. you may not get to NVC until sometime in Sept... or later... :wacko:

    I agree... Planning the wedding seven months from filing is really asking for having to reschedule. We did plan the wedding as well, but we allowed nine months, even though the VJ statistics I was looking at back then showed an average time of five months to get the visa for Germans. I didn't know back then how much the service center processing times fluctuate, and how unreliable the statistics therefore are, but I still wanted to play safe and leave more time. So we planned for October... and there was a time in June when I thought we might have to reschedule. Even though I disagree with most VJers who think you absolutely can't plan anything, since I think everyone can calculate their risks and decide to take them or not, and certain consulates are less likely to give you trouble than others, I would never have dared to gamble on the best case scenario. And retrospectively, I wish I had at least forbidden my family to book their flights from Germany early on... That really added to my stress when waiting for NOA2.

    Michele R, I would look at the Russian timelines very closely, and see how realistic getting him to the US by November is. If you see it's unrealistic, better adjust your plans now, or you'll go crazy and not enjoy the wedding planning at all. I wish you good luck. You have only waited a bit over three months, and maybe you will get lucky and be one of the first to be approved among April filers. I really hope that happens for you.

    Thanks - for the first two months of waiting it seemed realistic. Now, of course, it does not. If there is no word by Aug. 14 all bets are off given the long processing time in Moscow to follow. I have already resigned myself to this. What is funny is that I was basing my estimates on my friends' expereinces with this (I did not start taking full advantage of Igor's list until just recently to see all of the posts about the differences in these two centers). I used to live in Oregon and now understand that the reason they all got their approvals in 3 months was because they were feeding into a different center. Someone asked on the "I,m Outraged" thread how we would all feel if we did not have Igor's list and VJ - my answer was the same. Given the discrepancy between my experience and my friends' experience in Oregon - I would have figured it out. Anywho - I am not setting another date until after we have a visa in hand. At this point, there is also a good chance that I may change jobs and move back to Moscow in the fall - what to do in that situation, God only knows. I will cross that bridge if and when I get to it.

    I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception.

    You had people buy flights already? significant financial losses? There have been so many discussions here advising people to not do what you noted... There are several couples that have waited over a year to get the NOA2... betting on a visa in 7 months or less is like playing the lotto.... not a safe bet when dealing with USCIS. If VSC keeps up at this pace.. you may not get to NVC until sometime in Sept... or later... :wacko:

    I agree... Planning the wedding seven months from filing is really asking for having to reschedule. We did plan the wedding as well, but we allowed nine months, even though the VJ statistics I was looking at back then showed an average time of five months to get the visa for Germans. I didn't know back then how much the service center processing times fluctuate, and how unreliable the statistics therefore are, but I still wanted to play safe and leave more time. So we planned for October... and there was a time in June when I thought we might have to reschedule. Even though I disagree with most VJers who think you absolutely can't plan anything, since I think everyone can calculate their risks and decide to take them or not, and certain consulates are less likely to give you trouble than others, I would never have dared to gamble on the best case scenario. And retrospectively, I wish I had at least forbidden my family to book their flights from Germany early on... That really added to my stress when waiting for NOA2.

    Michele R, I would look at the Russian timelines very closely, and see how realistic getting him to the US by November is. If you see it's unrealistic, better adjust your plans now, or you'll go crazy and not enjoy the wedding planning at all. I wish you good luck. You have only waited a bit over three months, and maybe you will get lucky and be one of the first to be approved among April filers. I really hope that happens for you.

    Thanks - for the first two months of waiting it seemed realistic. Now, of course, it does not. If there is no word by Aug. 14 all bets are off given the long processing time in Moscow to follow. I have already resigned myself to this. What is funny is that I was basing my estimates on my friends' expereinces with this (I did not start taking full advantage of Igor's list until just recently to see all of the posts about the differences in these two centers). I used to live in Oregon and now understand that the reason they all got their approvals in 3 months was because they were feeding into a different center. Someone asked on the "I,m Outraged" thread how we would all feel if we did not have Igor's list and VJ - my answer was the same. Given the discrepancy between my experience and my friends' experience in Oregon - I would have figured it out. Anywho - I am not setting another date until after we have a visa in hand. At this point, there is also a good chance that I may change jobs and move back to Moscow in the fall - what to do in that situation, God only knows. I will cross that bridge if and when I get to it.

    P.S. We actually wanted to plan the whole thing for December to give ourselves a little more breathing room, then the Russian Orthodox Church said no - the last day we could get married before a very long holiday season was the day we went with.

