Jump to content
Dashinka

Harvard grad student told to move out after roommates find her legally owned firearms 'uncomfortable'

 Share

87 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Satisfied said:

You're making me mad.  Please report yourself.  ;)

Just finished a 9 hour drive for a 5 minute appointment (thanks USCIS!), and was only replying during rest stops (which were frequent with a 37 week pregnant wife).

 

I meant to say that I don't INTEND. But I'm not perfect ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
47 minutes ago, elmcitymaven said:

Hiiiiiieeeeeeee -- legal drive by from the maven (JD, summa cum laude) here! Bar review is underway.

 

Most of what has been said by bcking and Steeleballz on the legal issues is pretty much spot on. It appears that under the terms of the settlement, if the tenant with the gun refuses to leave, she will be stuck with the entire $6000/month. Those are almost certainly the terms of not only the settlement agreement, but also the lease. When you sign a residential tenancy agreement with co-tenants, you generally must agree that you are jointly and severally liable for the entire rent due under the term. So, if the other two tenants move out, them's the breaks.

 

Could she sue the other two tenants? Yeah! The best place to start would be with intrusion upon seclusion, which is a tort. In general, people have the right to a private life. Pecuniary damages are not necessary to support a cause of action for the invasion of privacy. 

 

In order to prove intrusion upon seclusion, the plaintiff must show that the defendant intruded upon a place where the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of seclusion, and a reasonable person would find the intrusion highly offensive. People have a reasonable expectation of seclusion in their bedrooms, and a reasonable person would find that others going through their personal effects without consent highly offensive. Damages are for embarrassment, mental anguish, etc. and can include punitive damages. 

 

It's a high enough profile case now that some chump will be delighted to take it.

 

Peace out from Barprepistan! <insert ululation here>

 

PS: glad to see my drive-by brother, spooky.:wub:

If you decide to move out you certainly can not say goodbye to your contractual responsibilities. Like you said jointly and severally.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boiler said:

If you decide to move out you certainly can not say goodbye to your contractual responsibilities. Like you said jointly and severally.

Yeah, it's like an I-864 when you get a divorce and you've gotten someone to co-sponsor with you! :lol: 

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
2 hours ago, bcking said:

Just finished a 9 hour drive for a 5 minute appointment (thanks USCIS!), and was only replying during rest stops (which were frequent with a 37 week pregnant wife).

 

I meant to say that I don't INTEND. But I'm not perfect ;)

I knew precisely what you meant.  After all, I am fluent in NBese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
21 hours ago, Chris Duffy said:

My roommate back in Austin Texas had plastic explosive he used to blow stuff up with.

The landlady was showing a prospective tenant a dingy room with badly spotted wallpaper.  "This is a very nice room," she declared.  The last man who lived here was an inventor -- he invented some kind of explosive."

 

"I see," said the prospective tenant.  "And I suppose that the spots on the wall are the explosive?"

 

"No," corrected the landlady, "they're the inventor."
 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
7 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

JD, summa cum laude

[T-B. bows to Her Legalship]

7 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

The best place to start would be with intrusion upon seclusion, which is a tort.

Sue the reprehensible tortfeasors*!

*all-time favorite word, along with "springbok" and "yak"

7 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

Peace out from Barprepistan!

Let's see your passport and valid visa now, see ma'am.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
6 hours ago, bcking said:

If the legal world included more zingers like "intrusion upon seclusion", I would have more strongly considered a career in law.

Let's see here:

 

Law has Intrusion Upon Seclusion and Tortfeasors.

Cardiology has Pheochromocytoma and Echinococcus Granulosus.

 

You win, si man.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
6 hours ago, bcking said:

37 week pregnant wife

Time flies!  Full report in public or private, please.

And, get ready:  neither of you will sleep for the first 3 years...

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Time flies!  Full report in public or private, please.

And, get ready:  neither of you will sleep for the first 3 years...

Naw I'll get some sleep...

 

On call :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
2 hours ago, bcking said:

Naw I'll get some sleep...

 

On call :)

Great.  Another doctor making life decisions while trying to keep his eyes open on rounds with a large cup of CafPow! In his hand.  🤣

 

This is why I don’t go to hospitals (nor car dealers, but that is for different reasons).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Great.  Another doctor making life decisions while trying to keep his eyes open on rounds with a large cup of CafPow! In his hand.  🤣

 

This is why I don’t go to hospitals (nor car dealers, but that is for different reasons).  

Believe me, I don't like our system any more than you do. I think the only reason it works is because we generally have so much redundancy (at least in big centers where I've worked). I'm very hesitant to work in small hospitals where I may be literally the only person and I may be operating on no sleep in 24 hours. Where I'm at now we have very seasoned/experienced nurse practitioners, excellent nurses we can trust who are all operating on a more normal work schedule (12 hour shifts). It's only the doctors that do the 24 hour shifts (which again, even then I disagree with it). The counter arguments have always centered around "handovers" and how they increase the risk of error. Too long of a discussion for here though.

 

With all seriousness most new parents in my line of work that I talk to all agree that their best nights of sleep are on call (when things aren't too busy, obviously). Unfortunately those nights will also probably be the hardest for my wife. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...