Andrewrai

dont worry about it

If you have not yet done it, contacting your congressman is one of the first things you should be doing. There is a possablity that it was lost in the mail or they lost it or forgot about it.

BTW never all USCIS they are worthless, you are suppost to wait 30 days, and not 6 Months. Just dont waste your time calling them ever again.

I was just letting everyone leting know what is up, and no I'm not claiming some big discrimination deal over it. I can understand the reasoning behide it and yes there are alot of people that mess things up for everyone. But not to say its only Vietnam, Yes Vietnam does have alot of it. But what about Russia, Cambodia, North Korea, Thailand, Singapore, and China, to name just a few. Yes the majority of all Eastern Country has a big issus with Visa Frad. But one thing does not always mean another, the reason why or at least the reason I got was because "I am not rich and she is Vietnamese" and yes this is a stuped reason because that is all that it was based on. I do have a Joint-Sponser and he is my dad for heaven Sakes, and we have alot of family support. John & Annie you have a right to say whatever you want, But how would you feel if they claimed you Frad for something similer. We all dont have the same luck in the processing of are cases and just because you are a lucky one how does this give you a right to say well I'm glad they investigaded you.

What if they were to Deport your Spouse and then someone else said the same tihng to you? I am her to give a head up to everyone and let them know what is going on and what to be perpard for. Yes it was not that big of a deal for us but it was inconvenent and unnessassory. Other people have been throught even bigger messes. Some people who are 100% in love have been deported, this is a sereous matter and just because it was cut and dry for us does not mean that everyone who are totally honest, really in love each other and want to be together for the rest of there life will be so lucky.

Immgration is a ######, I hope that everyone on this form is the real deal and if not then I hope that you really understand what your doing and how it effects other and that moving to another country is not going to turn your life around for the better. It makes it worse for most people for and yes some woman or kill this is the sad truth of it. I dont want to sound like I'm rambling on to much but I'm taking to time to give the info to people and help them out in case of the worst. Know what your getting into and be ready for the worst thing possable. Planing sould also include what if someone goes wrong.

Good luck to everyone and I pray that god is on your side!!!

Its Seattle Washingtion, and you know I have never heard about this kind of thing before ether. The only Reason that is happend was because of the Green and I dont know if you all heard but last year the was a BIG frad ring exposed invalving Vietnamese so I think that just kind of added to the whole mess (OMG She is Vietnamese and he is not Rich, lol). They have sent hunderds of people back becauase of it as well. But ya he dident even look at proof I brought. He asked me a few things then I was lead out and he talked to my wife. Ask about 10 mins or so they came out and he said that was was going to close the case and get us the interview as soon as possiable. It was pretty cut and dry but the whole thing kind annoy's me really!

We went in yesterday for what we thought was are AOS Interview and it turns out that it was far from it. It what with a frad investigater, and it was Fing BS. It had to do with some ###### about how much money I make and because she is Vietnamese. It was so stuped, but obvious we had no problems with it. He closed that case and promissed to get are AOS interview Rushed for us.

Its looks like we're not one of the lucky ones that will be approved without an interview . Are case was transferred back to are local office today to continue processing on 1-9-07. I well I guess its never going to be that easy .

How many people out there had they case transfered back to there local office and had an interview?

We Were at CSC untill today when are case was trasfered back to Seattle, looks like there is going to an interview and we are not that lucky on well. Good luck everyone ok?

Congrats Everyone!!!!!!!!

I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing no touchs or updates to the Online Stadus? The last time mine way updated was on the 23rd of September. So I have no Idea what is going on :~ it would seem to me like something would of happend by this time but I have still yet to see anything.

So is it just me or is something not working the way it should be??????????

Ahhh man this sucks our last touch was on Augest 23, 2006 CSC Touched it almost three days in a row. As far as I know there has been no more Touch's. But there online system is kind of stuped with some people so who knows.

I've been waiting since the 19th as of now.............

GO CSC! MOVE! MOVE! MOVE!

Hi everybody!

My case was also transfered to CSC... just got the e-mail yesterday. There is just one problem, I still didn't get my Biometrics appt letter I will call them on Monday again, I've complained 30 days ago because some mail was returned to them (I think is my appt letter)... I will try again.

