Big telecom firms make millions from cramming fees, senator says

[Ban Hammer 12,835]

Mysterious fees and services crammed onto phone bills are a “nationwide epidemic” for U.S. consumers, but a reliable source of revenue for some of America's biggest telecommunications companies, a year-long congressional investigation has found.

A report issued Wednesday by Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., says that three firms -- Verizon, AT&T and CenturyLink/Quest -- earned $650 million as their cut of cramming charges levied by third-parties since 2006.

Cramming charges -- such as unwanted $10-per-month voicemail or Web design services -- have been frustrating phone customers for more than 15 years, thanks in part to ill-considered rules designed to enhance competition in local phone markets. Consumers often don't spot the small monthly fees, but even when they do getting refunds can be a nightmare: The telephone provider that sends the bills often refuses to issue refunds, instead referring consumers to the third-party firms, which are often unresponsive. The Federal Communications Commission estimates that 15 million to 20 million consumers are crammed every year. Rockefeller’s report says cramming could cost U.S. consumers $2 billion annually.

Congress has been unable to fix the problem for more than a decade.

"I think it's embarrassing for the Congress ... but they're big companies. They don't have to make money that way," Rockefeller told NBC News in advance of a hearing on cramming Wednesday. "I think it's reprehensible and … shameful behavior. And don't tell me they don't know about it. They have to know about it."

Crammers are so bold that they have jammed unauthorized charges onto dead people's phone bills, government agencies' telephone lines -- even onto lines owned by AT&T.

"Committee staff has found hundreds of egregious examples of cramming," the report said. "Third-party vendors have enrolled deceased persons in their so-called services and charged family members' telephone bills for it. They have charged telephone lines dedicated to fire alarms, security systems, bank vaults, elevators and 911 systems. Senior citizens' telephones have been enrolled in web-hosting services, even though they have never used. A children‘s hospital was charged for a celebrity tracker e-mail service that provided daily celebrity news feeds, photos, and videos. A national bank‘s telephone lines were charged for credit protection plans."

Perhaps nothing illustrates how out of control cramming has become as well as AT&T's own victimization.

"Committee staff confirmed that third-party vendors associated with one hub company crammed at least 80 of AT&T‘s own telephone lines with charges for services such as voicemail, sometimes for periods as long as 18 months," the report said.

During the hearing by the Senate Commerce Committee, Rockefeller called on Congress to take action against what he called "a scam that has cost telephone customers billions of dollars."

"It’s time for us to take a new look at this problem and find a way to solve it once and for all," he said. "We’ve let the crammers get away with these abuses for far too long. There’s also a cost of cramming that is harder to put a dollar figure on – the countless frustrating hours that families and businesses spend trying to get these charges taken off their phone bills."

Cramming complaints have piled into state consumer offices, the Federal Trade Commission and the FCC since at least 1995, but neither Congress nor the phone companies that collect the money have been able to slow the problem or find the companies behind it.

NBC's Lisa Myers did, however. In an investigative report that aired Wednesday on TODAY, Myers located one company that acts as a clearinghouse for cramming; tracked down dozens of other firms that hide behind the same P.O. boxes; and found that hundreds of firms that have "D" of "F" ratings with the Better Business Bureau. Myers also had no trouble finding consumers hit with outlandish cramming charges on their phone bills: $14.95 for ID theft monitoring; $16 a month for a fax service; $40 a month for voicemail.

"Why are they in business? Probably because they're scamming and cramming and making money off of innocent people," Rockefeller said. "I'm shocked. I'm angry. I'm frustrated that nobody's been able to stop it."

The heat is getting turned up on cramming recently, however. On Tuesday, the FCC proposed new rules that would require more obvious disclosures by third parties on phone bills.

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan wants to go much farther, however, and is calling for an outright ban on third-party billing on phone bills.

"Simply put, these deceptive and sometimes fraudulent solicitations for products that no one wants or agreed to buy have persisted for at least 15 years and show no signs of disappearing," she said. “It is time to put an end to third-party billing on telephone bills by banning them.”

Under current rules, providers are forced to give third-party firms the chance to market services like toll-free numbers or website hosting using the providers' equipment and billing services through an arrangement that has its origins in the original breakup of AT&T’s telephone monopoly. But it's too easy for third parties to attach unwanted items to consumers' bills -- previous investigations have found firms frequently trick consumers into signing up using sweepstakes entries or cashing small checks that also serve as authorization forms. In other cases, the third-party firms simply lie about getting authorization, a scam called “phantom billing.”

While crammers collect billions of dollars, telecom firms get a percentage of each payment for passing along the charge. Rockefeller said that added up to $650 million for the three big firms in the last five years. Rockefeller’s report says Verizon, for example, collects $1 to $2 per charge.

“It's something the phone companies do know. And they can't not know it -- because -- it's bringing in a lot of money to them,” he said. And it’s bringing them a lot of complaints. The report says more than 500,000 customers have contacted AT&T, CenturyLink/Qwest, and Verizon to complain about cramming in the past five years.

The report also claims that phone companies put pressure on employees to grant shady third-parties access to consumers' accounts for billing purposes.

"Documents reviewed by the committee staff show that some telephone company employees feel financial pressure to approve third-party vendors even though the companies appear to be crammers," it says.

Both Verizon and CenturyLink told NBC News that they do not tolerate cramming, and that they carefully scrutinize outside companies and respond to complaints. Both declined on-camera interviews. AT&T had no comment.

Walter McCormick, CEO of U.S. Telecom Association, said at Wednesday's hearing that telephone firms have made strides while clamping down on bogus third-party charges, and said many consumers find third-party billing to be covenient. But he acknowledged that unauthorized charges are a "continuing problem."

