Jump to content
dazedandconfused2

Married to US Citizen, left to visit Canada but now denied re-entry to the US by CBP officer -- Help!

 Share

115 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Just now, vtstang66 said:

I had a border agent call me and threaten my wife with a 5-year ban over the phone because he said she was visiting too much.  She never overstayed her tourist visa or did anything illegal, but he had a suspicion that she was abusing her visa and "living here.". These people are no joke, they take their jobs seriously and once they make a decision there isn't much we can do about it.  You're acting like this person should just roll the dice like there aren't serious consequences.

you don't see me so you cannot even know how I m acting. Officers can threaten you with whatever. They could also tell an immigrant to sign a paper at the border and give up their immigration status, those who don't know the law will believe and sign, those who know the law, won't.  Your wife could've misunderstood him after all, the officer might have just said if she overstays she can receive a  ban. I didn't hear what was said, so I won't be the one to believe fast things people say on the internet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MYOB said:

It doesn't matter what the conversation was. The border between the US and Canada is closed.  Anyone focusing on that the OP told the truth as opposed to lying is missing the boat.  In the eyes of the law, they already lied after entering the US on a 6 month waiver for the purpose of getting married; even if that wasn't the original intent.

absolutely not. It is not prohibited to get married in the United States on a tourist visa. The person who married, returned back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lenchick said:

absolutely not. It is not prohibited to get married in the United States on a tourist visa. The person who married, returned back.

It's not prohibited IF the OP didn't intend to do it; otherwise they technically committed visa fraud.  Either way, it's frowned upon and considered a strike.  This will likely hold up their CR-1 and God forbid if they attempt to enter again with some weak list of grievances about keys and clothing.

Edited by MYOB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
15 minutes ago, Lenchick said:

you don't see me so you cannot even know how I m acting. Officers can threaten you with whatever. They could also tell an immigrant to sign a paper at the border and give up their immigration status, those who don't know the law will believe and sign, those who know the law, won't.  Your wife could've misunderstood him after all, the officer might have just said if she overstays she can receive a  ban. I didn't hear what was said, so I won't be the one to believe fast things people say on the internet. 

I heard what he said.  The point is that they pass judgment based on what they believe and we suffer the consequences.  You may be right, OP may be able to successfully argue their case and secure passage at the border.  But if not....it's a huge gamble.  We all have to weigh the various advice we get here and elsewhere and make our best decisions, then live with the results.

Edited by vtstang66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vtstang66 said:

I heard what he said.  The point is that they pass judgment based on what they believe and we suffer the consequences.  You may be right, OP may be able to successfully argue their case and secure passage at the border.  But if not....it's a huge gamble.  We all have to weigh the varying advice we get here and elsewhere and make our best decisions, then live with the results.

In other words, don't rely on VJ for legal advice.  Get a lawyer already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sammisauras said:

I highly recommend having her enter to visit you, and take appropriate steps to make her a temporary resident while you complete all your processes.

I'm not sure if you've heard, but the border between US and Canada is closed due to a pandemic.  Neither spouse is qualified under any immigration process in either country anyhow, because no paperwork was filed according to the OP's original post.  The last thing they need are more entry denials.

Edited by MYOB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Administrative action has been applied against the account of a poster who violated this provision of the site's Terms of Service:

 

"Condone or instruct, either directly or indirectly, others on how to commit fraudulent or illegal immigration activities in any way, shape, manner or method."

 

The wrongful information has been corrected in-thread, and the corrections are educational enough that the offending post and quotes of it will not be removed.

 

TBoneTX

for VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The OP has received all the advice that we can provide without repeating the same.  Accordingly, this thread is now locked.  Do not restart or revisit this topic.

 

Thread is moved from the AOS forum to General Immigration Discussion, because adjusting status is not the real issue.

 

VJ Moderation

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...