Jump to content

27 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

asdasdasd.png.a6e73f662d2dc730db94bb2d8946b83f.png

I had filed my application on 12/15/2022, but due to having two expired forms, the USCIS sent it back to me. Now I found out they released a new form I-485 with this question about Public charge.

It is my understanding that since I'm applying as a immediate relative (U.S. Citizen spouse), I would indeed be subject to the Public charge ruling. This is making me really scared since I have a joint sponsor.

My question would be how is this affecting applicants from inside the United states? Has anybody heard of marriage green card applicants (AOS)  being denied during the interview part?

I have been working and supporting myself for the past 6 years in the USA, never used any type of benefits and never even been to a Hospital.

Edited by joaovily
Posted
1 hour ago, joaovily said:

asdasdasd.png.a6e73f662d2dc730db94bb2d8946b83f.png

I had filed my application on 12/15/2022, but due to having two expired forms, the USCIS sent it back to me. Now I found out they released a new form I-485 with this question about Public charge.

It is my understanding that since I'm applying as a immediate relative (U.S. Citizen spouse), I would indeed be subject to the Public charge ruling. This is making me really scared since I have a joint sponsor.

My question would be how is this affecting applicants from inside the United states? Has anybody heard of marriage green card applicants (AOS)  being denied during the interview part?

I have been working and supporting myself for the past 6 years in the USA, never used any type of benefits and never even been to a Hospital.

Then the answer is no

Posted
4 hours ago, joaovily said:

asdasdasd.png.a6e73f662d2dc730db94bb2d8946b83f.png

I had filed my application on 12/15/2022, but due to having two expired forms, the USCIS sent it back to me. Now I found out they released a new form I-485 with this question about Public charge.

It is my understanding that since I'm applying as a immediate relative (U.S. Citizen spouse), I would indeed be subject to the Public charge ruling. This is making me really scared since I have a joint sponsor.

My question would be how is this affecting applicants from inside the United states? Has anybody heard of marriage green card applicants (AOS)  being denied during the interview part?

I have been working and supporting myself for the past 6 years in the USA, never used any type of benefits and never even been to a Hospital.

Your answer is no, then jump to question 69

K1 2017

Aos sent April 2018

Aos interview July 2018

Work permit September2018

Aos approved July 24, 2019.

Roc April 27, 2021

Biometric reused june 28, 2021

N-400 online April 27, 2022 base on 3 years rule, biometric reused.

N-400 interview on December 12, 2022 combo interview i-751. Approved.

January 11, 2023 oath ceremony, Indianapolis. After that done with uscis😂🤭🤫

I took my oath ceremony in Indianapolis, it was a nice ceremony, where people from 35 coutry become american citizen.

01/11/2023 officially done with uscis :)

🤣

January 13, 2023 apply for us passport.( regular service).

March 11, 2023 passport in hand

Posted
2 hours ago, mytruelove18 said:

Your answer is no, then jump to question 69

This is confusing, according to one of the guides on uscis website, it says that anyone applying through a immediative relative is subject to the public charge of inadmissibility. Unless you are amerisian or under some other special case then you wouldnt be subject. The wording of the question is confusing, makes you think if you never used benefits you are not subject. But come to find out i was subject. Well i could be wrong, but i already submitted the form yesterday saying i was and answerd the following up questions about how i never used benefits. This comes into effect tomorrow so its really new. Hopefully it doesnt affect anything

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

Answer is still no

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
1 hour ago, joaovily said:

here is what i found through uscis website

they are considering that if theres a slight possibility of you having used benefits you are considered subject. I hope this clarifies

You are reading it correctly and Yes was / is the correct answer. Being subject to the rules of public charge does not affect you negatively if you have NOT used any public benefits.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Family said:

You are reading it correctly and Yes was / is the correct answer. Being subject to the rules of public charge does not affect you negatively if you have NOT used any public benefits.

 

It felt weird saying yes, but its what they are telling you through the website, it’s a weird ruling, since most people will never use benefits. Hopefully other people that are also DIYing their way through AOS can find this thread.

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Family said:

I need to correct my position. The answer is NO , you are not subject to the inadmissibility rule since you have not used any public benefits. 
 

but the question is not if you used benefits, you can still be subject to the public charge, just because you MIGHT be eligible for benefits, they do ask if you use any benefits later on. 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, joaovily said:

but the question is not if you used benefits, you can still be subject to the public charge, just because you MIGHT be eligible for benefits, they do ask if you use any benefits later on. 

Several people have already said that the answer is no. You’re not inadmissible because you did not use public benefits. Immediate relatives are subject to it IF they have indeed used public benefits (immediate relatives are not exempt from this just because they’re relatives of US citizens - that’s what the USCIS chart you posted is about). If you really want to put yes, you can do that since that’s your petition. But that would be an incorrect answer that would bring extra unnecessary attention to your petition. 

Edited by powerpuff

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, joaovily said:

Anyways, i am not too focused if the answer is yes or no, since i already said yes, it is what it is.But my question is how is this impacting people at the time of interview, does anybody know about that?

It came into force today.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
1 hour ago, powerpuff said:

Several people have already said that the answer is no. You’re not inadmissible because you did not use public benefits. Immediate relatives are subject to it IF they have indeed used public benefits (immediate relatives are not exempt from this just because they’re relatives of US citizens - that’s what the USCIS chart you posted is about). If you really want to put yes, you can do that since that’s your petition. But that would be an incorrect answer that would bring extra unnecessary attention to your petition. 

I appreciate all the attention, i made this post after i had already put the package in the mail, so i cant go back and redo my answers. 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...