  12. I hope you get a better response than I did, Michele. The canned response I received is below.

    Dear Sir/Madam:

    Thank you for contacting the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman (CISOMB) in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Under the authority of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the CIS Ombudsman assists individuals and employers who experience specific problems during the USCIS benefits seeking process, largely to identify problems and to formulate recommendations to improve the USCIS service.

    We believe that first hand information from individuals like you is the best source for identifying systemic problems in the immigration benefits process. Our office will consider the information you provided as we develop recommendations to improve USCIS’ practices and procedures.

    Thank you for contacting our office.

    Sincerely,

    CIS Ombudsman

    I am actually expecting the canned response. Basically, after I read the "I'm Outraged" thread, I decided that I needed to do everything I could do and let the chips fall where they may. I did not want to look back and say to myself, when I was sitting without Kira over the holidays, "maybe I should have..." I also don't believe that things will ever change unless people speak up. Maybe it is futile .. but there is also a chance that one more voice would result in a shift in priorities ... call me an optimist

    Good Luck to all you March filers - the sooner you get approved, the sooner we are next in line :-)

  13. I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception.

    You had people buy flights already? significant financial losses? There have been so many discussions here advising people to not do what you noted... There are several couples that have waited over a year to get the NOA2... betting on a visa in 7 months or less is like playing the lotto.... not a safe bet when dealing with USCIS. If VSC keeps up at this pace.. you may not get to NVC until sometime in Sept... or later... :wacko:

    yep, it was indeed wacky - wish I knew then what I know now - just discovered the forums section of this site not too long ago and was basing my estimates on people I knew personally that had much better experiences ... when I read what happened to Mara my stomach hit the floor. I will not set another date until we have the visa in hand... in the meantime I see no reason why there should be such differences in processing times, even if I don't personally benefit from any changes that may come about

  14. Yes....and the thing with the estimated timelines is just a statistic game. If VSC were truly approving petitions in 4 months then our estimated date of approval would be somewhere in August. But since the only petitions that we see approved recently are from December and January it adds to the timeline because the time to approve those were 6-7 months instead of 4. If you average those numbers then our estimated time of approval is not 4 months but 5 or a little more. Once those from March get approved AND update their info we will see our timelines move back again.

    But bear in mind. It depends on members updating their info. So the more they do it the more accurate the timelines become.

    PEACE..............

    By the way - I am posting a few links from one of yesterday's hot topics for those of us here who did not read the thread.

    In the thread below , a former service center agent describes how our applications are processed at the centers - it was fascinating

    http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...mp;#entry738208

    and here is another one about a story a couple of years back about VJ

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2801706_pf.html

    For those of you who want to try and take some action about the inequity between the VSC and CSC I am posting the letter I submitted to the USCIS Ombudsman today. Please feel free to cut and paste if you like. I used to work for the fed gov. and we had an ombudsman - she could often shake things loose if there was enough public interest.

    For those of you who are not interested, please understand that I am not trying to offend anyone or be a line-jumper. The conversation in the "I'm Outraged" thread got a little tense yesterday and I certainly don't want to disturb the peace of our April VSC group. I also posted this on all the VSC threads that precede us.

    Good Night!

    The Letter I Sumitted to the USCIS Ombudsman today:

    To Whom It May Concern:

    In April of this year I applied for a K1 visa for my finance. Because I am a resident of Virginia I was required to submit my application to the USCIS center in Vermont. Since I have applied for this visa, the processing times at the VSC have slowed dramatically (to over 180 days).

    When I contacted the USCIS today, they said that the VSC was processing applications from December 30, 2008 and that my application would not be reviewed until October 22 of this year in the best-case scenario (more than 180 days after I submitted my application). Meanwhile, residents of states that feed into the USCIS servicing center in California are being processed within 66 to 100 days.

    I find this inequity unacceptable, given that all applicants pay the same application fee. After having researched this issue, I do not think that it is caused by a difference in the efficiency of VSC employees versus CSC employees, but more likely by a misallocation of workloads vis a vis resources by either the USCIS or its subcontractor Northrop Grumman. Furthermore, I do not understand why processing times are increasing while the volume of applications is decreasing (as your office itself noted in its June 2009 report to Congress).

    Unless steps are taken to remedy this inequity immediately, which is unlikely given my conversation with USCIS today, I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception. As I am sure you are aware, these misfortunes pale in comparison to some other people standing in line at the VSC under far worse circumstances, while May and June filers begin to be approved at the CSC.

    I realize that my application is currently within the USCIS' “normal” processing time. Nonetheless, today when I called for the first time I was told that my application will be adjudicated around October 22, more than 180 days after my submission. Further, it is not "normal" for residents of one state, like Virginia, to arbitrarily receive such significantly inferior service from the USCIS than residents of California or Oregon. Why isn't the I-129F workload distributed more evenly among these centers and why can't files be sent from one center to another when one center falls significantly behind another?