Good luck to everybody!!

Contact Congress right away to make sure everything stays smooth and you will be fine, good luck!!!!!!!!!!!

When the medical test is done for the visa I beleve that the I-693A vaccination supplement was the document that is not completed. On course vaccination and such are completed but a I-693A is not what is filled, so regardless most people do end up having to get one done.

The same thing happend to my wife, I was very puzzaled in regards to this as well, and asking my congressman about it.

Yes I know that they could be for different things. So lets share what the CSC asked for in different peoples RFE's.

Please post any information regarding any RFE you or anyone recived here, thanks.

I would like to call upon everything who Recived RFE's from the CSC.

I think it would be most helpful for people to know the details of different Reqest for evidence that the CSC asked for.

I think that everyone with a newly transfers case would be most interested.

My wifes AOS Case was sent from Seattle to CSC today.

That makes one more!

Its really not going to cha change anything so dont worry about it as long as you married within 90 days.

Well my wife has been her for over a year and a half and we have been married for a 1 - 1/2. I talked to my sister and it seems that a SSN Not reqired for your depended. She works at a health clinic and they do see many immagrents with Medical Insurance who do not yet have a SSN, Its just best to explan why and give some kind of documentation such as Passport, Marriage Cert, Visa/I-94 and AOS Copies as well. this is what I plan to do. I will be eligable to get Medical Insurance in 4 more weeks so I'm just waiting untill then.

I am really interested in hearing from any other people who was put on Medical Insurance without the SSN, Thanks.

I'm sure nearly 90% all have medical insurance, and I'm sure that just about everyone has there immigrating husband or wife put on the insurance as well.

So what I’m trying to get at is did your immigrating Husband or wife not have a SSN and is unable to get one at this time do to some unforeseen reason or complication.

Because my wife’s passport was lost for about 3 months and we were unable to get her SSN. I’m sure that they would still have to give the medical insurance benefits regardless if you are married. But I like to worry and stress about every single detail because I’m just crazy like that.

This is all very confusing because I have seen a great deal of people that never had a interview and/or your case was transfered to a Service Center. I also see that a great deal of people are receving there green card pretty much right away. What gives with this?

From my understanding there was a two year wait until you recived a green card based on Marriage/K Visa.

Also why is it that some people never have interviews and there case is just sent off to a service center to complete processing? Does any one have any idea what is going on with USCIS? Because I'm lost as far as these details go, I really truly am.

Be ready for anything.

I used an original

I just want to give everyone working on there K Visa's from Vietnam my best wishes in the K Visa process.

My Wife came from Vietnam 1 1/2 Year ago so I know how you all feel.

I'm sorry that because of people who would do anything to get into the USA you all are hurting. I heard on the News that there is now a 3 year Backlog for K 1 Visas in Vietnam. I can’t believe the guys who Ran this whole USCIS Scam only got 3 years. It really makes me mad, and don’t get me wrong I know there are allot of Vietnamese Who come here by this way and the whole thing really makes me mad.

I am not a lawyer but I have been thought allot and with K-1 Visa's in Vietnam. If anyone is confused or needs any help what-so-ever please contact me right away and I'll do the best I can to help you but please you intend to immigrate for any other reason the spending the rest of your life with the man or woman in the US. Then please don’t bother asking me because I don’t take kindly to people who try to undermind that system, because it screws things up for the rest of us.

it may be better to contact me at my Email A.krentkowski@comcast.net because I really dont know how often I will be back to check this post.

Again best Wishes to K-1 Visa Applicants,

Does anyone have any Related Information to proforming a Motion To Reopen / Reconsider.

I have a question though... Let's say.. me being the USC, I get pregnant.. I am in college and don't have medical coverage... if I apply for assistance just to help cover the medical costs of delivering my child... does that effect the outcome of our AOS ?

From what I know here is the thing its not based on the USC from what I have seen what-so-ever I have read up on this alot and have seen alot of USC worryed about this. Its the Alien that has to worry about this not your right?

SO from what I have seen as long is it is for the USC and has Nothing to do with the Alien. Its all good, look around VJ I saw lots of people worryed just like you are.

