Jump to content
laylalex

Is anyone watching the debates tonight and tomorrow?

 Share

1,276 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Just now, luckytxn said:

OK but it is baseball playoffs for us here and we are playing Yankees and that is way more important. Repeat, a Texas team is playing Yankees.

PLEASE beat the Yankees. I am in your corner!!!!

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, laylalex said:

Let me know how Tulsi Gabbard looked. :lol: 

She looked stunning. My 6 year old thought that she looked very pretty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cyberfx1024 said:

She looked stunning. My 6 year old thought that she looked very pretty

I am transfixed by her GLEAM.

 

I'd love to see her in a Cabinet position. I like her conviction and experience.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, elmcitymaven said:

I am transfixed by her GLEAM.

 

I'd love to see her in a Cabinet position. I like her conviction and experience.

I say again that she is the ONLY Democrat I can see voting for at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I say again that she is the ONLY Democrat I can see voting for at all

I don't think she's "cooked" enough to be President, but I think it's no fluke she's up there tonight. She has more right to be up there than Beto, in my opinion. Give her another 4-8 years and I think she could be a very serious contender.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny that Kamala is talking about Assault Weapons on the street but you don't see people from Boyle Heights, Sylmar, or South Central use their firearms everyday, and they have real fully automatic weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmcitymaven said:

I don't think she's "cooked" enough to be President, but I think it's no fluke she's up there tonight. She has more right to be up there than Beto, in my opinion. Give her another 4-8 years and I think she could be a very serious contender.

Naw I think she is the right one right now but the DNC ain't having it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Naw I think she is the right one right now but the DNC ain't having it.

Well, she's younger* than me, so I tend to think she's a whippersnapper. If I knew she would have an outstanding suite of advisors around her, maybe.

 

*Only just.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Kamala weak, Warren is my favourite Native American candidate. 

 

Beto is well Beto

 

 

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Kamala weak, Warren is my favourite Native American candidate. 

 

Beto is well Beto

 

 

Kamala -- I bet she is FUN to get trashed with on a girls' night in. I can see the two of us in our silk jim-jams and floaty peignoirs, drinking margaritas and watching a selection of terrible rom-coms from the late 90s/early 00s. I bet she tells dirty jokes. It would be kind of awesome. And although I was originally Team Kamala, I am not any longer. I still like her a lot, but she doesn't have my vote.

 

Again what I said about Beto -- he's one of a type, a type I am familiar with. Sufficient family money to let him coast along on being mediocre but saying the "right things." Twenty years ago I probably would have bought his malarkey but now I am old (not too old, mind you, still no wrinkles) to be that much of a fool. But if we were doing F/M/K with candidates, he'd still be my F, I'm sorry to say. :cry:Warren would be my M (I'm sure she's an amazing cook) and my K would be Biden.

30 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

190731212922-40-cnn-detroit-deabte-0731-

Glistening.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
5 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

She looked stunning.

Tulsi deserves to be elected purely because she has redeemed the wearing of white pantsuits by presidential candidates.

She keeps winning debates (q.v. Drudge) but never increases her polling numbers.

If she's able to hang on till the Hawkeye Cauci, who knows what might happen.

5 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

God I hate Beto

Beeto O'Dork fight song:

 

Beeto, Beeto [dumb bum dumb bum]

Beeto, Beeto [dumb bum dumb bum]

 

Gonna have to drop Sen. Cruz a postcard, thanking him for defeating that arm-flailing nitwit in the last election.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...