Federal Judge Requests All Clinton Email Records

[Dashinka 23,198]

Just wondering how the HRC team will respond to this one? Is Biden just sitting back waiting for her to implode then step in as a third Obama term?

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/all-clinton-records/

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the U.S. State Department to request that Hillary Clinton and her top aides confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession, return any other government records immediately, and describe their use of Hillary Clinton’s email server to conduct government business. The court issued the ruling late today after holding a status hearing in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information lawsuit that sought records about Huma Abedin, the former Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The lawsuit reopened last month because of revelations about Hillary Clinton’s email records.

The text of Judge Sullivan’s minute order, which was issued at 5:46 pm:

As agreed by the parties at the July 31, 2015 status hearing, the Government shall produce a copy of the letters sent by the State Department to Mrs. Hillary Clinton, Ms. Huma Abedin and Ms. Cheryl Mills regarding the collection of government records in their possession. These communications shall be posted on the docket forthwith. The Government has also agreed to share with Plaintiff’s counsel the responses sent by Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills. These communications shall also be posted on the docket forthwith. In addition, as related to Judicial Watch’s FOIA requests in this case, the Government is HEREBY ORDERED to: (1) identify any and all servers, accounts, hard drives, or other devices currently in the possession or control of the State Department or otherwise that may contain responsive information; (2) request that the above named individuals confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all responsive information that was or is in their possession as a result of their employment at the State Department. If all such information has not yet been produced, the Government shall request the above named individuals produce the information forthwith; and (3) request that the above named individuals describe, under penalty of perjury, the extent to which Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills used Mrs. Clinton’s email server to conduct official government business. The Government shall inform the Court of the status of its compliance with this Order no later than August 7, 2015, including any response received from Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on July 31, 2015.

“This blockbuster ruling is the most significant legal development to date in the ongoing Clinton email scandal. Hillary Clinton will now have to answer, under penalty of perjury, to a federal court about the separate email server she and her aides used to avoid accountability to the American people,” stated Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “This court action shows that the rule of law and public’s right to know will no longer take a back seat to politics. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration that is covering for her are not above the law.”

Judge Sullivan ruled on June 19 that the “changed circumstances” of the discovery that Hillary Clinton and members of her State Department staff used secret email accounts to conduct government business warranted “reopening” the lawsuit.

In asking Judge Sullivan to reopen the lawsuit, Judicial Watch cited a federal court rule (Rule 60(b)(3)) that allows a party to reopen a case due to “fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party:”

The State Department had an obligation under the Federal Records Act to properly preserve, maintain, and make available for retrieval records of its official functions. In fact, it is the obligation of the head of every federal agency to do so. Secretary Clinton plainly violated her own legal obligations. Doing so was misconduct.

The State Department originally agreed with Judicial Watch’s request but later changed its mind and asked the Court to reopen the lawsuit because of “newly discovered evidence.” Judge Sullivan simply reopened the case, rather than “spilling ink” on whether Hillary Clinton and the State Department committed fraud, misrepresentation or misconduct.

Huma Abedin left the State Department in February 2013, and in May 2013, Politico reported that, since June 2012, she had been double-dipping, working as a consultant to outside clients while continuing as a top adviser at State. Abedin’s outside clients included Teneo, a strategic consulting firm co-founded by former Bill Clinton counselor Doug Band. According to Fox News, Abedin earned $355,000 as a consultant to Teneo, in addition to her $135,000 SGE compensation.

Teneo describes its activities as providing “the leaders of the world’s most respected companies, nonprofit institutions and governments with a full suite of advisory solutions.” [Emphasis added] Outside of the U.S., it maintains offices in Dubai, London, Dublin, Hong Kong, Brussels, Washington, and Beijing. Teneo was also the subject of various investigative reports, including by the New York Times, which raise questions about its relationship with the Clinton Foundation.

In February 2014, the State Department assured Judicial Watch that it had searched the Office of the Executive Secretary, which would have included the offices of the Secretary of State and top staff. Relying upon the State Department’s misrepresentation that the agency conducted a reasonable search, Judicial Watch agreed to dismiss its lawsuit on March 14, 2014.

