Jump to content

sio2usa

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sio2usa

  1. Sorry to disturb for a simple question, but my attempt to find an existing answer with keywords wasn't panning out:

    We reserved our interview appointment from the embassy via ustraveldocs, but it was not clear if the date they give, is the date of the interview and we should book tickets for the business day before for biometrics, or is it the date of the biometerics and we should book for a second day to follow for the actual interview?

    (as it was explained to me) they just give the one date on the website, and we've not (yet) received any correspondence from the embassy after the packet 4 email for me to understand more (yet). Thanks! Andrew

    Separately, we just went through our medical and we'll make a post with the latest on-the-ground findings how the website/packet information doesn't match what you actually need to bring to the medical, primarily several more photos than requested, and a photocopy of your passport's bio page.

    Cheers!

  2. TBoneTX and Darnell, thanks much for the replies! Good news is that the evolution of our relationship is well documented and separately from this letter. Agreed I don't know why the template had the middle paragraph except maybe as filler/style. Will update the community how it comes out; pretty clear that we should not send any correction at this point, but have our correct version available at the interview. Cheers, Andrew and Stephanie.

  3. Greetings,

    We are new to the forums and very happy to find this community. My fiance and I just got our first notice, and I was re-reviewing our submission packet, and found the lawyer accidentally had us sign an earlier version of my fiance's letter of intent which was only partially completed. It correctly states who we both are, and that she will marry me upon arrival, but the middle paragraph where we intended to summarize when and how we met, it is left as the original template (i.e. literally says [fill in here]").

    Our question: since the true purpose of the letter is intact and otherwise valid/signed, and they may not care, and could cause confusions/delays to submit a correction, is it best to leave it as-is? Or, is it super-critical this letter be perfect and contain details of our meeting, etc. and we should promptly re-submit? (related, is there such a thing as sending a single corrected sub-component of the I129-F application, or does the whole thing have to be re-submitted?

    Thanks for any insight! We'll upload our timeline and let the group know what kind of turn-arounds we are getting. Thanks, Andrew and Yuan.

×
×
  • Create New...