Jump to content
aayitrun

Multiple traffic tickets - real experiences anyone?

 Share

31 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline

That's not correct, you can google it and you will hear people/lawyers say both sides. But here is why I believe you don't need to disclose it, and I personally wouldn't. The U.S. Government is asking you the question, and states won't report that information to the U.S. government. Even counties sometimes don't share with other counties. But when it's a felony or misdemeanor everyone knows about it. If you get a restraining order, are arrested, or even some misdemeanors will show up nationally. They aren't going to care about something they don't monitor to begin with. And then there's the fact that I had an agent at a USCIS office agree with me that they didn't care about traffic violations during an interview. Either way they are not going to cause any problems, even if you get so many speeding tickets you lose your license. Now if you get arrested for driving with out a license then maybe worry.

This is another reason I wouldn't state it, you're just going to confuse them.

That is an opinion, not a fact supported by the instructions. It is an opinion supported by some interview experiences and contradicted by others.

Why are we trying to guess what they want or don't want? There are lots of cases here, even in the past few months when people were sent home and asked to return with proof that they paid their traffic fines. I'm not sure how you missed them, because there are dozens. There are also many cases where people were specifically told that they have to mention tickets but that they won't have an effect.

Can I ask you why the naturalization guide specifically says that you don't need to send in supporting evidence for traffic tickets under $500? Why wouldn't they just say don't disclose them? In fact, why mention traffic tickets at all if they aren't interested in them?

And of course they care about things they don't monitor. If you tell them that you used to work as a guard at a camp for political prisoners, there's no way they're going to approve your application, but that's not something they monitor.

Look, in the end, no one is going to be denied for traffic tickets, but it's important to follow the instructions.

Using your line of thinking, I shouldn't have to mention my trips outside the US because I'm well within the physical presence limit so my trips won't matter.

Basically, there's lots of disagreement on this issue... people can answer the question fully and list all citations (since the question asks for all citations) or they can guess which citation USCIS wants to see.

Edited by JimmyHou

For a review of each step of my N-400 naturalization process, from application to oath ceremony, please click here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

That is an opinion, not a fact supported by the instructions. It is an opinion supported by some interview experiences and contradicted by others.

Why are we trying to guess what they want or don't want? There are lots of cases here, even in the past few months when people were sent home and asked to return with proof that they paid their traffic fines. I'm not sure how you missed them, because there are dozens. There are also many cases where people were specifically told that they have to mention tickets but that they won't have an effect.

Can I ask you why the naturalization guide specifically says that you don't need to send in supporting evidence for traffic tickets under $500? Why wouldn't they just say don't disclose them? In fact, why mention traffic tickets at all if they aren't interested in them?

And of course they care about things they don't monitor. If you tell them that you used to work as a guard at a camp for political prisoners, there's no way they're going to approve your application, but that's not something they monitor.

Look, in the end, no one is going to be denied for traffic tickets, but it's important to follow the instructions.

Using your line of thinking, I shouldn't have to mention my trips outside the US because I'm well within the physical presence limit so my trips won't matter.

Basically, there's lots of disagreement on this issue... people can answer the question fully and list all citations (since the question asks for all citations) or they can guess which citation USCIS wants to see.

Well there's two people here saying in interviews USCIS said citations don't matter, so I still believe your are trying to give them something that will just add confusion. Your mention of trips outside the US is exactly what will matter, because they will have a record of it. I guess your ability to comprehend is minimal. You helped prove my point it's what they will see on a federal/national database that matters. Nobody is getting deported for a speeding ticket so it really doesn't matter if you put it or not, but like the other guy my experience was the same the mention of a failure to stop for school bus ticket was just confusing and pointless. And the USCIS agent said that is not what they are concerned with and it got crossed out on the application. If you have an unpaid ticket it may be different, because that could very likely be reported.

At the end of the day show me one person who didn't put a speeding ticket and because of that got deported... then I will say you better put it down. And what about states like Florida, where you can get 1 ticket a year and take an online class and they will remove the ticket from your record. Do you report a speeding ticket that doesn't even exist anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not correct, you can google it and you will hear people/lawyers say both sides. But here is why I believe you don't need to disclose it, and I personally wouldn't. The U.S. Government is asking you the question, and states won't report that information to the U.S. government. Even counties sometimes don't share with other counties. But when it's a felony or misdemeanor everyone knows about it. If you get a restraining order, are arrested, or even some misdemeanors will show up nationally. They aren't going to care about something they don't monitor to begin with. And then there's the fact that I had an agent at a USCIS office agree with me that they didn't care about traffic violations during an interview. Either way they are not going to cause any problems, even if you get so many speeding tickets you lose your license. Now if you get arrested for driving with out a license then maybe worry.

