Jump to content
ellis-island

New Article on Consular Denials

 Share

40 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Vietnam
Timeline

For those who are interested, "Immigration Daily" has just published an article of mine about consular denials of K-1 visas and an interesting process of more or less "automated" findings of misrepresentation. It is here.

I've written it from a more or less neutral perspective. "Just the facts, M'aam."

It will change the way a lot of lawyers & petitioners file I-130 & I-129F petitions.

I've known some of this stuff for a long time. But there is other information in the article

I've only just learned.

Edited by ellis-island

Don't bet your whole future on what you read

on a message board or in a chat room.

This is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is intended.

You should not infer one.It's information of general applicablity.

Do not take any action without first consulting a qualified immigration attorney in greater detail.

John Marcus "Marc" Ellis, Attorney

American Immigration Lawyers (AILA)

membership number 10373

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline

Yes very informitive imformation. thanks

5-2005/ met online

11-4-2005/ went to see him in republic of georgia

11-25-2005 returned home

01-17-2006/ sent I129F to <!--WORD2URL-01--><!--END WORD2URL-01-->nsc<!--WORD2URL-02--><!--END WORD2URL-02-->

01-23-2006/ packet was recieved and signed for

01-23-2006 / NOA 1

01-26-2006/ check was cashed

01-31-2006/ recieved NOA 1 in mail

03-23-2006/ NOA 2 - oh yeah

03-27-2006/ touched

03-30-2006/ recieved NOA 2 in mail

04-07-2006-petition was sent to nvc

04-19-2006/petition got entered into nvc system recieved case number

05-30-2006/ interview date ( yahoo)

05-30-2006/he was put on a/p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Pakistan
Timeline

Thank you for the link. The article was very interesting reading.

Everything I respond to is from personal knowledge, research or experience and I am in no means a lawyer or do I claim to be one. Everyone should read, research and be responsible for your own journey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link. I haven't seen you post for awhile, welcome back (if you were gone!)

usa_fl_sm_nwm.gifphilippines_fl_md_clr.gif

United States & Republic of the Philippines

"Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid." John Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
For those who are interested, "Immigration Daily" has just published an article of mine about consular denials of K-1 visas and an interesting process of more or less "automated" findings of misrepresentation. It is here.

I've written it from a more or less neutral perspective. "Just the facts, M'aam."

It will change the way a lot of lawyers & petitioners file I-130 & I-129F petitions.

I've known some of this stuff for a long time. But there is other information in the article

I've only just learned.

Very interesting dynamics. You noted some of the potential red flags that could result in a returned petition would be..

Quoting from your article http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0323-ellis.shtm

1. A very brief courtship followed by a plunge into matrimony;

2. A marriage ceremony arranged only a short time after petitioner arrives in the beneficiary’s country and they meet for the first time;

3. No common language;

4. Petitioner resides with family members of the beneficiary in the US;

5. Petitioner is employed by or has a business relationship with a relative of beneficiary;

6. Petitioner submits phone records that show he uses a residential phone number that is listed in the name of another person.

7. US divorce followed very quickly by an engagement to foreign beneficiary is often a red flag for consular officers.

8. There is little or no documentary evidence of the relationship prior to the actual engagement.

9. Long gaps of time between the petitioner & beneficiary being together in person.

10. Failure to disclose previous marriages;

11. Failure to disclose previous petitions filed on behalf of other beneficiaries.

Some of the above are addressed in the questions on the petition, but some are not exactly answers to the petition questions. So, if there is a potential red flag, and you recommend apprising DHS of it in the petition, are you recommending that this information become part of the narrativce of a cover letter?

Edited by diadromous mermaid

"diaddie mermaid"

You can 'catch' me on here and on FBI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline

Just out of curiosity...it mentions "Long gaps of time between the petitioner & beneficiary being together in person"....what is considered as long gaps of time? Most of us can't be together every weekend or every month.

Teaching is the essential profession...the one that makes ALL other professions possible - David Haselkorn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Pakistan
Timeline

I hit about 3 of those red flags. :crying: We didn't have a long courtship and i just got divorced in september. But my marraige i just got out of lasted 22 years so hopefully maybe that will help i don't know.

