peejay

What about liberals that are anally obsessed with homosexuals and homosexual issues and habitually post pro-homosexual topics?

What about liberals that are anally obsessed with homosexuals and homosexual issues and habitually post pro-homosexual topics?

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Obama? HA!!
The thread should be titled: Foreign Oil Dependency Down to 45% from 57% in 2008 in spite of Obama
Anyone that knows anything about the oil business knows these projects are years in the making and were being formulated well before Obama.
Unfortunately the rotten fruit that will be born from Obama's fvcked up energy policies won't hit until well after he is kicked out in the 2012 election.

Illegal aliens aren't "immigrants". They are illegal aliens.
Quit feeding them and it is a moot point.

George H.W. Bush calls Mitt Romney ‘the best choice’ in 2012 campaign
By Holly Bailey
Senior Political Reporter | The Ticket – 21 hrs ago
Mitt Romney has picked up a major, if still unofficial, endorsement in his bid for the Republican presidential nomination.
Former President George H.W. Bush told the Houston Chronicle he believes Romney is the best candidate in the race—though he stopped short of officially endorsing his 2012 bid.
"I think Romney is the best choice for us," Bush told the Houston Chronicle. "I like Perry, but he doesn't seem to be going anywhere; he's not surging forward."
The ex-president, who is personally close to Romney, praised the former governor's "stability, experience, principles."
"He's mature and reasonable—not a bomb thrower," Bush said, adding that he didn't mean to besmirch anybody in the field. "I've got to be a little careful, because I like Perry; he's our governor."
Yet Bush wasn't nearly as kind about Newt Gingrich, admitting that he knows the former House speaker well and isn't a fan. "I'm not his biggest advocate," he said.
Bush's support of Romney isn't that surprising. In an interview with CNN's Larry King last year, he and his wife, Barbara, praised Romney, saying he would make a "very good president."
Romney has worked hard to woo the Bush family over the years. Four years ago, most of the Bush family, including the former president and his son Jeb, supported John McCain—though they waited to endorse until after Romney had dropped out of the race.
Earlier this month, Romney traveled to Houston, where he visited the former president and first lady.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/bush-41-calls-romney-best-choice-2012-presidential-193528855.html

John Cornyn warns Attorney General Holder not to mess with Texas voter ID law
Texas Sen. John Cornyn sent a clear message to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder this afternoon: Don’t mess with Texas’ voter identification law.
“Voter identification laws are constitutional and necessary to prevent fraud at the ballot box,” Cornyn said.
The San Antonio Republican, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made his comments hours before Holder is scheduled to speak at the Lyndon B. Johnson Library in Austin. Holder is planning to criticize “voter ID” laws passed by Republican legislatures in states including Texas.
Democrats say the laws are designed to reduce minority voter turnout in the 2012 election. But Cornyn said President Obama is the one who’s politicizing the issue.
“Facing an election challenge next year, this administration has chosen to target efforts by the states to protect the democratic process,” Cornyn said. “They would do well instead to focus on job creation, the economy, and reducing our national debt.”
http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2011/12/john-cornyn-warns-attorney-general-holder-not-to-mess-with-texas-voter-id-law/

I still don't believe this is the original intent of the 14th Amendment.
No other industrialized welfare state (except Canada) is stupid enough to allow this lunacy.

Steven would like the gullible, ignorant, and stupid to believe that without birthright citizenship all these children of illegal aliens and birth tourists would be stateless. That is total nonsense. Fact is these children are the citizens of the country of origin of their parents.

Obama can't get enough Undocumented Democrats into the USA if there any deterrents. Once they are here they have little or no fear of deportation unless they murder, rape, or commit felony theft. Everything else is ignored.

As I stated earlier, the original intent of the 14th Amendment was not to grant citizenship to hordes of children of illegal aliens or temporary visitors in the jet age. Not to mention that the USA (and the world) has changed quite a lot since 1868. According to the following article it was passed to ensure that freed slaves and their children were not disenfranchised. In any event this interpretation giving birthright citizenship is outdated and not in the best interests of the USA (which borders a third world country).

As I stated earlier, the original intent of the 14th Amendment was not to grant citizenship to hordes of children of illegal aliens or temporary visitors in the jet age. Not to mention that the USA (and the world) has changed quite a lot since 1868. According to the following article it was passed to ensure that freed slaves and their children were not disenfranchised. In any event this interpretation giving birthright citizenship is outdated and not in the best interests of the USA (which borders a third world country).

I still don't believe this is the original intent of the 14th Amendment.
No other industrialized welfare state (except Canada) is stupid enough to allow this lunacy.