This is another reason I wouldn't state it, you're just going to confuse them.

The question is asked on the N-400. Telling people not to answer it is poor advice. Follow the instructions and minimize potential problems.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline

That is an opinion, not a fact supported by the instructions. It is an opinion supported by some interview experiences and contradicted by others.

Why are we trying to guess what they want or don't want? There are lots of cases here, even in the past few months when people were sent home and asked to return with proof that they paid their traffic fines. I'm not sure how you missed them, because there are dozens. There are also many cases where people were specifically told that they have to mention tickets but that they won't have an effect.

Can I ask you why the naturalization guide specifically says that you don't need to send in supporting evidence for traffic tickets under $500? Why wouldn't they just say don't disclose them? In fact, why mention traffic tickets at all if they aren't interested in them?

And of course they care about things they don't monitor. If you tell them that you used to work as a guard at a camp for political prisoners, there's no way they're going to approve your application, but that's not something they monitor.

Look, in the end, no one is going to be denied for traffic tickets, but it's important to follow the instructions.

Using your line of thinking, I shouldn't have to mention my trips outside the US because I'm well within the physical presence limit so my trips won't matter.

Basically, there's lots of disagreement on this issue... people can answer the question fully and list all citations (since the question asks for all citations) or they can guess which citation USCIS wants to see.

I asked the same questions here on the site and made my own decision to disclose all the citations ( I have a bad habit of not having my license or insurance paperwork on me so I have maybe 6 or 7 in total) and my 1 speeding ticket. I also carried with me to the interview the documentation that shows that they were all handled in traffic court and paid or dismissed. If asked my opinion I would advise anyone to do the same.

That being said, the very person who interviewed me stated I did not need to disclose them. He said they were not criminal and not relevant. I understand people's hesitation to disclose in case it is used against you. My sister disclosed her tickets and ended up with a six month delay as the person who interviewed her was new and stated because of the tickets(i believe 2 speeding and a citation for tints) she had to redo her background check. She is a registered nurse who has never been in trouble with the law. I've had friends who did not disclose and were never asked about them. It's up to each individual's interpretation of the instructions.

I believe the instructions on the form needs to be defined but until there is a revision just go with listing everything and hope for the best.

Edited by kamw

09/27/14 Married :content:

12/03/14 Became a US citizen :star:

. .

02/25/15 130 Petition sent

02/27/15 NOA1 date :clock:

07/23/15 NOA2 date

08/03/15 Mailed to NVC

08/07/15 NVC Received

08/19/15 Case number assigned, submitted DS-261

08/20/15 Paid AOS bill

08/25/15 Received welcome letter

08/25/15 Sent AOS & IV package

08/31/15 DS-261 reviewed

08/31/15 AOS & IV scan date confirmed by Sup.

09/02/15 Received IV bill by email

09/03/15 Paid IV bill

09/09/15 Submitted DS-260

09/17/15 Case Completed @ NVC

10/06/15 Expedite Request sent to NVC

11/12/15 Contacted Sen. Marco Rubio for assistance with expedite by email

11/19/15 Expedite Approved

12/9/15 Medical

12/11/15 Interview (Approved)

12/14/15 CEAC Status changed to AP

12/15/15 CEAC Status Changed to Issued

12/18/15 Picked up Passport & booked hubby's ticket.

12/31/15 Ring in the New Years together after 4 years!!!! :dancing:

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked the same questions here on the site and made my own decision to disclose all the citations ( I have a bad habit of not having my license or insurance paperwork on me so I have maybe 6 or 7 in total) and my 1 speeding ticket. I also carried with me to the interview the documentation that shows that they were all handled in traffic court and paid or dismissed. If asked my opinion I would advise anyone to do the same.

That being said, the very person who interviewed me stated I did not need to disclose them. He said they were not criminal and not relevant. I understand people's hesitation to disclose in case it is used against you. My sister disclosed her tickets and ended up with a six month delay as the person who interviewed her was new and stated because of the tickets(i believe 2 speeding and a citation for tints) she had to redo her background check. She is a registered nurse who has never been in trouble with the law. I've had friends who did not disclose and were never asked about them. It's up to each individual's interpretation of the instructions.

I believe the instructions on the form needs to be defined but until there is a revision just go with listing everything and hope for the best.

As the instructions currently stand, you are supposed to list citations. If you received a citation and answer the question no, you are lying. Period. Maybe USCIS doesn't hold tickets against you, but lying on the N-400 is not the way to find out.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Posts advocating lying or failure to disclose have been removed, and some others have been left in the thread because of the solid refutation. Any further such posts or defenses of them will result in thread-bans or worse.