"We pledge our industry's good faith and our committment to work with you," on solutions, he said.

Madigan said the first complaints about cramming showed up in her office in 1996. At the time, products such as prepaid calling cards, voice mail service, credit repair services, cell phone warranties, local singles matching services, Web page design, and toll-free numbers were most frequently crammed, she said. More recently, the scams have evolved to include credit repair, identity theft prevention and monitoring, business advice, online photo storage, roadside assistance, online yellow pages listings, and many other services.

They have a common denominator: Consumers pay for them, sometimes for years, but don't want them or use them.

"These low usage rates, less than 1 percent, indicate that consumers did not knowingly sign up for them," she said. "In one case I brought, the vendor had billed over 9,800 Illinois consumers for credit repair services. Although the credit repair services were designed for individuals, the billed consumers include a county coroner’s office, a Steak N Shake restaurant and a public library dial-a-story telephone line."

Many consumers don't understand that their telephone number can be used "just like a credit card," she said.

The deception has evolved since the arrival of the “Do Not Call” list in 2003, she said, with more consumers tricked into third-party telephone services via online Web pages.

link

[mawilson 2,133]

It's true... Verizon added a bunch of ####### to my account (including "premium technical support" for my internet connection and some online game service) after I specifically asked them not to.

I was so pissed off, I closed my account and switched to Time Warner.

[slim 1,514]

What I don't understand is why it's government's place to say what companies can and can't charge.

[mawilson 2,133]

What I don't understand is why it's government's place to say what companies can and can't charge.

Because it's borderline fraud.

[^_^ 5,021]

Because it's borderline fraud.

The Constitution gives you the means to deal with fraud in the 2nd Amendment. Why is there a need for yet another government agency and yet another government power?

[mawilson 2,133]

The Constitution gives you the means to deal with fraud in the 2nd Amendment.

It doesn't.

[^_^ 5,021]

It doesn't.

Be creative.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

It really is criminal what happens with the third-party vendors.

I've been dealing with AT&T the past couple of years and forcing them to take care of the charges.

We actually had one of the 3rd-party vendors one time tell us they had a "recording" of us signing up for the service and it was the voice of a woman with a strong middle-eastern accent claiming to be our VP lol... The VP is a guy for one, and no where near sounding what the lady sounded ilke. Needless to say, I threatened to sue their ####### if they didn't remove the charges and if we ever saw a charge from them again.

One BIG KEY and main thing is make sure whenever a random number/telemarketer asks you to 'verify' who you are or what your company does, NEVER, EVER use the words "yes, yeah, that's correct" etc... They will manipulate the phone coversation to sign you up for a service and then bill your AT&T, Verizon, etc. bill. Just hang up or if you must say something just say "nothing has changed" in regards to your information and then hang up. Do not give them the time of day or the chance to try and get money out of you.

As the article says... getting charges removed can be a real pain in the #######.

[Ban Hammer 12,835]

As the article says... getting charges removed can be a real pain in the #######.

quite true. i posted this because at&t added long distance to my plan without my knowledge or consent - and then charged me for it.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

quite true. i posted this because at&t added long distance to my plan without my knowledge or consent - and then charged me for it.

was it actually AT&T or was it one of the third-party long distance vendors?

The key to prevent those charges from the third-party vendors is demand AT&T block outside charges from being allowed. They will try and fight it by saying, "oh but you won't be able to sign up for any outside items, etc.." BUT that's the point, you don't want the outside charges.

They can do it. You just have to demand it.

[Zero Sum 305]

I guess speaking pleasantly to Customer Service people has its benefits. The one time I got crammed I promptly called and got them to remove it; no problems. In the meantime there's something called, DO NOT CALL LIST that has eliminated virtually 99.9% of what was the historical pattern of marketer/sales calls. The very, very, very few that come through I only tell them in a very pleasant voice that they are NOT authorized to call me, remove my number from their list, and I have logged their incoming number for any repeat offenses to be sent to the FCC. And I do so in a nice voice. I have not received an unsolicited call in more than two years.

[slim 1,514]

Because it's borderline fraud.

If a company charges you for something why do you need the government to dispute it for you?

It's sickening that we're so incapable of handling our own problems that we now call upon the government for more regulations in every aspect of our lives. Don't like what the bank charges you? Call Uncle Sam. Don't like the fees the credit card companies charge? Enact legislation to set a maximum rate. Don't like the way the phone company does business? Ban it!

Why can't we do this without government's interference?

[Zero Sum 305]

If a company charges you for something why do you need the government to dispute it for you?

It's sickening that we're so incapable of handling our own problems that we now call upon the government for more regulations in every aspect of our lives. Don't like what the bank charges you? Call Uncle Sam. Don't like the fees the credit card companies charge? Enact legislation to set a maximum rate. Don't like the way the phone company does business? Ban it!

Why can't we do this without government's interference?

You can opt out.

[mawilson 2,133]

If a company charges you for something why do you need the government to dispute it for you?

It's sickening that we're so incapable of handling our own problems that we now call upon the government for more regulations in every aspect of our lives. Don't like what the bank charges you? Call Uncle Sam. Don't like the fees the credit card companies charge? Enact legislation to set a maximum rate. Don't like the way the phone company does business? Ban it!

Why can't we do this without government's interference?

Because you wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on otherwise.

To "dispute" something, there has to be a law against it. That's where the government comes in.

[Ban Hammer 12,835]

was it actually AT&T or was it one of the third-party long distance vendors?

The key to prevent those charges from the third-party vendors is demand AT&T block outside charges from being allowed. They will try and fight it by saying, "oh but you won't be able to sign up for any outside items, etc.." BUT that's the point, you don't want the outside charges.

They can do it. You just have to demand it.

it was at&t.