But hey remember I'm not a Lawyer ok

If your really worryed about this email your Congressman, they are fast to get back to you.

If that does not make things clear for you or your stiff worried its on the USCIS Web site as well.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffair.../public_cfs.pdf

Becoming a Public Charge is something that you "HAVE TO REALLY WORK AT" so its best not to worry about the same things like to just keep any eye out and be smart everyone.

Source: http://www.hooyou.com/i-485/publiccharge.html

Receipt of Certain Public Benefits will NOT Render Alien a "Public Charge"

Issues concerning "Public Charge" determinations, and obligations associated with "Affidavit of Support" documents

Many aliens, who are interested in entering the United States and/or becoming Legal Permanent Residents, fear that if they or their relatives and dependents receive various public benefits from Federal government or State governments, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS, formerly the INS and briefly called the BCIS) or the Department of State (DOS) will decide they are likely to become a "public charge", and as a result, they may not get green cards. According to U.S. Immigration laws, a public charge finding may result in denial of application to adjust to Legal Permanent Resident status by the USCIS, denial of an immigrant visa to enter the U.S. by the U.S. Embassies or Consulates of DOS, or even deportation in very rare circumstances.

This article contains the following information:

* A brief history of the "public charge" policy,

* Definitions of significant terms used in determining if someone is likely to be deemed a "public charge,"

* A List of government benefits that will trigger a "public charge" consideration by the USCIS,

* A List of government benefits aliens can receive without becoming subject to a "public charge" consideration,

* Discussion of USCIS's "Totality of the Circumstances" rule,

* Effect of "Public Charge" on Admission and Adjustment of Status,

* Possibility of deportation related to "public charge"

* Repayment of received government benefits

* Receipt of Public Benefits by Spouse or Family Member,

* "Public Charge" effects various immigration petitions, such as Naturalization,

* Summary of Form I-864, Affidavit of Support-the form used to determine if an alien is likely to become a "Public Charge,"

Background

The rules that determine whether an alien is likely to become a "public charge" and the ramifications on admissibility and even deportation of such a determination have been part of U.S. immigration law for more than 100 years. An alien who is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible and ineligible to become a legal permanent resident of the United States. An alien is also deportable if he or she has become a public charge within five years after his or her date of entry from causes not shown to have arisen since entry. For deportation purposes, an immigration judge will make the final determination during removal proceeding; fortunately, deportations on public charge grounds have been very rare.

Since the mid-1990's, new immigration and welfare reform laws have generated considerable public confusion and concern about whether receipt of certain Federal, State, or local public benefits may render an alien a "Public Charge" and as a result the alien may face adverse immigration consequences. This concern has prompted some aliens, who are eligible to receive such public benefits as disaster relief, treatment of communicable diseases, immunizations, and children's nutrition and health care programs, to be reluctant to accept such benefits. This potentially causes considerable harm to these aliens and the general public. Unfortunately, the fear of being labeled a "Public Charge" and the absence of a clear definition of "Public Charge" undermines Federal Government policies designed to increase access to health insurance and health care.

In order clarify this issue and in an attempt to increase access to health care and help people become self-sufficient, the Clinton Administration published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on May 26, 1999 that describes the circumstances under which a non-citizen can receive public benefits without becoming a "public charge" for purposes of admission into the United States, adjustment of status to Legal Permanent Resident, and deportation. The 1999 Proposed Rule provided a definition for "public charge" and examples of the categories of public benefits that will not be considered in public charge consideration. The rule describes the various issues that must be considered in making a public charge determination. Although never finalized, the 1999 Proposed Rule has been incorporated in the INS's field manuals and is used by the INS (now USCIS) to make decisions concerning "public charge" issues.

It has never been the policy of the USCIS that receipt of any publicly funded services or benefits renders an alien a public charge, or indicates that the alien is likely to become a public charge. In fact, there are many federally funded benefits that aliens may receive (and are encouraged to receive, if needed) that will not render them a public charge. The nature of the public program must be considered. For instance, attending public schools, taking advantage of school lunch or other supplemental nutrition programs, or receiving emergency medical care would not make an alien inadmissible as a public charge, despite the use of public funds.

