WH Chief Of Staff: Ex-FBI Officials In ‘Real Trouble’ After Reviewing Durham Investigation Documents

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Keep digging,  the truth will find its way to the public.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/wh-chief-of-staff-ex-fbi-officials-in-real-trouble-after-reviewing-durham-investigation-documents

 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

As much as I want to buy into the hype as it means there is some hope for accountability, because of the open corrupt relationships these people have (particularly with those in oversight bureaus/divisions) and seeing serious crimes in prior administrations (Bush and Obama) go unpunished, it's something I'll believe when I see and not a minute sooner. Do not buy the hype. Falling for hype means they don't need to deliver results. 

Edited September 9, 2020 by Burnt Reynolds

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

[laylalex 7,245]

18 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

This pic isn't showing up for me btw.

 

Why is the White House chief of staff seeing documents in an open investigation? That doesn't sound right to me.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

12 minutes ago, laylalex said:

This pic isn't showing up for me btw.

 

Why is the White House chief of staff seeing documents in an open investigation? That doesn't sound right to me.

Think Lucy holding a football...

 

You are not asking the right question.  The one we should all be asking is... why are so many corrupt people leading this country, and what can we do to hold them accountable for their illegal actions?

[laylalex 7,245]

That is a separate question, and one that many ask of those leading our country right now. We can ask more than one question at the same time.

 

My understanding is that it is not proper protocol, if it actually happened. https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/wh-chief-of-staffs-comments-on-durham-investigation-stoke-fears-of-highly-inappropriate-coordination/ I think Meadows is being vague here on purpose, honestly, because Durham does not seem like an idiot to me who rejects norms to show evidence before he is allowed to.

[Dashinka 23,201]

20 minutes ago, laylalex said:

That is a separate question, and one that many ask of those leading our country right now. We can ask more than one question at the same time.

 

My understanding is that it is not proper protocol, if it actually happened. https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/wh-chief-of-staffs-comments-on-durham-investigation-stoke-fears-of-highly-inappropriate-coordination/ I think Meadows is being vague here on purpose, honestly, because Durham does not seem like an idiot to me who rejects norms to show evidence before he is allowed to.

Of course Meadows is being vague, what else would you expect?

[laylalex 7,245]

8 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Of course Meadows is being vague, what else would you expect?

Why is he making it sound like he was involved in something that would not be proper? I expect people leading this nation to abide by rules. I do.

[Dashinka 23,201]

40 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Why is he making it sound like he was involved in something that would not be proper? I expect people leading this nation to abide by rules. I do.

Wasn't Meadows privy to some of the documents Durham may be using when Meadows was in the House?

[laylalex 7,245]

1 hour ago, Dashinka said:

Wasn't Meadows privy to some of the documents Durham may be using when Meadows was in the House?

Maybe, and then Meadows could have an opinion about those, don't see what't wrong with that. What I do have a problem with is him making it seem like there is more there there, if you know what I mean. Also, I kind of put more trust in Durham (an accomplished and distinguished lawyer) to know what is or is not a crime than Mark Meadows, who is not a lawyer (and who lied about his educational qualifications in the past, saying he has a bachelor's degree, I do not forget that).

[Dashinka 23,201]

10 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Maybe, and then Meadows could have an opinion about those, don't see what't wrong with that. What I do have a problem with is him making it seem like there is more there there, if you know what I mean. Also, I kind of put more trust in Durham (an accomplished and distinguished lawyer) to know what is or is not a crime than Mark Meadows, who is not a lawyer (and who lied about his educational qualifications in the past, saying he has a bachelor's degree, I do not forget that).

So you would call out Adam Schiff for what he has been doing for the past three plus years?

Edited September 9, 2020 by Dashinka

[Neonred 3,444]

4 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Think Lucy holding a football...

 

You are not asking the right question.  The one we should all be asking is... why are so many corrupt people leading this country, and what can we do to hold them accountable for their illegal actions?

Wouldn't surprise me to see this drag out until after the election with the hope that Trump will be gone and this whole mess can be swept under the rug and forgotten.  All the corrupt Washington insiders get a pass and life for the elite political ruling class returns to normal.

Edited September 9, 2020 by Neonred

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

5 hours ago, laylalex said:

This pic isn't showing up for me btw.

 

 

I forgot everyone is not on Platinum plan 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

Maybe, and then Meadows could have an opinion about those, don't see what't wrong with that. What I do have a problem with is him making it seem like there is more there there, if you know what I mean. Also, I kind of put more trust in Durham (an accomplished and distinguished lawyer) to know what is or is not a crime than Mark Meadows, who is not a lawyer (and who lied about his educational qualifications in the past, saying he has a bachelor's degree, I do not forget that).

we have just spent the better part of 4 years on nothing burgers, fake impeachments, Russian whoo dooery. Really ?

[laylalex 7,245]

6 hours ago, Dashinka said:

So you would call out Adam Schiff for what he has been doing for the past three plus years?

 

4 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

we have just spent the better part of 4 years on nothing burgers, fake impeachments, Russian whoo dooery. Really ?

I don't like shifting goalposts or engaging in whataboutism. I had some questions, but what I got was "look over there."