    It is infuriating to see large numbers of people who filed their petitions in May and June being approved by the CSC before all of us who filed our applications in January, February, March, and April at the VSC. While I know that the memebership of the primary tracking site for I129F petitions (VisaJourney) does not comprise the entire pool of I129F applicants, its membership pool does represent a statistically valid number of applicants and it is therefore possible to ascertain broad trends in visa processing extracted from its data. On top of this, USCIS' own bulletins display the existing inequity, albeit on a more publicly digestible magnitude.

    Ironically, my fiancé is more peaceful about this issue, noting that the USCIS seems to me no more equitable or effective than its counterpart agency in his largely corrupt country of the former Soviet Union. In fact he advised me to not to send this letter, for fear of the type of retribution one would encounter in his country for voicing concerns about a what seems to be a systemic problem that no one has an interest in or incentive to correct.

    As a patriot and former federal government employee, however, I assured my fiancé that things were different in America. I sincerely hope that your office will propose and implement a long term solution to this problem, rather than simply add my letter as a tally mark on a count of "Top Ten Complaints in the Ombudsman E-Mail Box" for inclusion in an annual propaganda piece, like they would in the former Soviet Union. It is hard enough to wait six months plus for adjudication. Adding the knowledge that people in different states are waiting half the time you are for no apparent good reason is like adding salt to an open wound. I hope that future customers do not have to suffer from an inequality that does not seem too complex to solve.

  15. It's been 203 days and no answer!!!! We are still waiting, there is no update on nothing, isnt this weird? I can't log in USCIS website to see my case, can something being updated?

    FYI - I sent this letter to the USCIA Ombudsman today and have posted it on the "I'm Outraged," February, March, and April VSC threads. I used to work for the fed government and we had an ombudsman - waves of voices made a difference and shook things loose. Feel free to cut and paste if you are interested in taking action.

    To Whom It May Concern:

    In April of this year I applied for a K1 visa for my finance. Because I am a resident of Virginia I was required to submit my application to the USCIS center in Vermont. Since I have applied for this visa, the processing times at the VSC have slowed dramatically (to over 180 days).

    When I contacted the USCIS today, they said that the VSC was processing applications from December 30, 2008 and that my application would not be reviewed until October 22 of this year in the best-case scenario (more than 180 days after I submitted my application). Meanwhile, residents of states that feed into the USCIS servicing center in California are being processed within 66 to 100 days.

    I find this inequity unacceptable, given that all applicants pay the same application fee. After having researched this issue, I do not think that it is caused by a difference in the efficiency of VSC employees versus CSC employees, but more likely by a misallocation of workloads vis a vis resources by either the USCIS or its subcontractor Northrop Grumman. Furthermore, I do not understand why processing times are increasing while the volume of applications is decreasing (as your office itself noted in its June 2009 report to Congress).

    Unless steps are taken to remedy this inequity immediately, which is unlikely given my conversation with USCIS today, I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception. As I am sure you are aware, these misfortunes pale in comparison to some other people standing in line at the VSC under far worse circumstances, while May and June filers begin to be approved at the CSC.

    I realize that my application is currently within the USCIS' “normal” processing time. Nonetheless, today when I called for the first time I was told that my application will be adjudicated around October 22, more than 180 days after my submission. Further, it is not "normal" for residents of one state, like Virginia, to arbitrarily receive such significantly inferior service from the USCIS than residents of California or Oregon. Why isn't the I-129F workload distributed more evenly among these centers and why can't files be sent from one center to another when one center falls significantly behind another?

    It is infuriating to see large numbers of people who filed their petitions in May and June being approved by the CSC before all of us who filed our applications in January, February, March, and April at the VSC. While I know that the memebership of the primary tracking site for I129F petitions (VisaJourney) does not comprise the entire pool of I129F applicants, its membership pool does represent a statistically valid number of applicants and it is therefore possible to ascertain broad trends in visa processing extracted from its data. On top of this, USCIS' own bulletins display the existing inequity, albeit on a more publicly digestible magnitude.

    Ironically, my fiancé is more peaceful about this issue, noting that the USCIS seems to me no more equitable or effective than its counterpart agency in his largely corrupt country of the former Soviet Union. In fact he advised me to not to send this letter, for fear of the type of retribution one would encounter in his country for voicing concerns about a what seems to be a systemic problem that no one has an interest in or incentive to correct.