Definition of Public Charge

"Public charge" means an alien who (for deportation purposes) has become or (for admission or adjustment of status purposes) is likely to become "primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance, or institutionalization for long-term care at government expense."

This definition is stated in the INS's Field Guidance manual (now used by the USCIS). In addition, the DOS sent a similar definition of "public charge" in a cable to U.S. consulates abroad providing guidance on public charge determinations for admission purposes.

Benefits Subject to Public Charge Consideration

If at the time of application for admission or adjustment an alien is receiving a cash public assistance for income maintenance or is institutionalized for long-term care including assistance from the programs listed below, the receipt of such benefits should be taken into account in determining if an alien is like to become a public charge. However, regulations state that the determination must be made using the totality of the circumstances test (as discussed below), along with the other statutory factors. The following is a list of public benefits that may render an alien a public charge:

1. Supplemental Security Income (SSI);

2. Cash assistance from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program;

3. State or local cash assistance programs for income maintenance, often called "General Assistance" programs; and

4. Public assistance, including Medicaid, that is used for supporting aliens who reside in an institution for long-term care -- such as a nursing home or mental health institution

Acceptance of these forms of public cash assistance could make a non-citizen a public charge, if all other criteria are met under the totality of circumstances test (as described below in the section "Totality of the circumstances tests.") Please note that short-term institutionalization for rehabilitation is not subject to public charge consideration.

In addition, please note that not all cash assistance is provided for purposes of income maintenance, and thus not all cash assistance is relevant for public charge purposes. For example, some energy assistance programs provide supplemental benefits through cash payments, in addition to vouchers or in-kind benefits, depending on the locality and the type of fuel needed. Likewise, cash payments could also be provided for childcare assistance. Such supplemental, special-purpose cash benefits should not be considered in public charge determinations because they are not evidence of primary dependence on the government for subsistence.

Benefits Not Subject to Public Charge Consideration

Non-cash benefits and special-purpose cash benefits that are not intended for income maintenance are not subject to public charge consideration. Such benefits include:

1.

Medicaid;

2.

Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP);

3.

Food Stamps;

4.

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC);

5.

Immunizations;

6.

Prenatal care;

7.

Testing and treatment of communicable diseases;

8.

Emergency medical assistance;

9.

Emergency disaster relief;

10. Nutrition programs;

11. Housing assistance (including FHA loan);

12. Energy assistance;

13. Child care services;

14. Foster care and adoption assistance;

15. Transportation vouchers;

16. Educational assistance;

17. Job training programs; and

18. Non-cash benefits funded under the TANF program.

Some of the above programs may provide cash benefits, such as energy assistance, transportation or child care benefits provided in cash under TANF or the Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG), and one-time emergency payments under TANF. However, since the purpose of such benefits is not for income maintenance, but rather to avoid the need for on-going cash assistance for income maintenance, they are not subject to public charge consideration.

Totality of the Circumstances Test

An alien's mere receipt of cash assistance for income maintenance, or being institutionalized for long-term care, does not automatically make him or her inadmissible, ineligible to adjust status to legal permanent resident, or deportable on public charge grounds. The regulation requires that USCIS and DOS officials should assess the financial responsibility of the alien by examining the "totality of the alien's circumstances at the time of his or her application" by considering the alien's age, health, family status, assets, resources and financial status, education, and skills, among other factors as well. Each determination is made on a case-by-case basis.

Admission and Adjustment of Status

Before an alien can be denied admission to the United States or denied adjustment of status to legal permanent resident based on public charge grounds, a number of factors must be considered by USCIS and DOS, including: the alien's age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status, education and skills. No single factor -- other than the lack of an Affidavit of Support, if required -- will determine whether an alien is a public charge, including past or current receipt of public cash benefits for income maintenance.

Deportation

The USCIS can deport an alien on public charge grounds only if the alien has failed to meet the benefit-granting agency's demand for repayment of a cash benefit for income maintenance or for the costs of institutionalization for long-term care. The USCIS may initiate removal proceedings only if the Benefit-granting agency has:

1. The legal authority to demand repayment. In other words, the alien or designated relatives or friends must be legally obligated to repay the benefit;

2. Chosen to seek repayment within five years of the alien's entry into the United States;

3. Obtained a final judgment;

4. Taken all steps to collect on that judgment; and

5. Been unsuccessful in those attempts.

Even if these conditions are met, the alien is not deportable on public charge grounds if the alien can show that he or she received public cash benefits for income maintenance or was institutionalized for long-term care for causes that arose after entry into the United States.

