Apparent Sweetheart Plea Deal for New Black Panther Bombers

[lostinblue 1,989]

Apparent Sweetheart Plea Deal for New Black Panther Bombers

New Black Panther alleged terrorists plead to 7 years; had faced decades of prison time.

It looks like two members of the St. Louis Chapter of the New Black Panthers who planned multiple terrorist bombings around Ferguson, MO last year have been gifted a sweetheart plea deal from Obama’s Department of Justice, based upon reports by Fox News/Associated Press and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

Today Olajuwon Ali Davis (on left in the featured picture above) and Brandon Orlando Baldwin (aka Brandon Muhammad, on right in picture), both 22, changed their plea of “not guilty” to accept a plea arrangement in which they will each serve 7 years in Federal prison.

That means both men will be back on the street and free to continue terrorizing innocent people while still under the age of 30.

If convicted of the charges initially brought against them they would each have faced decades in prison.

The men were originally charged with plotting to kill Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch and then-Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson, and planning to blow up a Ferguson police station, police vehicles, and other area targets including (according to law enforcement sources) the famous St. Louis Gateway Arch monument.

Their plan for the Arch was to plant a bomb on the observation deck.

These intended terrorists were in the process of accumulating the necessary quantity of bombs in the days leading up to the non-indictment of Police Officer Darren Willson.

Fortunately they had to put their operations on hold when they ran out of funds, and had to wait until the EBT card owned by the girlfriend of one of the men was replenished. They were picked up by authorities shortly thereafter, before they could put any part of the terrorist plan into effect.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/06/apparent-sweetheart-plea-deal-for-new-black-panther-bombers/

That means both men will be back on the street and free to continue terrorizing innocent people while still under the age of 30.. Black Muslim privilege

[Boiler 43,429]

They are not Muslims.

[lostinblue 1,989]

They are not Muslims.

aka.... Brandon Muhammad .. strange he thinks so .

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Plea deals are common depending on the strength of a case and cost/risk of attempting to prosecute. Cry Black Privilege but it is less than clear that that is the best explanation.

[Boiler 43,429]

aka.... Brandon Muhammad .. strange he thinks so .

We know better.

[lostinblue 1,989]

Plea deals are common depending on the strength of a case and cost/risk of attempting to prosecute. Cry Black Privilege but it is less than clear that that is the best explanation.

Or the justice department just does not want to put the hammer down on these Muslim terrorist. They get the pass.

[Boiler 43,429]

Or the justice department just does not want to put the hammer down on these Muslim terrorist. They get the pass.

These are terrorists, not Muslims.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Plea deals are common depending on the strength of a case and cost/risk of attempting to prosecute. Cry Black Privilege but it is less than clear that that is the best explanation.

Yeah somehow that seems to be a better explanation than the nonsense idea that somehow the justice department is so afraid of appearing politically incorrect that they'd let out dangerous criminals to preserve their own image.

[Boiler 43,429]

Given enough time, a hypothetical chimpanzee typing at random would, as part of its output, almost surely produce one of Shakespeare's plays (or any other text)

.

Now I think about it that may be racist.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Plea deals are common depending on the strength of a case and cost/risk of attempting to prosecute. Cry Black Privilege but it is less than clear that that is the best explanation.

In the bunker, it's the only explanation.

[GandD 5,966]

A number of posts removed for violating the following stipulation of TOS:

Make comments in a Post either direct or implied toward another member that are purposely designed to upset, antagonize, make fun of, belittle, harass, insult, or otherwise instigate an argument that takes away from the personal enjoyment of the Service by other users.