5-2005/ met online

11-4-2005/ went to see him in republic of georgia

11-25-2005 returned home

01-17-2006/ sent I129F to <!--WORD2URL-01--><!--END WORD2URL-01-->nsc<!--WORD2URL-02--><!--END WORD2URL-02-->

01-23-2006/ packet was recieved and signed for

01-23-2006 / NOA 1

01-26-2006/ check was cashed

01-31-2006/ recieved NOA 1 in mail

03-23-2006/ NOA 2 - oh yeah

03-27-2006/ touched

03-30-2006/ recieved NOA 2 in mail

04-07-2006-petition was sent to nvc

04-19-2006/petition got entered into nvc system recieved case number

05-30-2006/ interview date ( yahoo)

05-30-2006/he was put on a/p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Romania
Timeline

Yea I hit 2 of the red flags, I havent seen my fiance in a year and 2 months and that was because when I left in Feb of 05 i was 6 months pregnant and now i dont want to take my son on a plane so young, and my divorse wasnt final until 4 months BEFORE filing the petition, tho it was the SEVENTH time i filed for the divorse in 10 years, i hope they take that into thought as I wrote it in a letter.

Edited by Ionescu

vj2.jpgvj.jpg

"VJ Timelines are only an estimate, they are not actual approval dates! They only reflect VJ members. VJ Timelines do not include the thousands of applicants who do not use VJ"

IF YOU ARE NEW TO THE SITE, PLEASE READ THE GUIDES BEFORE ASKING ALOT OF QUESTIONS. THE GUIDES ARE VERY HELPFUL AND WILL SAVE YOU ALOT OF TIME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Egypt
Timeline

For those who are interested, "Immigration Daily" has just published an article of mine about consular denials of K-1 visas and an interesting process of more or less "automated" findings of misrepresentation. It is here.

I've written it from a more or less neutral perspective. "Just the facts, M'aam."

It will change the way a lot of lawyers & petitioners file I-130 & I-129F petitions.

I've known some of this stuff for a long time. But there is other information in the article

I've only just learned.

Very interesting dynamics. You noted some of the potential red flags that could result in a returned petition would be..

Quoting from your article http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0323-ellis.shtm

1. A very brief courtship followed by a plunge into matrimony;

2. A marriage ceremony arranged only a short time after petitioner arrives in the beneficiary’s country and they meet for the first time;

3. No common language;

4. Petitioner resides with family members of the beneficiary in the US;

5. Petitioner is employed by or has a business relationship with a relative of beneficiary;

6. Petitioner submits phone records that show he uses a residential phone number that is listed in the name of another person.

7. US divorce followed very quickly by an engagement to foreign beneficiary is often a red flag for consular officers.

8. There is little or no documentary evidence of the relationship prior to the actual engagement.

9. Long gaps of time between the petitioner & beneficiary being together in person.

10. Failure to disclose previous marriages;

11. Failure to disclose previous petitions filed on behalf of other beneficiaries.

Some of the above are addressed in the questions on the petition, but some are not exactly answers to the petition questions. So, if there is a potential red flag, and you recommend apprising DHS of it in the petition, are you recommending that this information become part of the narrativce of a cover letter?

DANG......#7 has me freaking out. I was separated for many years, met my fiance online, then filed for divorce after having to borrow the money for an attorney. My divorce was actually finalized when I was in Egypt last July. Hope that don't cause a problem! :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Vietnam
Timeline

What I have listed, I have seen on NOIR & NOID letters sent by DHS to petitioners.

These letters normally quote the consular return memo.

I have also seen some of these on the letters that USCGHCMC mails to petitioners.

To my knowledge, USCGHCMC is the only consulate that actually mails the petitioner

a letter explaining the reasons for the denied K-1. IMHO, more consulates should be

following that example.

In my experience, these are not normally stand-alone reasons used to justify denials.

But they're definitely red flags that cause consular officers to look deeper into a case.

And I have definitely seen these reasons used in NOID & NOIR letters sent by DHS.

Consular officers in this forum are probably in a better position to comment on that.

The important part of the article is the part that describes the misrepresentation trap

that exists for visa applicants. It's my opinion that DOS doesn't need to go that far.

There is an element of "willfulness" that DOS needs to look at, before making a finding

of "misrepresentation". I don't think they're giving "willfulness" the careful consideration

it deserves.

But I'm just a lawyer. I don't make policy decisions. DOS needs to look at that though.

Edited by ellis-island

Don't bet your whole future on what you read

on a message board or in a chat room.

This is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is intended.

You should not infer one.It's information of general applicablity.

Do not take any action without first consulting a qualified immigration attorney in greater detail.

