New Hampshire Bill Would Allow Refusal Of Service To Gay Couples

[mr and mrs 187]

I thought that was a Phil Phillips song.

chan marshall does a gorgeous cover. pretty enough to marry a house to.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

So should hotel and resteraunt owners serve someone married to a farm animal if that's allowed? I mean where does it end?

Is that the best you got? The "slippery slope" garbage? Thanks for confirming that you have no actual point to make in support of this blatant discrimination.

[mr and mrs 187]

did he honestly just post the words 'rape-proof'?

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

If you don't read books you own you're a fool and a f^cktard. I think we can agree on that if nothing else.

Seriously who has the time to read a book these days when there's ESPN, HBO, internet and sex with the whoever.

you are incapable of articulating your beliefs about gays without violating TOS. your hatred seethes out everytime you post. it is UNBELIEVABLE that so many of your vicious comments are allowed to stand.

now, where was i?

ah yes.

source

It's not a violation of TOS for telling facts...well sometimes it is...it all depends on what mod and what mood said mod is in at the time. I haven't violated TOS on this thread.... even though people like you don't like my opinions. Libs hate opinions that vary from theirs.

Edited January 31, 2012 by Why_Me

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

did he honestly just post the words 'rape-proof'?

"Rape proof" is a term we used in the army for those military issue prescription eye glasses they would give you for wearing out in the field. Somehow they have become trendy and fashionable for libs these days who think being "anti fashionable and sexy" is the "in thing" nowadays. Throw in a turtle neck, and some loose baggy fitting slacks and you have your typical lib fashion. For some reason libs don't like to look sexy.

Edited January 31, 2012 by Why_Me

[elmcitymaven 9,711]

Psst: no one fashionable wears baggy trousers. And whilst a black turtleneck is a classic (though a fashion faux pas for the more ample-busted) it is passé amongst the hipsters as fashion-forward. Methinks your "liberal fashion plate" caricature is strictly 1994.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Psst: no one fashionable wears baggy trousers. And whilst a black turtleneck is a classic (though a fashion faux pas for the more ample-busted) it is passé amongst the hipsters as fashion-forward. Methinks your "liberal fashion plate" caricature is strictly 1994.

Look at that lib show "Friends" and then look at one of the lib shows on the tube these days...or even the chicks in Seattle. It's that same mousy looking hair do's, and the same pants...same everything. The hair thing is the worse of it imo. Even the news chicks up here have those hair styles and it's like "####### did the dog just drag in".

The chicks on FOX news don't follow that fashion look thank god. I mean they dress to kill on that show. It's the only reason I ever watch that channel. Short skirts, high heels, and those black nylons with a bit of cleavage showing. Love those news chicks.

[웃 910]

Maryland Marriage Equality: 14-Year-Old Girl Pleads With Senate Officials To Vote Against Gay Marriage On Her Birthday

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Tsr7rz9Og

[elmcitymaven 9,711]

Look at that lib show "Friends" and then look at one of the lib shows on the tube these days...or even the chicks in Seattle. It's that same mousy looking hair do's, and the same pants...same everything. The hair thing is the worse of it imo. Even the news chicks up here have those hair styles and it's like "####### did the dog just drag in".

The chicks on FOX news don't follow that fashion look thank god. I mean they dress to kill on that show. It's the only reason I ever watch that channel. Short skirts, high heels, and those black nylons with a bit of cleavage showing. Love those news chicks.

We apparently get our television programming from different planets. I would have thought Rachel Bilson on "Hart of Dixie" would have been right up your street.

Also, I do not get the Hooker Network, alas.

[Brad and Vika 129]

Several posts containing TOS violating language have been removed, along with posts quoting.

Post Content intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a broad demographic or group of people identified by a unifying trait or characteristic (discrimination). For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech.

Further degrading comments will require administrative action.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

We apparently get our television programming from different planets. I would have thought Rachel Bilson on "Hart of Dixie" would have been right up your street.

Also, I do not get the Hooker Network, alas.

Never heard of her or that showuntil you just posted about her so I did a google on that gal and ya that works.

Edited February 1, 2012 by Why_Me