Jump to content
The Nature  Boy

Take a look at the $12,495 Armani jacket Hillary wore while speaking about income inequality

 Share

154 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

QUOTE: "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

I don't see illegals anywhere in that statement.

Well the statement is basically true. To start with they are illegals, so they are criminals right off the bat.

He did not say all Mexicans and he did say he assumed some were good people

So you got anything real

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hillary has never been known for having the brightest fashion sense. However, there is a double standard here. Not much attention is ever put on how much the garments the men wear, is there? John Edward's hair-cut aside... some of the outfits male politicians wear could rival such as what Hillary wears. Oriz, how does it not cross her mind, you asked? Well, the thing is, unless you truly reign over all fashion decisions with an iron fist, people these days have handlers that make these choices for them, and I doubt they ever really ask how much they cost when you have money. No doubt the handler pulls some items and asks which Hillary would like to wear. She points to one ugly carpet and little thought is given to the cost. Not a good handler, no. But as I said, the public gives little thought to the cost of a man's ensemble. The same criticism was directed at Palin too with a $150,000 wardrobe as handlers attempt to brush up her image to the public.

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the statement is basically true. To start with they are illegals, so they are criminals right off the bat.

He did not say all Mexicans and he did say he assumed some were good people

So you got anything real

He didn't say anything about illegals. He said that about the whole country.

Some good people? I'd wager more than just some, but to make such a blanket statement is wrong.

What you're asking isn't if I have anything real, you're asking what has he said to offend you. In that regards, I have nothing since he only tends to offend women, black people, Muslims, and Hispanics...

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say anything about illegals. He said that about the whole country.

Some good people? I'd wager more than just some, but to make such a blanket statement is wrong.

What you're asking isn't if I have anything real, you're asking what has he said to offend you. In that regards, I have nothing since he only tends to offend women, black people, Muslims, and Hispanics...

He said the people they send here. He did not say all Mexicans

So Hillary is OK wearing a 12k suit while talking about income inequality because Trump said illegals commit a lot of crime and Palin spent money on clothes .

The muddy ditch left defections are always entertainment. It's like watching a ventriloquist dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of designers give their outfits for free to certain high profile people, or they lend them.

AOS for my husband
8/17/10: INTERVIEW DAY (day 123) APPROVED!!

ROC:
5/23/12: Sent out package
2/06/13: APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said the people they send here. He did not say all Mexicans

exactly, think about that wording "when mexico sends their people, they're not sending their best"

mexico sends us "illegals"..illegals being your assumption

so when mexico sends us illegals, they're sending us rapists and criminals, not their best.

why would mexico select criminals and rapists to send to us illegally?

Edited by elitesthuglib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://nypost.com/2016/06/05/hillarys-extravagant-campaign-wardrobe-costs-at-least-200k/

“She’s had to have spent in the six figures on this wardrobe overhaul,” says LA-based political image consultant Patsy Cisneros. Clinton, who loves to say that she left the White House in 2001 “dead broke,” is now dressing the part of someone who can command $325,000 for a single speech. Factoring in the designer labels she’s wearing, plus the number of new outfits she’s been photographed in over the past year, she’s likely spent at least $200,000 on new clothes to wear on the campaign trail.

And there’s a good chance that cash is coming out of her own pocket. For example, no designers are actively promoting that she’s wearing their labels — something that probably wouldn’t happen if she were getting her threads for free. Whether she’s given discounts is harder to say, although she has been spotted at stores like Bergdorf Goodman — so she is buying some items off the rack, a stark contrast to Michelle Obama, whose staff calls designers directly.

Done with K1, AOS and ROC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have a feeling income inequality and how much a jacket costs isn't really the point of the article, kids. your take home lesson is:

Hillary Clinton has had to modify much of her campaign message this primary season to accommodate Socialist Bernie Sanders and his rabid, class-warfare, “income inequality” rhetoric. But she hasn’t changed her rich taste in clothing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly, think about that wording "when mexico sends their people, they're not sending their best"

mexico sends us "illegals"..illegals being your assumption

so when mexico sends us illegals, they're sending us rapists and criminals, not their best.

why would mexico select criminals and rapists to send to us illegally?

Maybe the same reason Castro did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said the people they send here. He did not say all Mexicans

So Hillary is OK wearing a 12k suit while talking about income inequality because Trump said illegals commit a lot of crime and Palin spent money on clothes .

The muddy ditch left defections are always entertainment. It's like watching a ventriloquist dummy.

I know grammar and context aren't your forte, so I'll try and break it down for you.

When it comes to crimes that illegals commit vs crimes that citizens commit, I don't think that's an accurate statement

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/07/16/voices-gomez-undocumented-immigrant-crime-san-francisco-shooting/30159479/

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know grammar and context aren't your forte, so I'll try and break it down for you.

When it comes to crimes that illegals commit vs crimes that citizens commit, I don't think that's an accurate statement

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/07/16/voices-gomez-undocumented-immigrant-crime-san-francisco-shooting/30159479/

How dare you poke fun at my posting abilities. I am so reporting you and telling J nail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said the people they send here. He did not say all Mexicans

So Hillary is OK wearing a 12k suit while talking about income inequality because Trump said illegals commit a lot of crime and Palin spent money on clothes .

The muddy ditch left defections are always entertainment. It's like watching a ventriloquist dummy.

NB you're going off on a tangent again about ditches without focusing on the context of what was written. I did not say it was okay, OK? I'm saying that every politician that gets up on a stage is wearing an outfit that may cost on par with, equal to, or above the cost of the berber carpet she put on her body for that evening. The problem is we only seem to pay attention to it when it's the woman doing it.

Edited by yuna628

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NB you're going off on a tangent again about ditches without focusing on the context of what was written. I did not say it was okay, OK? I'm saying that every politician that gets up on a stage is wearing an outfit that may cost on par with, equal to, or above the cost of the berber carpet she put on her body for that evening. The problem is we only seem to pay attention to it when it's the woman doing it.

Not just women, but political ones are the biggest target. I think a lot of this hoopla is really because some people don't want to see a woman in the White House. Just like I blame President Obama for Trump making it this far...

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...