Hmmm.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

EOM

[Kathryn41 3,205]

" Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users."

Edited June 1, 2010 by Kathryn41

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Well, you better get your scissors out then!

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Is this a personal attack? I mean, I didn't report it at the time. But it definitely takes away from my enjoyment of the service.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/258340-can-i-marry-without-a-k-1/page__view__findpost__p__3967044

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I'll be the first to admit I probably deserved to have my posts stripped out there. But I just looked at that link and I have to say it certainly looks like He Who Must Not Be Named had a pop at Johnny there, in his usual condescending fashion.

[ValerieA 350]

I often see people called douchebags on here, and not in a funny way. I would consider that a personal attack, and an immature way to try to win a debate.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Hey what the hell anyway.

I'm just trying to figure out what goes on these days.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

There is definitely a difference between me calling an entire class of VJ people douchebags, and singling someone out and calling them a specific douchebag. Or so I feel.

Some people just get away with more than others, and have for some time. All the likes of you and I can do is continue to call BS on it. In a totally non-TOS'y way.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

There is definitely a difference between me calling an entire class of VJ people douchebags, and singling someone out and calling them a specific douchebag. Or so I feel.

Some people just get away with more than others, and have for some time. All the likes of you and I can do is continue to call BS on it. In a totally non-TOS'y way.

I thought that's what we were doing!

Bother, now I've spilled my drink.

[Kathryn41 3,205]

You may wish to review this thread - first post: http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/322-tos-violations-and-moderator-responses/ There are a number of points Captain Ewok presents about how VJ is moderated that may help you understand how moderation decisions take place.

As always, if you disagree with a moderator's decision, you are welcome to refer the matter directly to Captain Ewok who will review the matter and reach his own impartial decision.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I thought that's what we were doing!

Bother, now I've spilled my drink.

Now you've made me cry at the thought of all that lost alcohol.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Kathryn, it's not worth a fight to me. Seriously.

Oh btw I read all that the other day. But thanks for pointing it out.

[ValerieA 350]

There is definitely a difference between me calling an entire class of VJ people douchebags, and singling someone out and calling them a specific douchebag. Or so I feel.

Some people just get away with more than others, and have for some time. All the likes of you and I can do is continue to call BS on it. In a totally non-TOS'y way.

I completely agree.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

Now you've made me cry at the thought of all that lost alcohol.

Relax. It wasn't Tanqueray.

[ValerieA 350]

Now you've made me cry at the thought of all that lost alcohol.

Jeez, Johnny, be careful!