JeanneAdil

last name is not automatically changed man can even take the wife's name OR wife can hypenate the 2 names OR not change at all did you apply for SS card before your 90 days ran out? Did u get a Florida DL or state ID? if u did these , u can go to that office and make your name change OR apply to court to change it OR change it with I 485 or when u naturalize BTW totally normal our birth certificates in US list mother by maiden name not married name our marriage papers are in Maiden name of woman

Congratulations

but u did have to fill out the other parts of the ds 5535 siblings adddresses phone #'s social media sites all of the rest sometimes i think embassies do all to discourage us and to make us "just give up" Don't

May not have expired with dr office but immigration has a 6 month expiration date for medicals so u needed to redo medical exam because a visa , when issued, expires 6 months from date of the medical

1st USCIS says this When you need legal advice on immigration matters, make sure the person helping you is an attorney or an accredited representative working for a Department of Justice recognized organization. Nobody else is authorized to give you legal advice about immigration matters. https://www.uscis.gov/scams-fraud-and-misconduct/avoid-scams 2nd Nolo law advises: The lawyer can't stop USCIS from asking any of these questions, and can't answer the questions for you. In fact, you'll find that the lawyer has to sit quietly through much of the interview. Moreover, the officer might have information about you from sources other than what you provided in your application. Assume that USCIS knows almost everything about you! If the officer has any questions about whether you should get citizenship, based on information you gave or information obtained from other sources, you will need to provide truthful answers at the interview. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-expect-your-naturalization-interview.html And Hacking says: So, the great benefit of having an immigration lawyer in your interview when you're trying to get a benefit is that the lawyer knows the law. The lawyer, most likely, and hopefully, knows the law better than the immigration officers. So if things go off the rails, the lawyer can stop the interview and ask for a supervisor. The lawyer can ask you to go outside and discuss something. You can go outside of the little office where you are with the officer https://hackinglawpractice.com/bring-lawyer-to-uscis-interview/ the lawyer in this case did not carefully go over what would be asked and what would happen in interview/ could be he took the money to represent but he, himself , did not believe fully in the client(s)

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-09-09/pdf/2022-18867 the new rule goes into effect December 23, 2022 for petitions dated on that date or after its 168 pages of read and i have read and reread as it's like all other legal documents a hard read /goes back and forth from the 1999 rule to the 2019 rule to this new one what i do get out of it is the following Under the INA, noncitizens are inadmissible and therefore (1) ineligible for a visa, (2) ineligible for admission, and (3) ineligible for adjustment of status, if, in the opinion of DHS (or the Department of Justice (DOJ)) or consular officers of the Departments of State (DOS), as applicable),2 they are likely at any time to become a public charge.3 While the statute does not define the term ‘‘public charge,’’ it does provide that in making an inadmissibility determination, administering agencies must ‘‘at a minimum consider the alien’s age; health; family status; assets, resources, and financial status; and education and skills.’’ 4 The agencies may also consider an Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA submitted on the noncitizen’s behalf when such is required. bottom of page 4 into 5 details the non citizen'd health, family, assets, and education and what will determine "totality of circumstances the September 9, 2022 final rule for Public Charge Ground of inadmissibility makes an attempt to define "public charge" page 5. DHS is amending 8 CFR 213.1, relating to the acceptance of public charge bonds. With these amendments, DHS is: • Adding a new paragraph specifying that USCIS may invite adjustment of status applicants who are inadmissible only under section 212(a)(4) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4), and whose applications are otherwise approvable, to submit a public charge bond in USCIS’ discretion and clarifying that USCIS will set the bond amount and provide instructions for submission of the bond; • Modifying the existing