New Poll: US Military Occupations Supported By Far More Democrats Than Republicans

[jg121783 3,907]

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/new-poll-us-military-occupations-supported-by-far-more-democrats-than-republicans-95cd361ee659

 

I don't know anything about this website but the politico poll they link to seems to back up what they are saying in the article. It seems many on the left are only anti war when it suits them politically. I suppose you could also argue that most republicans are only pro war when it suits them politically. Personally I have been anti war since Bush regardless who is in office.

Edited January 13, 2019 by jg121783

[refugee 169]

23 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/new-poll-us-military-occupations-supported-by-far-more-democrats-than-republicans-95cd361ee659

 

I don't know anything about this website but the politico poll they link to seems to back up what they are saying in the article. It seems many on the left are only anti war when it suits them politically. I suppose you could also argue that most republicans are only pro war when it suits them politically. Personally I have been anti war since Bush regardless who is in office.

I can be "anti war" and "pro troops". One if my biggest objections is Congress passes resolutions to mobilize troops, but drags it's feet taking care of the families at home and the vet's that return.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Are you surprised that the left opposes Trump?  I am not.

[refugee 169]

8 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Are you surprised that the left opposes Trump?  I am not.

Not just "the left"

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, refugee said:

Not just "the left"

Are you saying dems are on the right now?  When did that switch take place?

 

Trump wants to pull out of Syria.  50% of democrats oppose that.  26% support it.  Not sure what you are trying to say here?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

We did have 8 years of peace under nobama , must have because he got the Nobel Peace prize. 

 

I wonder if Obama is still relevant, just making sure we can mention him 

[jg121783 3,907]

2 hours ago, refugee said:

I can be "anti war" and "pro troops". One if my biggest objections is Congress passes resolutions to mobilize troops, but drags it's feet taking care of the families at home and the vet's that return.

I am anti war (unless the war is fought specifically to defend our country against an outside threat) because I am pro troops. Most of them sign up to defend our nation and I think it is wrong when they are sent off to fight for the profits of the military industrial complex or for other nations who don't want to put their own military in harm's way.

[refugee 169]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

We did have 8 years of peace under nobama , must have because he got the Nobel Peace prize. 

 

I wonder if Obama is still relevant, just making sure we can mention him 

Yes , the best President in this Century.

[Merle 458]

44 minutes ago, refugee said:

Yes , the best President in this Century.

Lol

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

3 hours ago, refugee said:

Yes , the best President in this Century.

Lol using what criteria??? 

[Neonred 3,446]

4 hours ago, refugee said:

Yes , the best President in this Century.

🤮

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

6 hours ago, refugee said:

Yes , the best President in this Century.

You realize you just threw away any credibility you had by saying this, right?  *smh*

[refugee 169]

 

 

14 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

You realize you just threw away any credibility you had by saying this, right?  *smh*

Dude, I am in a forum where Infowars is posted as a news source and the nytimes is dirided as fake news. Did you ever think we were that close in credibility gaps?

[Dashinka 23,230]

9 hours ago, refugee said:

 

 

Dude, I am in a forum where Infowars is posted as a news source and the nytimes is dirided as fake news. Did you ever think we were that close in credibility gaps?

Infowars?  I cannot remember the last time anyone posted anything from Infowars.  As to the NYTimes, heck, even their former editor said they were dealing in fake news reporting and headline writing.  Everyone, including what used to be considered valid news sources are only interested in getting that all important click from the snowflake crowd.

[refugee 169]

9 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Infowars?  I cannot remember the last time anyone posted anything from Infowars.  As to the NYTimes, heck, even their former editor said they were dealing in fake news reporting and headline writing.  Everyone, including what used to be considered valid news sources are only interested in getting that all important click from the snowflake crowd.

Didn't take me too long to find this