Armed Hate Crime Victim Decides Not to Shoot Attacker

[Ban Hammer 12,835]

Duplicate thread. Reported to mods.

http://www.visajourn...etimes-is-good/

merged

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Yep.

Having a gun is pretty pointless if a man lacks the balls to at least draw it when somebody shoots at him.

It was his decision to make. He made the one he felt was right.

It also states he was at risk of shooting an innocent bystander if he took the shot.

Amazing how someone posted an article about an armed man NOT shooting at the shooter in the mall in Oregon and everyone said he was a hero and that he was being responsible by not taking a dangerous shot.

This man makes the same decision and people question him and accuse him of not having the balls to use a gun.

Let's ignore the crazy person who is willing to attack someone because he thinks he's Muslim and because he's with a white girl. Forget about HIM, let's focus our negativity on the guy who didn't shoot him. You guys are brilliant.

Edited January 7, 2013 by Evylin

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

It was his decision to make. He made the one he felt was right.

It also states he was at risk of shooting an innocent bystander if he took the shot.

Amazing how someone posted an article about an armed man NOT shooting at the shooter in the mall in Oregon and everyone said he was a hero and that he was being responsible by not taking a dangerous shot.

This man makes the same decision and people question him and accuse him of not having the balls to use a gun.

Stop it, your logic is making too much sense. Can't...breathe...

[spookyturtle 9,465]

It was his decision to make. He made the one he felt was right.

It also states he was at risk of shooting an innocent bystander if he took the shot.

Amazing how someone posted an article about an armed man NOT shooting at the shooter in the mall in Oregon and everyone said he was a hero and that he was being responsible by not taking a dangerous shot.

This man makes the same decision and people question him and accuse him of not having the balls to use a gun.

Gotta love e-balls.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Stop it, your logic is making too much sense. Can't...breathe...

I can't believe what some people are taking from this story. I thought I'd seen it all here.

Then again, this is the crowd that tried to convince me that real hate crimes don't even happen anymore.

Edited January 7, 2013 by Evylin

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Good read. Thanks for posting it!

That was a risk he was apparently willing to take, and doesn't appear to regret it.

Each their own, but if someone pulls a weapon and starts shooting at My wife and I, he is dead. Not shooting that guy wass weakness. The gun could have been reakand he and hsi GFcould be dead. It could jsut have easily went the other way. Also a pellet could have conceivably caused a serious injury.

lots of restraint on his part .... especially when someone is shooting multiple times at close range with a pellet gun with the intent to inflict harm/ blind. heck i'm sure his life would be the same with the loss of one or both eyes so long as daniel is still breathing.

i wonder if cameron is mentally prepared to use his carry piece?

Ones may restraint is another mans failure to act

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Each their own, but if someone pulls a weapon and starts shooting at My wife and I, he is dead. Not shooting that guy wass weakness. The gun could have been reakand he and hsi GFcould be dead. It could jsut have easily went the other way. Also a pellet could have conceivably caused a serious injury.

And he could have shot at his attacker and hit the innocent bystander and killed them. He made his own decisions, and everyone got out alive. You hail some people for NOT shooting in a public area, and then attack this guy for not doing it. How hypocritical.

This man was the victim. He did nothing wrong. It's unbelievable to me that out of this story, the pro-gun crowd is actually focusing on the victim and not the attacker and judging HIS actions.

Edited January 7, 2013 by Evylin

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Yep.

Having a gun is pretty pointless if a man lacks the balls to at least draw it when somebody shoots at him.

Agree 100%. How did he know it was a pellet gun, when the man first drew it.If you point a weapon at me, you better kill me.

It was his decision to make. He made the one he felt was right.

It also states he was at risk of shooting an innocent bystander if he took the shot.

Amazing how someone posted an article about an armed man NOT shooting at the shooter in the mall in Oregon and everyone said he was a hero and that he was being responsible by not taking a dangerous shot.

This man makes the same decision and people question him and accuse him of not having the balls to use a gun.

Let's ignore the crazy person who is willing to attack someone because he thinks he's Muslim and because he's with a white girl. Forget about HIM, let's focus our negativity on the guy who didn't shoot him. You guys are brilliant.

Not letting him off the hook at all. he should have died. Now I hope the lock him up for a long time. Kudos to the guy, if he thinks he did the right thing bless him. I am just saying he could have very easily died.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Not letting him off the hook at all. he should have died. Now I hope the lock him up for a long time. Kudos to the guy, if he thinks he did the right thing bless him. I am just saying he could have very easily died.

He could have. And so could some other innocent victim. If it's not a decision you personally would make, great. But to attack this guy and say he has no balls for not taking the shot, that's ridiculous.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I can't believe what some people are taking from this story. I thought I'd seen it all here.

Then again, this is the crowd that tried to convince me that real hate crimes don't even happen anymore.

All we said is if you murder someone, because he is a minority, why is it more of a crime than if you murder him because you because he cuts you off in traffic.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

All we said is if you murder someone, because he is a minority, why is it more of a crime than if you murder him because you because he cuts you off in traffic.

What are you talking about? That's not the discussion I'm referencing at all.

I don't know if you've noticed, but whenever anything is in the news about a hate crime that turns out to be fake, it gets posted here. And it gets the same comments every time. That true, genuine hate crimes don't happen anymore. Well, they clearly do. That's what I'm talking about.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

What are you talking about? That's not the discussion I'm referencing at all.

I don't know if you've noticed, but whenever anything is in the news about a hate crime that turns out to be fake, it gets posted here. And it gets the same comments every time. That true, genuine hate crimes don't happen anymore. Well, they clearly do. That's what I'm talking about.

So if I blow my white neighbors brains out , it is less of a crime than if I blow my black neighbors brains out. Pure Liberal Genius..

[Penny Lane 8,159]

So if I blow my white neighbors brains out , it is less of a crime than if I blow my black neighbors brains out. Pure Liberal Genius..

Okay, you're gonna have to say this reaaaal sloooow for me. Where did I say anything remotely like that?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Okay, you're gonna have to say this reaaaal sloooow for me. Where did I say anything remotely like that?

So you don't support hate crime laws.. My bad

[Penny Lane 8,159]

So you don't support hate crime laws.. My bad

So you're just making sh*t up and pretending I said it and responding to it ... weird.