John Marcus "Marc" Ellis, Attorney

American Immigration Lawyers (AILA)

membership number 10373

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Jamaica
Timeline

I have a question for you if you dont mind

My concern from you article is no evidence of relationship before engagement

Here is the situation me and my fiance are both holiness Born-again Christian. I met my fiance in October 05, He goes to the same church I go, its just his is located in Jamaica. In other words we dont belive in the typical boyfriend.girlfriend type stuff. When someone approaches someone they are interested in, it is with the intention that they are interested in marrying and would like a chance to get to know you more and pray about it to see if a marriage is possible. Also the court-ship to marriage is not long. Normally around 6 months. So when me and my fiance met at a church event in Jamaica, of course we both new it was interest in marriage, and then we would build a non-sexual relationship and see if we are compatable. IN OTHER WORDS...THERE was never a real Drop on one knee and propose kindah thing.

Do u think I can run into a problem?

2/1/2010- AOS , EAD. AP Mailed via USPS priority mail

2/3/2010- Received - via USPS delivery tracking

2/9/2010- Check Cashed

2/9/2010- NOA 1 Received for 131, 765, 485

2/17/2010- Received letter for biometrics

2/19/2010- Completed biometrics via early "walk in'

2/22/2010- Touched on I-765, 48

2/24/2010- Case transferred to CSC

4/2/2010 Card Production Ordered for I-765, AP touched (Yea!!)

4/8/10- Approval notice for I-765 sent via email/ AP touched

4/10/2010 Received AP.

4/12/10 Received EAD-

7/6/10 Contacted USCIS because now Outside normal processing time

7/23/10 Got RFE asking for proof of legitimate marriage- 1page and 1/4 of proofs

8/23/10 sent off RFE response via Expressmail

8/24/10 Received by CSC

9/2/10 Email from USCIS- Card Production Ordered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

That list is things that MIGHT cause a problem... not that necessarily WILL cause a problem. I only spent two weeks with my fiance after we were engaged and we never lived together - he asked me to marry him before we'd ever set eyes on each other.

I'd say that you don't need to panic about this... but if your relationship contains any of the 'red flag' situations you need to be ready to counter them with extra evidence.

Karen - Melbourne, Australia/John - Florida, USA

- Proposal (20 August 2000) to marriage (19 December 2004) - 4 years, 3 months, 25 days (1,578 days)

STAGE 1 - Applying for K1 (15 September 2003) to K1 Approval (13 July 2004) - 9 months, 29 days (303 days)

STAGE 2A - Arriving in US (4 Nov 2004) to AOS Application (16 April 2005) - 5 months, 13 days (164 days)

STAGE 2B - Applying for AOS to GC Approval - 9 months, 4 days (279 days)

STAGE 3 - Lifting Conditions. Filing (19 Dec 2007) to Approval (December 11 2008)

STAGE 4 - CITIZENSHIP (filing under 5-year rule - residency start date on green card Jan 11th, 2006)

*N400 filed December 15, 2011

*Interview March 12, 2012

*Oath Ceremony March 23, 2012.

ALL DONE!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Vietnam
Timeline
That list is things that MIGHT cause a problem... not that necessarily WILL cause a problem. I only spent two weeks with my fiance after we were engaged and we never lived together - he asked me to marry him before we'd ever set eyes on each other.

I'd say that you don't need to panic about this... but if your relationship contains any of the 'red flag' situations you need to be ready to counter them with extra evidence.

That's correct. It leads to two important questions.

WHEN & WHERE do you counter those red flags with evidence...or at least with explanations?

The best time & place to do that is when you file the petition with DHS.

If you read Practice Tip #1 in that article, you'll know why.

Don't bet your whole future on what you read

on a message board or in a chat room.

This is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is intended.

You should not infer one.It's information of general applicablity.

Do not take any action without first consulting a qualified immigration attorney in greater detail.

John Marcus "Marc" Ellis, Attorney

American Immigration Lawyers (AILA)

membership number 10373

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

That list is things that MIGHT cause a problem... not that necessarily WILL cause a problem. I only spent two weeks with my fiance after we were engaged and we never lived together - he asked me to marry him before we'd ever set eyes on each other.

I'd say that you don't need to panic about this... but if your relationship contains any of the 'red flag' situations you need to be ready to counter them with extra evidence.

That's correct. It leads to two important questions.

WHEN & WHERE do you counter those red flags with evidence...or at least with explanations?

The best time & place to do that is when you file the petition with DHS.

If you read Practice Tip #1 in that article, you'll know why.

Thank you for this suggestion. This topic has been discussed at great length lately and there have been many differing opinions as to the breadth of evidence that should be submitted with the I-129F petition. In light of recent consular activity in Morocco, I have suggested that perhaps is it prudent to give more information than explicitly required by the I-129F submission, especially for those petitioners who have one or more red flags in their case. The "less is more" camp insists that you should not submit any more than is asked for.

I think your article proves them wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...