Why isn't Al Sharpton in jail for tax evasion?

[unsmiley 111]

Nice dodge. When you're backed into a corner, always deflect.

You said everyone needs to pay taxes with no exceptions no matter how much income they have. I've asked you numerous times to explain how it would be advantageous to take tax money from people on low incomes, paying no taxes and collecting some form of gov't subsidy. You have yet to answer but I''ll wait maybe this time you'll dig deep and come up with sumthin.

I don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you.

Can't you read? I said if they HAVE income. No income = no taxes. Maybe in the future I will try to use smaller words. You are the one attempting to redirect the thread to "gov't subsidies", something I have not tackled here.

And "backed into a corner"? Hardly. That IS funny !!.

[unsmiley 111]

Because poor people really aren't people at all.

I cannot believe you could make such a statement. No poster (other than you) has even implied this here. I am surprised no one called you out on this.

[GandD 5,966]

A couple personal attacks removed. Remember, the argument is about the issues, not each other.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

But oddly enough mankind survived millions of years without it . I went to school 12 years with no AC.

AC is a luxury make no mistake about it

If you find a free TV then I am all for them having it . If they have enough money to have a large screen TV they purchased they don't need our help. Easy logic simple stuff really.

Can't work... Yes by all means

Won't work.. Let them starve. When the hunger pains hit, they will go to work.. trust me

Have you actually considered how the government arrives at the determination of can't work vs. won't work?

It is not as clear cut as you might imagine.

[TBoneTX 43,057]

A post has been removed for encroaching on this (new) item in the VJ Terms of Service:

"Attempt to bypass the Forums language filter through the use of alternative characters to spell profanities or through the posting of images containing profanity."

[Teddy B 17,251]

Can't you read? I said if they HAVE income. No income = no taxes. Maybe in the future I will try to use smaller words. You are the one attempting to redirect the thread to "gov't subsidies", something I have not tackled here.

And "backed into a corner"? Hardly. That IS funny !!.

I cannot believe you could make such a statement. No poster (other than you) has even implied this here. I am surprised no one called you out on this.

More proof that children should have supervised computer time.