    As a patriot and former federal government employee, however, I assured my fiancé that things were different in America. I sincerely hope that your office will propose and implement a long term solution to this problem, rather than simply add my letter as a tally mark on a count of "Top Ten Complaints in the Ombudsman E-Mail Box" for inclusion in an annual propaganda piece, like they would in the former Soviet Union. It is hard enough to wait six months plus for adjudication. Adding the knowledge that people in different states are waiting half the time you are for no apparent good reason is like adding salt to an open wound. I hope that future customers do not have to suffer from an inequality that does not seem too complex to solve.

  16. Richard I could send you a copy of my NOA2. It would show their dates are completely inacurate. If it'll help I'd be happy to send it.

    Thanks Lee... I don't think anything will help really, but thank you. The system is just broken and until it is fixed they are free to respond to things like my inquiry with a form letter saying nothing.

    I had to chuckle when I saw that someone started a thread "I am outraged" and in 2 or 3 days had 130 replies... I admit, I didnt read many of the posts... just a small sample... because mainly... everyone is just like us... frustrated, angry, confused etc....

    I really do not expect to achieve anything from my letter, Lee. It just was an outlet to vent (which felt good) at least until I get a reply that says more gobbledygook.

    I am starting my efforts by working within the system - posting it for others who are interested in taking action to use. I posted this on the "I'm Outraged Thread", and also in the March 2009 VSC thread. I watch your groups to see if and how things are progressing. We used to have an Ombudsman at the office I worked at in the fed. government - if she got enough complaints things did actually shake loose.

    The Letter I Sumitted to the USCIS Ombudsman today:

    To Whom It May Concern:

    In April of this year I applied for a K1 visa for my finance. Because I am a resident of Virginia I was required to submit my application to the USCIS center in Vermont. Since I have applied for this visa, the processing times at the VSC have slowed dramatically (to over 180 days).

    When I contacted the USCIS today, they said that the VSC was processing applications from December 30, 2008 and that my application would not be reviewed until October 22 of this year in the best-case scenario (more than 180 days after I submitted my application). Meanwhile, residents of states that feed into the USCIS servicing center in California are being processed within 66 to 100 days.

    I find this inequity unacceptable, given that all applicants pay the same application fee. After having researched this issue, I do not think that it is caused by a difference in the efficiency of VSC employees versus CSC employees, but more likely by a misallocation of workloads vis a vis resources by either the USCIS or its subcontractor Northrop Grumman. Furthermore, I do not understand why processing times are increasing while the volume of applications is decreasing (as your office itself noted in its June 2009 report to Congress).

    Unless steps are taken to remedy this inequity immediately, which is unlikely given my conversation with USCIS today, I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception. As I am sure you are aware, these misfortunes pale in comparison to some other people standing in line at the VSC under far worse circumstances, while May and June filers begin to be approved at the CSC.

    I realize that my application is currently within the USCIS' “normal” processing time. Nonetheless, today when I called for the first time I was told that my application will be adjudicated around October 22, more than 180 days after my submission. Further, it is not "normal" for residents of one state, like Virginia, to arbitrarily receive such significantly inferior service from the USCIS than residents of California or Oregon. Why isn't the I-129F workload distributed more evenly among these centers and why can't files be sent from one center to another when one center falls significantly behind another?

    It is infuriating to see large numbers of people who filed their petitions in May and June being approved by the CSC before all of us who filed our applications in January, February, March, and April at the VSC. While I know that the memebership of the primary tracking site for I129F petitions (VisaJourney) does not comprise the entire pool of I129F applicants, its membership pool does represent a statistically valid number of applicants and it is therefore possible to ascertain broad trends in visa processing extracted from its data. On top of this, USCIS' own bulletins display the existing inequity, albeit on a more publicly digestible magnitude.

    Ironically, my fiancé is more peaceful about this issue, noting that the USCIS seems to me no more equitable or effective than its counterpart agency in his largely corrupt country of the former Soviet Union. In fact he advised me to not to send this letter, for fear of the type of retribution one would encounter in his country for voicing concerns about a what seems to be a systemic problem that no one has an interest in or incentive to correct.

    As a patriot and former federal government employee, however, I assured my fiancé that things were different in America. I sincerely hope that your office will propose and implement a long term solution to this problem, rather than simply add my letter as a tally mark on a count of "Top Ten Complaints in the Ombudsman E-Mail Box" for inclusion in an annual propaganda piece, like they would in the former Soviet Union. It is hard enough to wait six months plus for adjudication. Adding the knowledge that people in different states are waiting half the time you are for no apparent good reason is like adding salt to an open wound. I hope that future customers do not have to suffer from an inequality that does not seem too complex to solve.

  17. uuuuuuuuuuuffffffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!! come on vermont,,,,,,,,,take a double shot of espresso and get at least one March filer approved.........dont make me come there :devil:

    hi! strega? how are you and how's everyone??? everyone do you think its ok to call the uscis and ask if there's any update about our NOA2?

    im out of my mind!!!! im always with my SO in august for 3 weeks, and im waiting for a piece of paper called a NOA2 instead that seems will not arrive soon enough.......UUUFFAAAAA double!!! you can call all you want. they will just tell you what they tell everyone...working on 2008......they are shameless!!! CVC is on overdrive with thiers.........makes me sick!!!!i also want mine transfered, at this rate even if i start over with CVC , i might still get it quicker,,,,,,,,,why dont they send some of thier overload to CVC?? seems like it is only fair to help them catch up.....so where do you get the congressman name to complain to?? i have a child involved and its also complicated,,,,i want him to be able to start school here in september.........mamma mia. I just want to give up sometimes............good luck to you strong ones that can wait forever!!

    Strega you can start here http://www.house.gov/

    I also was hoping to have the kids start school with the other children and we start here in Atlanta in August... so that ain't happening.

    and you can't give up... it is NOT allowed :)

    I am starting my efforts by working within the system - I posted my letter to the USCIS Ombudsman on another thread, but I watch your thread closely to see if anyone in March is being processed. Copy and paste anything if you like.

    The Letter I Sumitted to the USCIS Ombudsman today:

    To Whom It May Concern:

    In April of this year I applied for a K1 visa for my finance. Because I am a resident of Virginia I was required to submit my application to the USCIS center in Vermont. Since I have applied for this visa, the processing times at the VSC have slowed dramatically (to over 180 days).

    When I contacted the USCIS today, they said that the VSC was processing applications from December 30, 2008 and that my application would not be reviewed until October 22 of this year in the best-case scenario (more than 180 days after I submitted my application). Meanwhile, residents of states that feed into the USCIS servicing center in California are being processed within 66 to 100 days.

    I find this inequity unacceptable, given that all applicants pay the same application fee. After having researched this issue, I do not think that it is caused by a difference in the efficiency of VSC employees versus CSC employees, but more likely by a misallocation of workloads vis a vis resources by either the USCIS or its subcontractor Northrop Grumman. Furthermore, I do not understand why processing times are increasing while the volume of applications is decreasing (as your office itself noted in its June 2009 report to Congress).

    Unless steps are taken to remedy this inequity immediately, which is unlikely given my conversation with USCIS today, I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception. As I am sure you are aware, these misfortunes pale in comparison to some other people standing in line at the VSC under far worse circumstances, while May and June filers begin to be approved at the CSC.

    I realize that my application is currently within the USCIS' “normal” processing time. Nonetheless, today when I called for the first time I was told that my application will be adjudicated around October 22, more than 180 days after my submission. Further, it is not "normal" for residents of one state, like Virginia, to arbitrarily receive such significantly inferior service from the USCIS than residents of California or Oregon. Why isn't the I-129F workload distributed more evenly among these centers and why can't files be sent from one center to another when one center falls significantly behind another?

    It is infuriating to see large numbers of people who filed their petitions in May and June being approved by the CSC before all of us who filed our applications in January, February, March, and April at the VSC. While I know that the membership of the primary tracking site for I129F petitions (VisaJourney) does not comprise the entire pool of I129F applicants, its membership pool does represent a statistically valid number of applicants and it is therefore possible to ascertain broad trends in visa processing extracted from its data. On top of this, USCIS' own bulletins display the existing inequity, albeit on a more publicly digestible magnitude.

    Ironically, my fiancé is more peaceful about this issue, noting that the USCIS seems to me no more equitable or effective than its counterpart agency in his largely corrupt country of the former Soviet Union. In fact he advised me to not to send this letter, for fear of the type of retribution one would encounter in his country for voicing concerns about a what seems to be a systemic problem that no one has an interest in or incentive to correct.

    As a patriot and former federal government employee, however, I assured my fiancé that things were different in America. I sincerely hope that your office will propose and implement a long term solution to this problem, rather than simply add my letter as a tally mark on a count of "Top Ten Complaints in the Ombudsman E-Mail Box" for inclusion in an annual propaganda piece, like they would in the former Soviet Union. It is hard enough to wait six months plus for adjudication. Adding the knowledge that people in different states are waiting half the time you are for no apparent good reason is like adding salt to an open wound. I hope that future customers do not have to suffer from inequality that does not seem too complex to solve.

  18. The more you know, the more you want to do something about it. pretend VJ doesn't exist. now look at your situation. what will you do? you'll have no idea what the 'normal' time frame is. so just take a chill pill and relax. mine took 7+ months for NAO2, others took 2 months. Its just how it is. its not a race to get here - and once the person gets here, no garaunty they'll love this place and no garaunty you'll both be in utopia.

