Jump to content
lostinblue

Concealed carry owner shows restraint

 Share

46 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Permit holders are more responsible than the majority of folks out in public . This man showed a great deal of restraint did he not ?

A conclusion about society at large based on a single, arbitrary example proves very little. Not saying the opinion is correct or incorrect, just that your reasoning is massively flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

+100! :thumbs: :thumbs:

That would be the understatement of the week.

A conclusion about society at large based on a single, arbitrary example proves very little. Not saying the opinion is correct or incorrect, just that your reasoning is massively flawed.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

People with concealed carry permits are:

  • 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public
  • 13.5 times less likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses than the general public

An Analysis of the Arrest Rate of Texas Concealed Carry Handgun License Holders as Compared to the Arrest Rate of the Entire Texas Population, William E. Sturdevant, PE, September 11, 1999

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

People with concealed carry permits are:

  • 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public
  • 13.5 times less likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses than the general public

An Analysis of the Arrest Rate of Texas Concealed Carry Handgun License Holders as Compared to the Arrest Rate of the Entire Texas Population, William E. Sturdevant, PE, September 11, 1999

You mean that when you take a subset of the population that has met certain requirements in terms of their lawful behavior you would find that that subset is less likely to get into trouble with the law than the population as a whole? Really? I would have never guessed.

[/sarcasm]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

You mean that when you take a subset of the population that has met certain requirements in terms of their lawful behavior you would find that that subset is less likely to get into trouble with the law than the population as a whole? Really? I would have never guessed.

[/sarcasm]

No sarcasm needed. What you said is true. If you filter out people with criminal tendencies or pasts you get people that are less likely to be criminals.

Its what the FBI, CIA, Police do. I'm guessing most people given the news of late WON'T be surprised to find that CCW holders generally have more favorable safety statistics than the police as well.

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

No sarcasm needed. What you said is true. If you filter out people with criminal tendencies or pasts you get people that are less likely to be criminals.

Its what the FBI, CIA, Police do. I'm guessing most people given the news of late WON'T be surprised to find that CCW holders generally have more favorable safety statistics than the police as well.

Not really. You'd once again be comparing apples and oranges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

No sarcasm needed. What you said is true. If you filter out people with criminal tendencies or pasts you get people that are less likely to be criminals.

Its what the FBI, CIA, Police do. I'm guessing most people given the news of late WON'T be surprised to find that CCW holders generally have more favorable safety statistics than the police as well.

Let's not give credence to the OP's dubious rationale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

No sarcasm needed. What you said is true. If you filter out people with criminal tendencies or pasts you get people that are less likely to be criminals.

Its what the FBI, CIA, Police do. I'm guessing most people given the news of late WON'T be surprised to find that CCW holders generally have more favorable safety statistics than the police as well.

Pretty sure that is racist.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Apparently. Shooting a father in front of his child over a minor argument apparently counts as restraint, too. Or shooting a guy in a movie theater for texting. Or a kid at a gas station for loud music. All fatal shootings carried out by concealed carry permit holders. You know, those people with a lot of restraint. Gun nuts show restraint. What a laughable claim...

All fatal shootings by CHP holders? What a load of bollocks. You have pulled that figure out of your bum.

Yes, there are some real idiots with guns, but the decent owners who've gone to get the necessary training and are responsible make up the vast majority. How many people stab, beat, drive over people to death each year? Nah we're not bothered by that.

How about the majority of killings carried out with stolen guns by gang members who can't lawfully possess them? Yeah, let's ignore those.

Please don't generalise and make sweeping statement as you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't like guns, fine but don't restrict my ability to have one. Also, someone who doesn't like guns is REALLY not going to like them if they get shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fatal shootings by CHP holders? What a load of bollocks. You have pulled that figure out of your bum.

Yes, there are some real idiots with guns, but the decent owners who've gone to get the necessary training and are responsible make up the vast majority. How many people stab, beat, drive over people to death each year? Nah we're not bothered by that.

How about the majority of killings carried out with stolen guns by gang members who can't lawfully possess them? Yeah, let's ignore those.

Please don't generalise and make sweeping statement as you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't like guns, fine but don't restrict my ability to have one. Also, someone who doesn't like guns is REALLY not going to like them if they get shot.

It's funny how this mindset is only reserved for gun owners.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fatal shootings by CHP holders? What a load of bollocks. You have pulled that figure out of your bum.

Yes, there are some real idiots with guns, but the decent owners who've gone to get the necessary training and are responsible make up the vast majority. How many people stab, beat, drive over people to death each year? Nah we're not bothered by that.

How about the majority of killings carried out with stolen guns by gang members who can't lawfully possess them? Yeah, let's ignore those.

Please don't generalise and make sweeping statement as you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't like guns, fine but don't restrict my ability to have one. Also, someone who doesn't like guns is REALLY not going to like them if they get shot.

It wasn't a figure, he was naming actual incidents that took place with people who had concealed carry permits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...