'Give us $50,000 each to go home': Caravan migrants march to the US consulate in Tijuana, Mexico, demanding US government let them in or pay them off(edited)

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

If we do not like the law that provides for folks to request asylum, then change the law.  That is Trumps real goal.  He wants to rile folks up over the current law.

I am 100 % certain that if we process the claims in an orderly fashion, we will find the bad actors.

you quoted my response but did not answer my question, I asked if an asylum seeker takes payment to return home and forgo asylum, is he truly an asylum seeker or opportunistic?

[Crazy Cat 39,222]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/caravan-migrants-show-selves-be-bunch-blackmailers/

[Dashinka 23,242]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

If we do not like the law that provides for folks to request asylum, then change the law.  That is Trumps real goal.  He wants to rile folks up over the current law.

I am fine with anyone attempting to claim asylum at a valid POE.  I am not happy with being able to break the law by crossing the border illegally (without inspection) and then being able to claim asylum and therefore residing in the US with a promise they will now follow the law.  However, that is the law and most likely it will not change, hence the need for the wall to reduce the illegal border crossers and funnel everyone to the legal POEs to make their application.

 

[TBoneTX 43,058]

Shortsightedly, the U.S.'s immigration/border policies were fashioned around the long-time focus:  unaccompanied Mexican men seeking work.

Edited December 12, 2018 by TBoneTX

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

16 minutes ago, refugee said:

If we do not like the law that provides for folks to request asylum, then change the law.  That is Trumps real goal.  He wants to rile folks up over the current law.

I am 100 % certain that if we process the claims in an orderly fashion, we will find the bad actors.

So if you dont like private ownership of guns, you would agree we change the 2nd amnd? 

[refugee 169]

12 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

you quoted my response but did not answer my question, I asked if an asylum seeker takes payment to return home and forgo asylum, is he truly an asylum seeker or opportunistic?

"I am here in your fine country to apply for asylum because I fear for my safety due to the political climate in my home, or I will accept 50 K and withdraw my request"  

Agent

"Rejected, Next"

Just now, The Nature Boy said:

So if you dont like private ownership of guns, you would agree we change the 2nd amnd? 

Who says I don't like private ownership of guns?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

"I am here in your fine country to apply for asylum because I fear for my safety due to the political climate in my home, or I will accept 50 K and withdraw my request"  

Agent

"Rejected, Next"

Who says I don't like private ownership of guns?

I never said that 

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

"I am here in your fine country to apply for asylum because I fear for my safety due to the political climate in my home, or I will accept 50 K and withdraw my request"  

Agent

"Rejected, Next"

thank you, we agree then, illegal immigrant, not asylum seeker 

[refugee 169]

1 minute ago, The Nature Boy said:

So if you dont like private ownership of guns, you would agree we change the 2nd amnd? 

How did my response to your question appear before you asked it?  I must by a tachyon.

[Crazy Cat 39,222]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

"I am here in your fine country to apply for asylum because I fear for my safety due to the political climate in my home, or I will accept 50 K and withdraw my request"  

Agent

"Rejected, Next"

and an effective wall and/or military presence would prevent "Mr. Rejected Applicant" from then just illegally crossing our border.

[refugee 169]

Just now, Randyandyuni said:

thank you, we agree then, illegal immigrant, not asylum seeker 

yeah, thats why we have a process.  Let's process these folks. 

 

You can send 15,000 troops and take away from real border patrol efforts or you could deploy 1000 agents to gather these claims and process them and be done with it.  

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

Just now, missileman said:

and an effective wall and/or military presence would prevent "Mr. Rejected Applicant" from then just illegally crossing our border.

no but it would make an effective determination of the veracity of said applicants asylum claim 

[refugee 169]

1 minute ago, missileman said:

and an effective wall and/or military presence would prevent "Mr. Rejected Applicant" from then just illegally crossing our border.

that is a theory

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

yeah, thats why we have a process.  Let's process these folks. 

 

You can send 15,000 troops and take away from real border patrol efforts or you could deploy 1000 agents to gather these claims and process them and be done with it.  

and then we do not agree ... acceptance of cash to forgo asylum shows the true motivation of attempting the border to be financial not persecution based 

[Crazy Cat 39,222]

1 minute ago, refugee said:

that is a theory

Not a theory at all.......