    I am starting my efforts by working within the system - posting it for others who are interested in taking action to use.

    The Letter I Sumitted to the USCIS Ombudsman today:

    To Whom It May Concern:

    In April of this year I applied for a K1 visa for my finance. Because I am a resident of Virginia I was required to submit my application to the USCIS center in Vermont. Since I have applied for this visa, the processing times at the VSC have slowed dramatically (to over 180 days).

    When I contacted the USCIS today, they said that the VSC was processing applications from December 30, 2008 and that my application would not be reviewed until October 22 of this year in the best-case scenario (more than 180 days after I submitted my application). Meanwhile, residents of states that feed into the USCIS servicing center in California are being processed within 66 to 100 days.

    I find this inequity unacceptable, given that all applicants pay the same application fee. After having researched this issue, I do not think that it is caused by a difference in the efficiency of VSC employees versus CSC employees, but more likely by a misallocation of workloads vis a vis resources by either the USCIS or its subcontractor Northrop Grumman. Furthermore, I do not understand why processing times are increasing while the volume of applications is decreasing (as your office itself noted in its June 2009 report to Congress).

    Unless steps are taken to remedy this inequity immediately, which is unlikely given my conversation with USCIS today, I will be forced to cancel my wedding in November of this year. My parents will incur significant financial losses, as well as my family and friends who have already purchased tickets to attend the ceremony and reception. As I am sure you are aware, these misfortunes pale in comparison to some other people standing in line at the VSC under far worse circumstances, while May and June filers begin to be approved at the CSC.

    I realize that my application is currently within the USCIS' “normal” processing time. Nonetheless, today when I called for the first time I was told that my application will be adjudicated around October 22, more than 180 days after my submission. Further, it is not "normal" for residents of one state, like Virginia, to arbitrarily receive such significantly inferior service from the USCIS than residents of California or Oregon. Why isn't the I-129F workload distributed more evenly among these centers and why can't files be sent from one center to another when one center falls significantly behind another?

    It is infuriating to see large numbers of people who filed their petitions in May and June being approved by the CSC before all of us who filed our applications in January, February, March, and April at the VSC. While I know that the memebership of the primary tracking site for I129F petitions (VisaJourney) does not comprise the entire pool of I129F applicants, its membership pool does represent a statistically valid number of applicants and it is therefore possible to ascertain broad trends in visa processing extracted from its data. On top of this, USCIS' own bulletins display the existing inequity, albeit on a more publicly digestible magnitude.

    Ironically, my fiancé is more peaceful about this issue, noting that the USCIS seems to me no more equitable or effective than its counterpart agency in his largely corrupt country of the former Soviet Union. In fact he advised me to not to send this letter, for fear of the type of retribution one would encounter in his country for voicing concerns about a what seems to be a systemic problem that no one has an interest in or incentive to correct.

    As a patriot and former federal government employee, however, I assured my fiancé that things were different in America. I sincerely hope that your office will propose and implement a long term solution to this problem, rather than simply add my letter as a tally mark on a count of "Top Ten Complaints in the Ombudsman E-Mail Box" for inclusion in an annual propaganda piece, like they would in the former Soviet Union. It is hard enough to wait six months plus for adjudication. Adding the knowledge that people in different states are waiting half the time you are for no apparent good reason is like adding salt to an open wound. I hope that future customers do not have to suffer from an inequality that does not seem too complex to solve.

  19. Yes....and the thing with the estimated timelines is just a statistic game. If VSC were truly approving petitions in 4 months then our estimated date of approval would be somewhere in August. But since the only petitions that we see approved recently are from December and January it adds to the timeline because the time to approve those were 6-7 months instead of 4. If you average those numbers then our estimated time of approval is not 4 months but 5 or a little more. Once those from March get approved AND update their info we will see our timelines move back again.

    But bear in mind. It depends on members updating their info. So the more they do it the more accurate the timelines become.

    PEACE..............

    By the way - I am posting a few links from one of yesterday's hot topics for those of us here who did not read the thread.

    In the thread below , a former service center agent describes how our applications are processed at the centers - it was fascinating

    http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...mp;#entry738208

    and here is another one about a story a couple of years back about VJ

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2801706_pf.html

  20. I elected to start planning the wedding early in the process. I carefully examined historical data and current time lines and tried to seek out a 90% confidence level before selecting a date. Then I moved forward, contrary to advice here, before approval. I understand the desire to plan - it was important to us that we have our legal and ceremonial wedding at the same time - with all of our family around us.

    Trying to plan a wedding date is a double edged sword. Many people will mention delays, but what do you do if you have set out a conservative date of, say, October 11th - 9.5 months after you send in your I129f. What do you do if you have the visa more than 3 months before your wedding date? Are you going to move it up? (eek!) We didn't. I can tell you that for us a few months of self-imposed separation is a pain of it's own flavor, different from the unknown black hole of USCIS.