Immigration and population growth: Ting
Published: Sunday, October 23, 2011, 6:55 AM
By JAN TING
In a time of increasing environmental consciousness and concern over economic inequality, the theory that the U.S. should seek a perpetually expanding economy and population must be challenged. According to a study by the Pew Research Center, the U.S. population is projected to grow to 438 million by 2050 if all present trends continue, an increase of 129 million over the 2010 census count of 309 million. Most of the population growth over the next 40 years will be attributable to post-2010 immigrants and their descendants, with only a small portion attributable to the natural growth of the 2010 baseline population.
How will we provide good jobs, good educational opportunities, good health care, and good housing for 129 million additional residents given our current track record? How many more vehicles will be added to our highways? How many more millions of barrels of oil will we have to import from the Middle East, or extract from deep-water wells drilled into the ocean floor? How many more millions of tons of coal will have to be burned, or nuclear power plants launched, to generate electricity for another 129 million people?
In recent years the U.S. has been admitting approximately 1 million legal immigrants every year, mostly based on family connections, which is more than the number of legal immigrants admitted to any other country. If we count only those receiving comparable permanent residence and a clear path to full citizenship, the U.S. admits more legal immigrants than all the nations of the world combined. In addition, illegal immigrants have succeeded in violating U.S. immigration law so that the illegal immigrant population in the U.S. is estimated to be around 11 million.
The demographic challenges affecting Social Security and Medicare should not be addressed by further increasing the current historically high level of legal immigration to the U.S., which would only increase the eventual demands on those programs and aggravate other social problems. Instead our legal immigration program should be more narrowly focused on admitting immigrants who are most likely to make contributions to solving our challenges.
We should expand preferences for immigrants holding advanced degrees in science, technology, and engineering, or with demonstrated ability in business management. We should disfavor those with low levels of skills and education who are least likely to make contributions and most likely to burden our economy with their problems. We should favor young immigrants with many years of work ahead of them to contribute to our economy, and we should disfavor the middle-aged and elderly. We should favor immigrants who have demonstrated an ability to learn and work using the English language, which makes their future success more likely. We should not admit any immigrants based on family relations except for spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens and legal immigrants.
We should vigorously enforce our immigration laws against violators. We should focus like a laser on getting unemployed and underemployed Americans back to work. I reject the idea that any job is too hard or too dirty for American workers to do. American workers just expect and demand to be paid a decent wage.
When employers say they can't find any American workers to do their jobs, so they have to hire illegal immigrants, they mean they can't find any American workers at the low wage level that they want to pay, but that immigrant workers will accept low wages and poor working conditions. If cheap immigrant labor is made unavailable, employers can hire Americans at a higher wage, or replace low-wage immigrant workers with technology and automation, which will create a smaller number of skilled jobs for Americans.
Besides taking jobs from American workers, illegal immigration creates huge economic burdens on our health care system, our education system, our criminal justice system, our environment, our infrastructure, and our public safety. It breeds disrespect for American law, and it insults the millions of qualified legal immigrants still waiting patiently outside the U.S. for their chance to immigrate legally.
Finally, we should reject the notion of a temporary "guest" worker program to exploit low-wage immigrant labor for a few years before forcing their return to their home countries. America has always regarded our legal immigrants as future citizens, with equal protection under the Constitution from the moment of their admission. We should adhere to that concept and refuse to emulate Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich non-democracies dependent on exploitable, vulnerable, and disposable temporary foreign labor.
Ting is a Professor of Law at Temple University's Beasley School of Law and a former Assistant Commissioner for Refugees, Asylum and Parole, Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice. Jan can be reached at janting@temple.edu
http://www.nj.com/hudson/voices/index.ssf/2011/10/immigration_and_population_gro.html

What you fail to ignore is that these deportations are in spite of the fact that we have this assclown as president rather than because he is president. If we had a president that did not obstruct the law the deportations and illegals voluntarily fleeing back home would be astromomical to the puny numbers we now have.

What you fail to ignore is that these deportations are in spite of the fact that we have this assclown as president rather than because he is president. If we had a president that did not obstruct the law the deportations and illegals voluntarily fleeing back home would be astromomical to the puny numbers we now have.

These people are not immigrants...they are illegal aliens. This is not an "immigration" law...it is an anti-illegal alien law.

What about the lazy black people? There is a much higher percentage of blacks unemployed and on welfare. If you are going to pick and choose who you slam, how about slamming the worst offenders?
But, that is beside the point altogether.
If you cared to educate yourself you will find that in many industries heavily infiltrated with illegal aliens (except agriculture), the majority of workers in those industries are Americans. In many instances the main reason for hiring illegal aliens is to drive down wages and relax the standards for working conditions.
Americans will work for decent wages, benefits, and working conditions. What do you think America did before the illegal alien invasion? It's all about cheap labor and cheap votes to benefit the rich and powerful in this country. The vast majority of the American people are getting screwed in the deal.

What about the lazy black people? There is a much higher percentage of blacks unemployed and on welfare. If you are going to pick and choose who you slam, how about slamming the worst offenders?
But, that is beside the point altogether.
If you cared to educate yourself you will find that in many industries heavily infiltrated with illegal aliens (except agriculture), the majority of workers in those industries are Americans. In many instances the main reason for hiring illegal aliens is to drive down wages and relax the standards for working conditions.
Americans will work for decent wages, benefits, and working conditions. What do you think America did before the illegal alien invasion? It's all about cheap labor and cheap votes to benefit the rich and powerful in this country. The vast majority of the American people are getting screwed in the deal.

Funny how President Obama has so many relatives here in the USA that are illegal aliens with deportation orders. No surprise that he is also an illegal alien cheerleader. No surprise he has recently stopped illegal alien deportations. Are we seeing a pattern here?