Palin stumped on Bush doctrine

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

You see - you make these assumptions and you just come away looking stupid.

I can't vote remember... so whoever wins the election it's ultimately irrelevant to me.

The Republicans have had their 8 years, time for a new face. Even if he does turn out to be a Tony Blair.

[Ban Hammer 12,827]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/11/p...m_n_125818.html

No thanks I dont want to get a virus!

Republican brilliance.

By the way, Palin probably was too busy governing over the populace of Alaska, which is less than three major cities in the Bay Area -- San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose. I'm sure Gavin Newsom would be a far better VP pick.

so only individuals with a large population base need apply?

I guess you'd feel more comfortable with someone managing a corporation or managing a handful of people than millions of them. I mean, it's not like a VP who ends up President would be managing right? 9000, half a million, 300 million, all the same.

it's nice how you want to arbitrarily cut out a large percentage of the us population with that requirement.

and you wonder why the elitist label is throw around so much.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You see - you make these assumptions and you just come away looking stupid.

I can't vote remember... so whoever wins the election it's ultimately irrelevant to me.

The Republicans have had their 8 years, time for a new face. Even if he does turn out to be a Tony Blair.

Oh there are other issues too - but we won't get into those as doubtless you'll pull out that same old ####### about "lazy people" and "entitlement"...

Still it should perhaps be pointed out that you have never, once, given any impression that you vote on the issues as much as vote for the party - right back at 'ya

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

You see - you make these assumptions and you just come away looking stupid.

I can't vote remember... so whoever wins the election it's ultimately irrelevant to me.

The Republicans have had their 8 years, time for a new face. Even if he does turn out to be a Tony Blair.

Oh there are other issues too - but we won't get into those as doubtless you'll pull out that same old ####### about "lazy people" and "entitlement"...

Still it should perhaps be pointed out that you have never, once, given any impression that you vote on the issues as much as vote for the party - right back at 'ya

I didnt know it was my job to satisfy your need to know how I think on the issues.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You see - you make these assumptions and you just come away looking stupid.

I can't vote remember... so whoever wins the election it's ultimately irrelevant to me.

The Republicans have had their 8 years, time for a new face. Even if he does turn out to be a Tony Blair.

Oh there are other issues too - but we won't get into those as doubtless you'll pull out that same old ####### about "lazy people" and "entitlement"...

Still it should perhaps be pointed out that you have never, once, given any impression that you vote on the issues as much as vote for the party - right back at 'ya

I didnt know it was my job to satisfy your need to know how I think on the issues.

It isn't - but seeing as you feel its fine to make assumptions about me and my views I thought I'd return the favour.

Don't like - don't dish out