    No one ever mentions that many vendors, perhaps your dream venue included, will allow you to change dates, with enough advance notice. Ask them. Make sure it's in your contract. And, as always, be willing to loose any deposit you put down. Treat it all as gambling - don't spend what you aren't willing to loose. We didn't release any of our family members to purchase air tickets until the visa was in hand, though one cousin who was following our case closely got them as soon as we got NOA2! Argh.

    (Edit: OK, Danu did say it - while I was posting. :P)

    You're an adult. Assess your own risks, and your own ability to absorb any losses if things don't go your way. Also, I would advise you to constantly re-assess your position as the process continues. If your NOA2 is later than expected, then you need to adjust your plans accordingly. Don't ever plan to "make up the difference". Define your trade offs, and determine which ones are the most important to you, and make your decisions based on your own priorities. I listed our priorities above, and our trade off was 3.5 further months apart even though we have the visa in hand.

    Yep I did all that, planned it far in advance, Chris and I took the risk of planning it 12 months in advance, we booked our venue for August 21st this year (and sent our application last August), if you want to read my timeline below then you will totally understand that we had to heartbreakingly move it till August next year.However we are cheating, tickets to america are very pricey, so we have planned to get married when we eventually get a visa and then hold a formal ceremony August 14th next year. This might be an option you consider.

    My advice, whilst Nik and Heather were very lucky and planned it well, you may just be the exception (like us or Sara) and if you don't have the ability to risk losing that sort of money (that the average person spends on a wedding) then I would suggest you wait until you at the very least have your NOA2 or your visa.

    I echo what Mara says - I planned a wedding for late in the fall based on the USCIS reported processing times. Those have now slid and I am moving everything if I don't get the NOA2 by August 14 (which is HIGHLY unlikely at this point). While I check this site constantly - I have found the timeline data to be unreliable. First - it is only a small sample of the actual number of cases being processed. Second, it relies on members updating their timelines -which not everyone does. Third, even if there were more members and all the members updated their timelines, it is impossible to predict when the USCIS will make arbitrary action - as they recently did at the VSC where they decided to stop going forward in procssing, clean up their back-log, and assign officers to other types of visas. It is also impossible to know if your case will be the next nightmare. I am now waiting for the visa to plan when the wedding will be.

  21. WOW!!!!!! I'm really happy for you too. It all paid off at the end. And as you said....if they don't answer in 30 days someone is going to spend some vacations in the fridge.

    Congratulations to you.

    PEACE..............

    FYI to all April Filers - I called the USCIS today and they said that the best case scenario (assuming the application has no RFEs) for reviewing and approving petitions filed in April was 3 months from now (middle of October). She reiterated, as other people have already stated here, that they are focused on December applications at the moment.

  22. To the OP: If you were not ready to wait six months for your approval (which the USCIS states is the normal processing time) then you shouldn't have submitted a petition. There is no "right" to a speedy immigration process. Yes, its not fun waiting, but it is what it is.

    Trust me, after you are united with your loved one, the bad feelings will quickly fade. I was stuck at the NVC for 50 days just a few monts ago ... Simply a distant memory now.

    Again, you're missing the point. The process CAN be faster, more expeditious, more efficient. It just isn't because USCIS doesn't NEED to make it that way, mostly because most people just DEAL with it. Why would any of you want to discourage someone from trying to make a positive change in this process? It almost seems spiteful to be so discouraging, especially if you've already completed the process.

    Man this thread is frustrating to read! I think I'll stop now! :)

    just how many applications do you think they're sitting on? How many cases do you think you could clear in a day and not compromise our national security? May I remind you that there are many other types of visas that are also adjudicated at these same 2 centers. it's not just K1's. We all get in the same line and right now that line is long. Let them do their jobs. If you have some valid ways in which they could improve efficiencies in the process, please post them and let USCIS know about them.

    Hi Ovi/OP - I get what you are saying and have been surprised/amused by some of the hostility your suggestion evoked. I guess now you know that people who challenge the status quo :o - on VJ are outrageous, unpatriotic, unconfident, whiners trying to undermine our nation's security! (you know that I am kidding, I hope) Anyway, it looks like there is not much support for this on VJ (meaning no big wave of letters) and it seems like "a letter here, a letter there" doesn't work based on the advice of people that have already written and called. One of my parents worked for a Senator for many years - I am going to ask her if there is another effective/constructive approach to try. The thing that you brought up that I also want to understand/fix is the discrepancy between the centers - is this your big issue too? Let me know if it isn't. Hang in there!

