Jump to content

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
Vatican Crackdown: American Nuns Reject Takeover But Seek Dialogue On Difference

ST. LOUIS (RNS) American nuns facing a Vatican takeover of their leadership organization on Friday (Aug. 10) rejected Rome's plans to recast the group in a more conservative mold, but declined -- for now -- to respond with an ultimatum that could have created an unprecedented schism between the sisters and the hierarchy.

The Vatican announced in April that it was assigning a team of bishops to take control of the LCWR in order to make the organization -- and by extension, most U.S. nuns -- hew more closely and publicly to orthodox teachings on sexuality and theology.

Sister Pat Farrell, the outgoing president of the LCWR, on Friday read the official response that expressed the organization's "deep disappointment" with Rome's verdict. But the statement also said the nuns wanted to keep talking with the hierarchy in hopes of "creating more possibilities for the laity and, particularly for women, to have a voice in the church."

Farrell added, however, that the sisters will reconsider their options if the LCWR "is forced to compromise the integrity of its mission." That indicated that if the Vatican does not relent on at least some of its plans to revamp the organization, the sisters could make good on the threat to disband the LCWR and reorganize it as an independent body beyond the reach of the Vatican.

Stating the obvious, she said the Vatican's mandate over the LCWR "suggests that we are not currently living in an ideal ecclesial world."

The next crucial step in the process will come on Saturday, when the LCWR board is set to meet for two hours with Seattle Archbishop J. Peter Sartain, the head of a three-bishop team appointed by Rome to oversee the overhaul of the LCWR over the next five years.

That will mark the first official meeting between Sartain and the nuns since the Vatican takeover was announced. Several LCWR leaders said they hope to establish a relationship -- if not yet a rapport -- that would reduce frictions and lead to a lower-key and perhaps more fruitful dialogue, for the nuns at least.

Sartain is viewed as an approachable bishop who could help steer both sides toward a mutually acceptable resolution.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/11/american-nuns-reject-vatican_n_1766852.html

This is not a pope given to compromise, if anyone has read any of Cardinal Ratzinger's (now Pope Benedict XVI) dialogues.

Edited by The Patriot
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

I pray the nuns leave the Church.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Another controversy with the church - no wonder people are turned off from religion.

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Sure it's just another example of how Liberals cause nothing but trouble and division wherever they nest but beyond that.....

Consider all the extremes of opinion and even opposition the Catholic Church endures from within.

If only the NY Times or NPR allowed the same level of in-house variety of opinion.

The Church has been codling long enough, give these Phony Brides Of Christ the boot.

Anyone have a copy of the vows these women took?

Be nice to see what it is exactly they signed on for.

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Sure it's just another example of how Liberals cause nothing but trouble and division wherever they nest but beyond that.....

Consider all the extremes of opinion and even opposition the Catholic Church endures from within.

If only the NY Times or NPR allowed the same level of in-house variety of opinion.

The Church has been codling long enough, give these Phony Brides Of Christ the boot.

Anyone have a copy of the vows these women took?

Be nice to see what it is exactly they signed on for.

Most peopel nowadays don't honor vows/contracts anymore. That is the new normal.

Edited by kennard

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Filed: Timeline
Posted

There's one thing I agree with the church on: you want to be in the club, you play by the rules. Unfortunately the rules are made by men, and women are treated as second-class citizens. But that's what you signed on for, so either toe the line or get out.

Personally, I hope they get out. Seems like these women do a lot of good. Time to ditch that anachronistic old fossil of an organization so they can keep doing good.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

There's one thing I agree with the church on: you want to be in the club, you play by the rules. Unfortunately the rules are made by men, and women are treated as second-class citizens. But that's what you signed on for, so either toe the line or get out.

Personally, I hope they get out. Seems like these women do a lot of good. Time to ditch that anachronistic old fossil of an organization so they can keep doing good.

An apt description :lol:

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...