Repayment of Public Benefits

The immigration laws does not request that aliens must repay benefits previously received as a condition of admission or adjustment, and they should not request proof of repayment as a condition for finding the alien admissible to the United States. Repayment is relevant to the public charge inadmissibility determination only in the circumstance of deportation on public charge grounds (as described above in the section "Deportation.")

Receipt of Benefits by Children and other Family Members

As a general rule, the receipt of benefits by a member of the applicant's family is not attributable to the applicant for purposes of determining the likelihood that the applicant will become a public charge. If, however, the family is reliant on the benefits as its sole means of support, the applicant may be considered to have received public cash assistance. This determination is to be made on a case-by-case basis and upon consideration of the totality of the applicant's circumstances.

Other Public Charge Clarifications

There is no public charge test for naturalization.

Public charge is not a factor in whether a non-citizen can sponsor a relative to come to the United States. If a non-citizen wishes to sponsor a relative to come to the United States, the relative will need to locate a financially sound US Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident to sign a Form I-864 or Form I-134 (Affidavit of Support) in order for the relative to enter the US.

Refugees and asylees remain exempt from public charge determinations for purpose of admission and adjustment of status. Similarly, Amerasian, Cuban, Haitian, and Nicaraguan immigration may be exempt from public charge in accordance with the relevant immigration acts.

Most Legal Permanent Residents who have been outside the United States for 180 days or less are not applicants for admission and therefore are not subject to the ground of inadmissibility.

Affidavit of Support Forms

A. I-864 or I-134

In any Family-based Immigration case, a petitioner must complete and submit an Affidavit of Support, Form I-864. This means that the petitioners filed or are filing a Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative or Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan as Immediate Relative. An I-864, Affidavit of Support, is also required in Employment-based Immigration only if the petitioner is a family member of the beneficiary and owns more than 5% of the business.

In other circumstances, when an Affidavit of Support is requested, a Form I-134 is applicable. This means, in most Employment-based Immigration cases, Form I-134, Affidavit of Support is acceptable.

B. I-864 and Benefits Counted

The I-864, Affidavit of Support, is a legally enforceable contract between the sponsor and the United States government. The contract exists from the time the immigrant is granted Legal Permanent Resident status for up to ten years, or until the immigrant becomes a citizen, or the immigrant completes forty qualifying quarters, whichever period is shorter. If at any point during the enforceable period, however, the immigrant receives a means- tested public benefits, the sponsor can be sued by a Federal, State or local government agency for reimbursement. Comparatively, the I-134 is not a contract, and thus the sponsor bears no such obligation as those stated in the I-864.

In the I-864, the sponsor must be a US citizen or national or have legal permanent resident status. Also, the sponsor must be at least 18 years old, reside in the US or in a US territory.

The Affidavit of Support form, Form I-864, asks whether the sponsor or a member of the sponsor's household has received means-tested benefits within the past 3 years. The purpose of this question is not to determine whether the sponsor is or is likely to become a public charge, but to ensure that the adjudicating officer has access to all facts that may be relevant in determining whether the 125-percent annual income test is met.

Any cash benefits received by the sponsor cannot be counted toward meeting the 125-percent income threshold, which are traditionally Federal means-tested public benefits including Food Stamps, Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and the State Child Health Insurance Program (CHIP). States and local jurisdictions may also designate certain of their programs as means-tested public benefits.

But receipt of other means-tested benefits, including Emergency Medicaid, short-term, non-cash emergency relief; services provided under the National School Lunch and Child Nutrition Acts; immunizations and testing and treatment for communicable diseases; student assistance under the Higher Education Act and the Public Health Service Act; certain forms of foster-care or adoption assistance under the Social Security Act; Head Start programs; means-tested programs under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act; and Job Training Partnership Act programs is not disqualifying for sponsorship purposes. Public benefit programs are increasingly available to families with incomes above 125 percent of the poverty line.