  23. My god man, you have been waiting for 3 months and your outraged? My wife and I have been waiting since April 2008 for our NOA2. I have wrote letters to both Bush and Obama. I also contacted my old boss Michael Hayden for help. I have called the USCIS so many times I think I own stock in Verizon now. I have contacted my local Congressman on many occasions and all I ever hear is I am stuck in a FBI background check and as soon as I am cleared then we may proceed to the next phase. I guess this is what I get for 30 years of service to the US Goverment. Get a grip.

    I must say, you sound pretty "outraged" to me, and deservedly so. Is there a time-limit as to when you can feel this way - a mark in the sand that once you cross, you're no longer walking in sunlight and are now in the dark? If so, please list this in the user guide so the rest of us will know when we've earned the right to be indignant.

    I am outraged, this person is 3 months into the visa process and he has the nerve to be outraged? I put 30 years of my life working for the the goverment, retired and want nothing more then to spend the rest of my life with my wife only to get stuck in a FBI background check for 15 months because of my service spent in the Middle East...I am pissed off at the OP. Am I pissed off about the process? Yes I am but as someone who dedicated my life to serving the United States I understand the process has to run it's course.

    I hate to sound like a ###### but I agree with Butterboy here, we have gone as far as taking USCIS to court (which we won) and their answer after 11 months was, we will have it to you in 30 days. Chris works for a government agency, I am a Australian school teacher, never of us have ever done anything illegal in our lives, and yet we will have a NOA2 received in about 365 days of waiting, and someone waiting what 3 months is complaining, I am so sick of seeing people bitching about the immigration system on this site!

    News flash, the USA doesn't want any more people they don't want to put money into their immigration system and they won't doesn't matter how many letters or emails or protests you do, even with say 2 million americans petitioning relatives every year that is still a very very small percentage of the three hundred million american, more of half which couldn't give a damn about the Immigration system.

    Hey Mara - Congratulations to you on winning in court.

    The way I took this discussion today is that the frustration/anger is caused more by the fact that people who feed into the CSC get a much faster turnaround (barring situations like yours, of course) than people standing in line at the VSC. I have always been interested to know why this is so and it turns out that there may be some very real reasons behind this - Senator Bernie Sanders' above letter states many of these. Personally, I don't begrudge anyone living on the west coast or the better service they seem to be getting. I would, however, like for there to be a little more consistency/fairness between jurisdictions if possible. Personally, I am going to wait until the initial six month waiting period is up - until that point I don't think I have much room to complain, given how many stories like yours and Butterboy's there seem to be.

  24. Write a Letter, Call, or Visit

    Washington office

    433 Russell Senate Office Bldg

    (at Constitution and Delaware)

    United States Senate

    Washington, DC 20510

    (202) 224-4242

    Burlington office

    199 Main Street, 4th Floor

    Burlington, VT 05401

    (802) 863-2525

    1-800-642-3193

    Montpelier office

    P.O. Box 933

    87 State Street, Room 338

    Montpelier, VT 05602

    (802) 229-0569

    I have checked for the proposed Budget requests at http://leahy.senate.gov/ and there is no mention of any Vermont Service Center. He does have a section on foreign policy but not on immigration.

    I have also found the following link:

    http://justiceatuscis.org/node?page=2

    Bernie Sanders can be another one to contact.

    One interesting information is :

    http://justiceatuscis.org/node/219

    Another name to write is: Michael Aytes, the National

    Acting Deputy Director of USCIS,

    It seems that the VSC being so slow is only related to contractual negotiations and the fact that they may be closing down in the future or at least will loose many jobs.

    If we are in this site is because we decided to take matters in our own hand. So I think we can do this as well.

    http://www.northropgrumman.com/ ( they are the employeer fot the VSC workers)

    The following letter was sent to Northrop by senator Sanders: http://justiceatuscis.org/files/Letter%20F...ald%20Sugar.pdf

    Writting the DD of USCIS Michael Aytes does NOT help. I did, and got pushed off to another person. One VJer posted after he emailed Mr. Aytes, in the email was Mr. Aytes asking "How are these people getting my email?" DUH, a governemnt email is easy, first name.last name@dhs.gov

    No brainer.

    Here is a draft letter - it could be easily adjusted to send to Bernie Sanders. Interesting information posted above - particulary about the discrepancy in wages between the VSC and CSC. I will look for a fax number - if you send this stuff via snail mail it gets stuck in the x-ray machines for a month.

    Ok - here is the fax number: 202-224-3470

    One word of caution - when bureaucrats feel attacked they circle the wagons and sometimes find ways to get even - most often by stalling, spewing red tape, etc.

×
×
  • Create New...