intrakelly

Consider this. EU and America would like to marry but the EU party does not want to be made subject to PR status or greencard. Rather the EU party wants to retain plain alternative visa status thru the marriage. Marriage within the US wouldn't produce that. Already checked. Would marriage under another jurisdiction retain that status?

Please explain what you mean by "plain alternative visa" status thru marriage?

Where do the parties wish to reside?

FWIW, marriage is marriage....

What I mean is being able to enter the US on waivers or visitor visas. Point is that I do not want to be forced into a PR and/or green card status by marriage. The parties would be in the US for a season and out of the US for a season. I was thinking that marrying outside of US jurisdiction might tune out those requirements. One thing is for sure. We not desire to marry on US terrritory.

Consider this. EU and America would like to marry but the EU party does not want to be made subject to PR status or greencard. Rather the EU party wants to retain plain alternative visa status thru the marriage. Marriage within the US wouldn't produce that. Already checked. Would marriage under another jurisdiction retain that status?

Consider this. EU and America would like to marry but the EU party does not want to be made subject to PR status or greencard. Rather the EU party wants to retain plain alternative visa status thru the marriage. Marriage within the US wouldn't produce that. Already checked. Would marriage under another jurisdiction retain that status?

It really depends on where you want to live. If you want to live in the US and be married, well, you'll have to have a greencard.

Consider this. EU and America would like to marry but the EU party does not want to be made subject to PR status or greencard. Rather the EU party wants to retain plain alternative visa status thru the marriage. Marriage within the US wouldn't produce that. Already checked. Would marriage under another jurisdiction retain that status?

BE VERY BLESSED!

Consider this. EU and America would like to marry but the EU party does not want to be made subject to PR status or greencard. Rather the EU party wants to retain plain alternative visa status thru the marriage. Marriage within the US wouldn't produce that. Already checked. Would marriage under another jurisdiction retain that status?

If it's you'll enjoy the ride! Make sure that you're online with each other and things will go smoooooth!

I entered the US Christmas 2000 with an ordinary passport and a B1 visa stamp. All went well with renewals until mid 2002 because of circumstances. I have also lost the I-94. Sad, huh? Oh well, cookies do crumble. But he ain't gonna win!! I have not left the US since then to avoid barring. I recently read on this website that some people were not asked for their I-94 on exit and one of them had to only provide biometrics (computerized fingerprints) and personal data for a departure from San Francisco airport (2005). My new passport is electronic and has never been used. Does anyone know if they still require former paperwork exiting thru US-VISIT with an RFID passport?

Well! I am a woman and would make a pre-nup myself. It's for peace of mind that protection is there and the money is not gonna be abused. Does that make me love him less? No, I would help him out if I see that he helps himself. Separation of what is his and what is yours keeps everything cool. It gives love more meaning and value. Let it stand the test of time. Follow him and you may be surprised!

If you gonna have a mtg, play it cool and do not panic. Rather ask for a solution to the problem trying to make things work. It doesn't guarantee a victory but being in control and choosing yr words right impresses the most. See what I mean?

I entered the US Christmas 2000 with an ordinary passport and a B1 visa stamp. All went well with renewals until mid 2002 because of circumstances. I have also lost the I-94. Sad, huh? Oh well, cookies do crumble. But he ain't gonna win!! I have not left the US since then to avoid barring. I recently read on this website that some people were not asked for their I-94 on exit and one of them had to only provide biometrics (computerized fingerprints) and personal data for a departure from San Francisco airport (2005). My new passport is electronic and has never been used. Does anyone know if they still require former paperwork exiting thru US-VISIT with an RFID passport?

I was impressed about what one of your members said on a posting. Her I-94 was not asked for to register departure from the US at the San Francisco airport and she apparently still has it. Only index finger scans were taken and personal data to register her departure. She also received a card with a Homeland Security logo on it.

Coming to my own case, I came to the US legally on a B-1 visa thru Dallas and had several renewals taken place in the US. Due to circumstances that went beyond my control I became undocumented mid 2002. On top of that I have lost my I-94 as well. Sad story? Oh well, rather than leaving and get some kind of marginal note on my passport, so I thought, I decided to stay for whatever it would cost me. My situation hasn't changed since then. But my new passport now has an RFID chip in it and blank pages. So, if SF airport truly follows a new system of electronic data for every departing individual without requiring former paperwork, I wonder what the good chances could be of leaving the US by means of this new electronic system and then return on a waiver. It would almost sound like an undisputed amnesty. I appreciate anyone's comments.

I wonder if some of you would be able to comment to this. I became undocumented quite some time ago and have also lost the I-94. I have not been able to leave the US ever since. I recently read on this website that some people were not asked for their I-94 and one of them had to provide biometrics (computerized fingerprints) and personal data for the departure at San Francisco airport (2005). I now have a new passport with an RFID chip and nothing else in it. Does anyone know if they still investigate former paperwork once you have a new passport as explained?

I was impressed about what one of your members said on a posting. Her I-94 was not asked for to register departure from the US at the San Francisco airport and she apparently still has it. Only index finger scans were taken and personal data to register her departure. She also received a card with a Homeland Security logo on it.

Coming to my own case, I came to the US legally on a B-1 visa thru Dallas and had several renewals taken place in the US. Due to circumstances that went beyond my control I became undocumented mid 2002. On top of that I have lost my I-94 as well. Sad story? Oh well, rather than leaving and get some kind of marginal note on my passport, so I thought, I decided to stay for whatever it would cost me. My situation hasn't changed since then. But my new passport now has an RFID chip in it and blank pages. So, if SF airport truly follows a new system of electronic data for every departing individual without requiring former paperwork, I wonder what the good chances could be of leaving the US by means of this new electronic system and then return on a waiver. It would almost sound like an undisputed amnesty. I appreciate anyone's comments.