C. 125-percent Income Threshold

To be qualified as a sponsor of I-864, the sponsor must show that his/her household income is equal to or higher than 125 percent of the U.S. poverty level for your household size. The household size includes the sponsor himself/herself, the dependents, any relatives living with him/her, and the immigrants he/she is sponsoring. For example, if the sponsor has spouse and two children, and he wants to sponsor his brother and sister-in-law. The total household is six. According to the 2004 U.S. Poverty Guidelines, the sponsor's total household income must be equal or higher than $31,512. The sponsor must also include in his household size any immigrants he has previously sponsored. In the above example, if the sponsor had previously sponsored his parents, his household size would be eight persons and he would need a household income of $39,462.

If the sponsor is on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States, and the immigrant he/she is sponsoring is his/her spouse or child, the sponsor's income only needs to equal 100 percent of the U.S. poverty level for his/her family size.

For further information about 2004 Poverty Guidelines, please click here.

If the sponsors cannot meet the minimum income requirements using their earned income, they may have various options:

1. Cash Value of the Sponsor's Assets

Cash Value of the sponsor's assets, such as money in savings accounts, stocks, bonds, and property, can be added to meet the requirements. To determine the amount of assets required to qualify, subtract the sponsor's household income from the 125% of the poverty level for his/her family size. The cash value of his/her assets must be worth five times this difference.

For example:

John wishes to sponsor his parents' immigration. John and his wife's total household income in 2004 was $22,000. They have no other dependants. The total household is four, including John, his wife, John's father and mother. According to the 2004 U.S. Poverty Guidelines, John's total household income must be equal or higher than $27,537. Thus, the difference is $5,537. $5,537 times 5 is equal to $27,685. If John has $27,685 or more cash value in his assets, he is qualified to sponsor his parents.

2. Count the income and assets of members of the household who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption

To use the relative's income, the sponsors must have listed them as dependents on their most recent federal tax return or they must have lived with you for the last 6 months. The sponsors and the joint sponsors must also complete a Form I-864A, Contract between Sponsor and Household Member.

In the above example, if John's personal income was $20,000; and his wife's income is $8,000. Their total household income was $28,000, which meets the 125% of the poverty level for his family size of four, that is, $27,537.

3. Count the assets of the relatives the sponsors are sponsoring

The sponsors may also include the value of the sponsored relatives' income and assets. The immigrant does not need to complete Form I-864A unless he or she has accompanying family members.

In the above example, if John and his wife's household income was $20,000. John's parents' income was $8,000. Their total household income should be $28,000, which meets the 125% of the poverty level for his family size of four, that is, $27,537.

D. Totality Test in Reviewing I-864

The immigration law requests a totality test in reviewing I-864, although the I-864 form only requests information regarding the sponsor's income and assets. According to the immigration law, factors such as age, health, family status, assets, resources and financial status, education and skills must be examined.

For example:

In an I-130 immigration petition, where the husband, a US citizen, is sponsoring his alien wife. Both husband and wife are attending medical school and their current combined income is barely sufficient to meet the Federal Poverty Lines for their household of two.

Factors such as employability after their graduation, and education, skills, or age are essential in the totality test of immigration officer in order to make a determination on the likelihood that the alien wife will become a public charge.

If you have any "public charge" or "Affidavit of Support"-related questions, please feel free to call or e-mail our office.

--Authored by Weiqi Li and Mark E. Harrington in February 2003

Source: http://www.hooyou.com/i-485/publiccharge.html

Biometrics Fees seem to be strange for something people, maybe there are a few people that dont know what your doing at the USCIS. They sent ours back with information about them not needed it for a AOS Case based on a K1 Visa. Then later told us they needed it, it would suck if they sent back the check we sent recently. We have had a few problems as well, the most recent and the one the effected us the most is an incorrect address. Someone but Street and not South somewere when we hand a change of address. We missed out on a few RFE but it has been fixed now.

Does anyone else of Info on Biometrics Fees that may help people out?

Hey if anyone needs info or help in relations to your K1 Visa for Vietnam please ask away and I will do my best to help you out.