Jump to content
Neonred

Elizabeth Warren To Consider A 2020 Presidential Run After Midterms

35 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-to-consider-2020-run_us_5bb0e824e4b0343b3dc11858

 

Wow.   

 

A Trump Warren debate should be interesting and rather entertaining

Edited by Neonred

If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving is not for you.

Someone stole my dictionary. Now I am at a loss for words.

If Apple made a car, would it have windows?

Ban shredded cheese. Make America Grate Again .

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.  Deport him and you never have to feed him again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peanut gallery insults in 10,9,8...


Oct 19, 2010 I-130 application submitted to US Embassy Seoul, South Korea

Oct 22, 2010 I-130 application approved

Oct 22, 2010 packet 3 received via email

Nov 15, 2010 DS-230 part 1 faxed to US Embassy Seoul

Nov 15, 2010 Appointment for visa interview made on-line

Nov 16, 2010 Confirmation of appointment received via email

Dec 13, 2010 Interview date

Dec 15, 2010 CR-1 received via courier

Mar 29, 2011 POE Detroit Michigan

Feb 15, 2012 Change of address via telephone

Jan 10, 2013 I-751 packet mailed to Vermont Service CenterJan 15, 2013 NOA1

Jan 31, 2013 Biometrics appointment letter received

Feb 20, 2013 Biometric appointment date

June 14, 2013 RFE

June 24, 2013 Responded to RFE

July 24, 2013 Removal of conditions approved

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary is the most qualified.

 

But Elizabeth would be the first Native American President.


“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Democrats can say or do anything outrageous and get away wth it freely.

Republicans need not say or do anything outrageous and still be blamed for and guilty of it.

 

In regard to Warren, perhaps she should consider undergoing a personality transplant before running for anything else.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Democrats can say or do anything outrageous and get away wth it freely.

Republicans need not say or do anything outrageous and still be blamed for and guilty of it.

 

In regard to Warren, perhaps she should consider undergoing a personality transplant before running for anything else.

And some say the mainstream news media is not biased to the left.


Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Marty Byrde said:

We should elect a combat hardened Vietnam vet like Richard Blumenthal , I just discovered he lied about serving in Vietnam. How does a POC like that get elected to the senate.

Democrats are frauds. You got Blumenthal lying about his military service. You got Warren lying about being a native American. Then you have this Irish guy running against Ted Cruz who changed his first name from Robert to Beto to trick people into thinking he is Hispanic. It's disgusting.


morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

you have this Irish guy running against Ted Cruz who changed his first name from Robert to Beto to trick people into thinking he is Hispanic.

In fairness, as I'd posted in another CEHST thread, that was his nickname from when he was little.  He has never claimed to be anything other than "pretty Irish" (when he was asked about his heritage).  Regardless, he needs to be defeated on Election Day.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:

In fairness, as I'd posted in another CEHST thread, that was his nickname from when he was little.  He has never claimed to be anything other than "pretty Irish" (when he was asked about his heritage).  Regardless, he needs to be defeated on Election Day.

Who uses their nickname while running for political office?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Merle said:

Who uses their nickname while running for political office?

Rafael "Ted" Cruz 

Addison "Mitch" McConnell

Harold "Trey" Goudy

James "Jim" Jordan

Michael "Mike" Huckabee

Robert "Bob" Goodlatte

Louis "Louie" Gohmert

Edmund "Jerry" Brown

 

etc. These were just the ones that came to mind immediately. Some more obvious than others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

Rafael "Ted" Cruz 

Addison "Mitch" McConnell

Harold "Trey" Goudy

James "Jim" Jordan

Michael "Mike" Huckabee

Robert "Bob" Goodlatte

Louis "Louie" Gohmert

Edmund "Jerry" Brown

 

etc. These were just the ones that came to mind immediately. Some more obvious than others.

Louis, Robert, Michael, and Jim don't count.  Not does David/Dave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Louis, Robert, Michael, and Jim don't count.  Not does David/Dave.

Those are still nicknames, and are not the candidates' given names. It's not to say that Jim, Bob, etc. are not more easily determinable as the nicknames of those persons (like Tom is almost certainly a Thomas, or Bill almost always a William), a point which I made when I said some were more obvious than others. The question was, "Who uses their nickname while running for political office?" Since James Jordan's nickname is Jim, and that is the name he uses in his campaign materials, the answer to the question is "Jim Jordan, inter alia."

 

If the question had been, "Who uses a nickname while running for political office when that nickname is not a common nickname for the candidate's given name?" Jim Jordan would not be an appropriate answer, while Beto O'Rourke, Mitch McConnell and the others I listed above would still be correct answers. However, that was not the question, and I merely proposed answers to the question that was presented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×