Green New Deal: Ocasio-Cortez aims to make air travel obsolete, aid those ‘unwilling’ to work

[Unidentified 2,930]

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

[Póg mo 1,749]

28 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

That's all they have. Childish memes, and a world view based on ignorance, and half-truths. 

[Boiler 43,430]

42 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

Actually I agree.

 

I think it says much more about the society we have become, the Media we have when somebody like this can attract so much attention, I know how she got in, basically the Activists control the nomination process and in rotten boroughs whoever gets that nod gets in.

[refugee 169]

1 hour ago, ALFKAD said:

Have you looked at what caused the previous five ice ages, and subsequent warming of the planet?  I'm guessing one could draw some fairly accurate observations from that, if one were interested. 

I did not ask for guesses and fairly accurate observations,  I asked for scientific proof that refutes what 97% of climate studies on the subject show.

[refugee 169]

13 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Actually I agree.

 

I think it says much more about the society we have become, the Media we have when somebody like this can attract so much attention, I know how she got in, basically the Activists control the nomination process and in rotten boroughs whoever gets that nod gets in.

She actually won the nomination by fighting the existing power structure of the local democrats. It is to the credit of her and her supporters that they overcame the party inertia.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

1 hour ago, ALFKAD said:

Have you looked at what caused the previous five ice ages, and subsequent warming of the planet?  I'm guessing one could draw some fairly accurate observations from that, if one were interested. 

 

   In doing so, one should also immediately observe that the time frame over which such previous changes occurred would be measured in millennia, not decades. Therein lies the problem.

[refugee 169]

1 hour ago, Unidentified said:

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

It has been common to label women crazy when they do not fall into peoples expectations one threaten the status quo. The woman is articulate, attractive and passionate,  everything that threatens reactionary forces, hence she must be stoped.

[Póg mo 1,749]

As I suspected, the claim that AOC wants to ban air travel in ten years is not at all true.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Unidentified said:

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

Yes, there is no reason to attack her based on her looks.  She’s actually pretty IMO.  Her crazy ideas may nullify that, but hopefully she will come to her senses and suggest feasible, attainable goals we can all get behind.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

12 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   In doing so, one should also immediately observe that the time frame over which such previous changes occurred would be measured in millennia, not decades. Therein lies the problem.

Thank you for backing me up.  Not only the years over which temps changed, but also the range of said temps.  We are quibbling about 1.5~2°, when in millennia past, temps fluctuated 20° or more.  I don’t see us headed towards oblivion just yet.

 

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

21 minutes ago, refugee said:

I did not ask for guesses and fairly accurate observations,  I asked for scientific proof that refutes what 97% of climate studies on the subject show.

I wasn’t offering guesses.  The data is out there, it is up to you to decide which of it you opt to believe.

[Boiler 43,430]

15 minutes ago, refugee said:

She actually won the nomination by fighting the existing power structure of the local democrats. It is to the credit of her and her supporters that they overcame the party inertia.

Crowley, I thought he was doomed when he got the HRC nod.

 

It was prime territory, very low voter turnout and he had walked it for 14 years, took it as a given. Quite a fascinating campaign.

[Unidentified 2,930]

12 minutes ago, refugee said:

It has been common to label women crazy when they do not fall into peoples expectations one threaten the status quo. The woman is articulate, attractive and passionate,  everything that threatens reactionary forces, hence she must be stoped.

It is 2019. Men need to stop shaming women just because they feel insecure about themselves and therefore can't handle powerful women. 

[refugee 169]

10 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

I wasn’t offering guesses.  The data is out there, it is up to you to decide which of it you opt to believe.

You have offered no scientific evidence , climate scientists correlate the changes in this chart to industrial co2 emissions. What does your evidence show? 

 

[jg121783 3,907]

1 hour ago, Unidentified said:

It is one thing to say that someone has crazy ideas and another to shame someone for their looks. There is nothing wrong with her, she's not on drugs. She is happy. And I am pretty sure those comments would not have happened if she was a man. 

Give me a break. This has nothing to do with her being a woman. Typical leftist virtue signaling. There are many men I would ask the same question about. I simply posed a question (different from an accusation) based on how she looked in the photo AND based on her actions. Is she on drugs? I have no idea. Does she act and look like she is on drugs? In my opinion possibly.