The N-400 instructions say to disclose all such incidents, and that's it. There is no more debate.

TBoneTX

VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline

Well there's two people here saying in interviews USCIS said citations don't matter, so I still believe your are trying to give them something that will just add confusion. Your mention of trips outside the US is exactly what will matter, because they will have a record of it. I guess your ability to comprehend is minimal. You helped prove my point it's what they will see on a federal/national database that matters. Nobody is getting deported for a speeding ticket so it really doesn't matter if you put it or not, but like the other guy my experience was the same the mention of a failure to stop for school bus ticket was just confusing and pointless. And the USCIS agent said that is not what they are concerned with and it got crossed out on the application. If you have an unpaid ticket it may be different, because that could very likely be reported.

At the end of the day show me one person who didn't put a speeding ticket and because of that got deported... then I will say you better put it down. And what about states like Florida, where you can get 1 ticket a year and take an online class and they will remove the ticket from your record. Do you report a speeding ticket that doesn't even exist anymore?

You are wrong, and you're being rude, but I'm going to reply anyway (more politely than you've replied).

My ability to comprehend is minimal? Really? That's constructive.

Who's talking about getting deported?

I didn't prove your point, you made up a theory that USCIS only cares about things they monitor... I'm saying that's a theory, which may be right, but that's not what the form is asking for; it's asking for citations. It's actually a very odd theory. Why would they ask you to only list things they monitor and already know about? Why would they ask you to sit there and list all your trips when they know exactly what they all are? They want you to be honest and list things they may have missed.

USCIS doesn't monitor travel, but it has access to the CBP database because USCIS and CBP both sit within DHS so they have full access to each others' databases. It's not as direct for USCIS to get your driving record, but if Geico and Progressive can get it in 30 seconds while you're on the phone, I'm pretty sure USCIS can too... as has been stated by several people who have had this happen at their interviews.

As for your question about tickets that "don't even exist anymore", the answer is in the the naturalization guide and the uscis policy manual. They explicitly state that all arrests or citations need to be reported even if the record of the incident has been expunged by the court.

You also seem to be confusing the fact that traffic tickets shouldn't affect your application with the fact that you're still supposed to list them. There's lots of information on the N400 that won't affect your application but that you still have to list honestly.

Edited by JimmyHou

For a review of each step of my N-400 naturalization process, from application to oath ceremony, please click here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline

For everyone else, please read this interview experience (actually two interview experiences for a husband and wife). Please understand that many interviewers aren't all that interested in traffic citations, but here's a case where two interviewers were interested; one specifically mentioned that the tickets had to be listed. This was in May 2014. There are many other cases where the issue of tickets never came up; so just make your own decision about what to list.

http://www.***removed***/forum/showthread.php/124392-My-quite-instructive-naturalization-interview-experience



My quite instructive naturalization interview experience

I, along with my wife, applied for Naturalization on Feb 24th, 2014. While preparing the form, we both were debating whether to disclose the traffic citations (we both had one of each, hers was a speeding ticket in PA, mine a careless driving ticket it in NJ which was later dialed down to Obstruction of Traffic with no points). Both tickets had fines less than $100 and there are many places (including some USCIS literature) that states that if the fine is less than $500, no need to disclose those or at least submit paperwork for those. After researching for quite a while, we reached the conclusion that it all depends on the Interviewing Officer (IO) so better to disclose them.

We received our Interview Appointment letters in April (Mount Laurel, NJ) and after a week we both got pink colored letters that said that since we had indicated that we had had cited by a law enforcement officer, we must bring to our interview the certified court dispositions to the resolutions of those citations. I got mine from my municipal court (took a week) but since my wife had pleaded guilty to speeding and paid online, there wasn't any court disposition. So, as the next best thing, she went to the DMV and got her driving record transcript that said that she was a driver in good standing. We collected these documents even though the pink letter said no paper work is needed for traffic violations not involving alcohol and drugs and the fine was lesser than $500. We took those documents with us any way.

I lucked out at having probably the best and most polite IO. The lady was really courteous and kind. We zipped through the initial phase. I got my first 6 civic questions rights so she stopped there. She asked me if I was still with the same employer and I said no and gave her a letter from my new employer confirming my job change.

Then came the question of the traffic ticket. I gave her the certified court disposition with the fine of $36. She looked and sighed and said, "unfortunately, that's not enough. I need a certified copy of the police report". I told her that the pink letter stated that if the fine is less than $500, no paperwork is needed. She said that despite that letter saying that, the police report is a statutory requirement. I was bummed and she probably saw that. She told me that ordinarily, she would ask the applicant to mail the police report and then reschedule the interview, but in my case, she would make an exemption and if I can get the report back to her by 2:00 pm, she would recommend me for the approval.