This is the second Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit that had been reopened because of the revelations Hillary Clinton’s email system. Judicial Watch is aware of no prior instances of federal courts reopening Freedom of Information lawsuits. Judicial Watch is litigating nearly 20 separate federal lawsuits concerning Hillary Clinton’s email records.

Read more about Clinton Email, Hillary Clinton

[lostinblue 1,989]

[Darnell 8,478]

wait wait - is Huma Abedin a Radical Islamist ?

and yes, I do think that Teneo is a money pipeline into the Clinton Foundation and the Elect Hilary Campaign fund.

Edited August 4, 2015 by Darnell

[TENBILLIONDOLLARS 216]

Hillary will do whatever the heck She wants. She thinks she's Inevitable. She's surrounded by a gaggle of estrogen that reinforces Her belief in Her own Inevitability. It's quite the spectacle. She will crash and burn, of course. The question is how will her arrogance kill her this time?

Stay tuned.

[Darnell 8,478]

I think 3 of her Lesbian Lovers will start a 'tell-all' about the 3rd week of August.

#LifeChoices !

[Póg mo 1,749]

Hillary will do whatever the heck She wants. She thinks she's Inevitable. She's surrounded by a gaggle of estrogen that reinforces Her belief in Her own Inevitability. It's quite the spectacle. She will crash and burn, of course. The question is how will her arrogance kill her this time?

Stay tuned.

Yeah,the right wing echo chamber has been saying that a lot lately.

[Operator 1,925]

[lostinblue 1,989]

http://www.itsi-inc.com/opsec/S1class/Marking.htm

Marking Classified Information

Physically marking classified information with appropriate classification and control markings serves to warn and inform holders of the degree of protection required. Other notations aid in derivative classification actions and facilitate downgrading or declassification. It is important that all classified information and material be marked to clearly convey the level of classification assigned, the portions that contain or reveal classified information, the period of time protection is required, and any other notations required for protection of the information or material.

The following is a summary of the most commonly used document control markings. More detailed information is available via the Internet from a variety of sources.1

Killary must of missed this memo

I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email,”

There is no classified material,” she said then, “so I’m certainly well-aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”

I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.

It is not clear if any of the information in the emails was marked as classified by the State Department when Mrs. Clinton sent or received them.

In the course of the email review, State Department officials determined that some information in the messages should be retroactively classified. In the 3,000 pages that were released, for example, portions of two dozen emails were redacted because they were upgraded to “classified status.” But none of those were marked as classified at the time Mrs. Clinton handled them.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/25/politics/clinton-confident-never-sent-classified-emails/

[Jacque67 7,328]

I think 3 of her Lesbian Lovers will start a 'tell-all' about the 3rd week of August.

#LifeChoices !

You wanna take a bet on that?

[Ban Hammer 12,829]

[Darnell 8,478]

You wanna take a bet on that?

Sure ! 11 kilograms of instant poutine gravy powder mix, must be bought in Montreal by a person seeking an immigrant visa there, done on interview day, after the interview, loser sends monies to said human, all shipped to the winner's address.

You on?

[Jacque67 7,328]

Sure ! 11 kilograms of instant poutine gravy powder mix, must be bought in Montreal by a person seeking an immigrant visa there, done on interview day, after the interview, loser sends monies to said human, all shipped to the winner's address.

You on?

So you aren't prepared to make a simple bet?

And in another story , I wish I could get the monkey off my back;)

[Darnell 8,478]

So you aren't prepared to make a simple bet?

And in another story , I wish I could get the monkey off my back;)

huh? this is a simple bet ! if'n i win, that's what the loser handles.

what are yer terms if'n you win?

[Jacque67 7,328]

huh? this is a simple bet ! if'n i win, that's what the loser handles.

what are yer terms if'n you win?

I don't know any Canadians wanting visas for the US. so can't fulfil that part.

When I win.... I don't need anything. The taste of victory is enough;)

[Darnell 8,478]

I don't know any Canadians wanting visas for the US. so can't fulfil that part.

When I win.... I don't need anything. The taste of victory is enough;)

i don't know any either - but i can find them, bribe them, and get it done. if'n i can do that, so can you [since we're on a immigrate to usa web portal and canada is the #3 head-count membership here, and all interviews are in montreal]

come on. it'll be fun ! name yer terms if'n you win.

and note this is a timed bet, expires the end of the 3rd week in august.