In the meantime, my wife was being interviewed in the other office. She wasn't as lucky as I was when it comes to IO. After going through all the questions, the lady asked my wife if she was sure she was never arrested. My wife said that she was absolutely sure. At this point, her IO went out and brought someone else in who looked at the computer and said that well, there was something wrong with her background. After 5 minutes of going through stuff, the second IO said, "ah! it's not an arrest. It's a speeding ticket. Did you mention that on your N-400?" and my wife said that of course she had to which the second IO said, "good for you". My wife got the oath appointment for 3:00 pm and then we rushed back to the police station to get my police report.

With the certified copy in hand, I went back to Mount Laurel and asked to see the IO I had seen in the morning. She came out and ushered me back into her office. I handed her the police report. She didn't even read it. She just put it in the file and gave me the oath form.

And now we are proud US citizens.

Moral of the story: Disclose everything and if it's a traffic violation, go with the disposition AND the police report.

For a review of each step of my N-400 naturalization process, from application to oath ceremony, please click here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

You are wrong, and you're being rude, but I'm going to reply anyway (more politely than you've replied).

My ability to comprehend is minimal? Really? That's constructive.

Who's talking about getting deported?

I didn't prove your point, you made up a theory that USCIS only cares about things they monitor... I'm saying that's a theory, which may be right, but that's not what the form is asking for; it's asking for citations. It's actually a very odd theory. Why would they ask you to only list things they monitor and already know about? Why would they ask you to sit there and list all your trips when they know exactly what they all are? They want you to be honest and list things they may have missed.

They want to catch you in a lie, which is why they ask questions they already know the answers to. As the moderator stated their is no debate. I suggest anyone does a lot of research, there are tons of examples on the internet that disagree. My experience included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

They want to catch you in a lie, which is why they ask questions they already know the answers to. As the moderator stated their is no debate. I suggest anyone does a lot of research, there are tons of examples on the internet that disagree. My experience included.

Your words scared me completely now...Because when I was filling out my N400 I didn't indicate my speeding tickets and a red light stop violation - not because I wanted to hide something but because I was under impression (and my attorney suggested the same) that they're only concerned with criminal charges or citations over $500. However, my lawyer did say that for the interview I would need to bring court dispositions and proof of all paid traffic violations, and that I would need to tell them about my all citations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline

Your words scared me completely now...Because when I was filling out my N400 I didn't indicate my speeding tickets and a red light stop violation - not because I wanted to hide something but because I was under impression (and my attorney suggested the same) that they're only concerned with criminal charges or citations over $500. However, my lawyer did say that for the interview I would need to bring court dispositions and proof of all paid traffic violations, and that I would need to tell them about my all citations.

No need to worry at all. Just bring it up at the interview and take the relevant paperwork.

For a review of each step of my N-400 naturalization process, from application to oath ceremony, please click here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Alright guys. Let's not get into a pissing contest. What we are trying to guage here is the impact on the application from traffic tickets with regards to GMC. I think the USCIS is pretty smart at figuring things out so hiding anything is silly.

2006 - Entered US on F-1
2009 - COS to H-1
2011 - Married USC

Conditional GC Process:
04/2012 - Concurrent I-130 petition / I-485 AOS / I-765 EAD / I-131 AP sent
35 days to biometrics, 73 days to EAD/AP combo card, 85 days to interview, 96 days to Conditional Green Card

04/2014 - Eligible for ROC

06/2014 - I-751 package filing joint with spouse sent

5 days to extension,37 days to biometrics, 172 days to CSC transfer, 247 days to Green Card

04/2015 - Eligible for Citizenship

09/2015 - N-400 package filing on basis of USC spouse sent

29 days to biometrics, 105 days to interview, 147 days to oath and US citizenship

~ 9 years and 6 months from first entry to US citizenship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Brazil
Timeline

I just got my interview letter and here are the exact instructions regarding traffic tickets, therefore, I'm not going to worry about at all about my tickets.

http://goo.gl/F2W2nI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

I just got my interview letter and here are the exact instructions regarding traffic tickets, therefore, I'm not going to worry about at all about my tickets.

http://goo.gl/F2W2nI

Those instructions make sense, it is exactly the level at which a good employer would look at. Basically anything under a DUI isn't important. I'm sure eventually someone will link something else that contradicts this. From the experiences I've heard of putting down traffic tickets won't get you denied, but it could lengthen the process a couple of extra weeks. Not including traffic tickets also won't get you denied, haven't heard of anyone talk about waiting longer because of not including traffic tickets. I think this is a common sense move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...