Jump to content
The Nature Boy

Georgia teen who got donated heart dies in crime spree: cops

 Share

68 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

I have to wonder how badly his family was in debt. When you have a kid with a serious medical condition like that, it costs a boatload of money. Even in a country with socialized medicine, keeping a kid with a serious medical condition alive accumulates debt. In America, I can only imagine that is exponentially worse.

When people grow up in poverty, whether they see their parents having just given up and live on welfare OR having worked their butts off and not gone anywhere, it's easy to see where someone would get the idea that the only way to toss things up and get an actual chance would be crime.

It's just a shame that he made such awful choices with his second chance, though I do question how much those choices were choices with better options and how much they were just one more bad option in a list of bad options.

Met in 2010 on a forum for a mutual interest. Became friends.
2011: Realized we needed to evaluate our status as friends when we realized we were talking about raising children together.

2011/2012: Decided we were a couple sometime in, but no possibility of being together due to being same sex couple.

June 26, 2013: DOMA overturned. American married couples ALL have the same federal rights at last! We can be a family!

June-September, 2013: Discussion about being together begins.

November 13, 2013: Meet in person to see if this could work. It's perfect. We plan to elope to Boston, MA.

March 13, 2014 Married!

May 9, 2014: Petition mailed to USCIS

May 12, 2014: NOA1.
October 27, 2014: NOA2. (5 months, 2 weeks, 1 day after NOA1)
October 31, 2014: USCIS ships file to NVC (five days after NOA2) Happy Halloween for us!

November 18, 2014: NVC receives our case (22 days after NOA2)

December 17, 2014: NVC generates case number (50 days after NOA2)

December 19, 2014: Receive AOS bill, DS-261. Submit DS-261 (52 days after NOA2)

December 20, 2014: Pay AOS Fee

January 7, 2015: Receive, pay IV Fee

January 10, 2015: Complete DS-260

January 11, 2015: Send AOS package and Civil Documents
March 23, 2015: Case Complete at NVC. (70 days from when they received docs to CC)

May 6, 2015: Interview at Montréal APPROVED!

May 11, 2015: Visa in hand! One year less one day from NOA1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is CEHST. Please leave your favorite mythical characters out of the discussion at hand.

What was that Jesus said about judging others? Also, he was 17. Teenagers aren't exactly famous for making great decisions at the best of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Ireland
Timeline

This is CEHST. Please leave your favorite mythical characters out of the discussion at hand.

I can believe in Jesus the person without necessarily believing in Jesus son of God. The Christian bible has had a large influence on western philosophy, so I don't see the problem talking about characters from the bible. Also, seeing as a large percentage of Americans claim to believe in Christianity, shouldn't they be expected to follow the teachings of the person the religion is based upon?

Oct 19, 2010 I-130 application submitted to US Embassy Seoul, South Korea

Oct 22, 2010 I-130 application approved

Oct 22, 2010 packet 3 received via email

Nov 15, 2010 DS-230 part 1 faxed to US Embassy Seoul

Nov 15, 2010 Appointment for visa interview made on-line

Nov 16, 2010 Confirmation of appointment received via email

Dec 13, 2010 Interview date

Dec 15, 2010 CR-1 received via courier

Mar 29, 2011 POE Detroit Michigan

Feb 15, 2012 Change of address via telephone

Jan 10, 2013 I-751 packet mailed to Vermont Service CenterJan 15, 2013 NOA1

Jan 31, 2013 Biometrics appointment letter received

Feb 20, 2013 Biometric appointment date

June 14, 2013 RFE

June 24, 2013 Responded to RFE

July 24, 2013 Removal of conditions approved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

I can believe in Jesus the person without necessarily believing in Jesus son of God. The Christian bible has had a large influence on western philosophy, so I don't see the problem talking about characters from the bible. Also, seeing as a large percentage of Americans claim to believe in Christianity, shouldn't they be expected to follow the teachings of the person the religion is based upon?

Behold the Man!

Worth a read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that is sad, is that a person who was not donor eligible, was put ahead of those who did qualify simply because of he color of his skin and the threat of someone screaming racism.

Him being a gangster or straight A student is irrelevant. Someone did not get a heart and died simply because of the color of someones skin.

Oddly the very groups and people that scream racism the most give this a big thumbs up.

So how would many of you feel if a white kid was put ahead of a black because of the color of his skin. This is the 1920's again, only its politically correct to be a racist if you are black and the roles are reversed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

The only thing that is sad, is that a person who was not donor eligible, was put ahead of those who did qualify simply because of he color of his skin and the threat of someone screaming racism.

Him being a gangster or straight A student is irrelevant. Someone did not get a heart and died simply because of the color of someones skin.

Oddly the very groups and people that scream racism the most give this a big thumbs up.

So how would many of you feel if a white kid was put ahead of a black because of the color of his skin. This is the 1920's again, only its politically correct to be a racist if you are black and the roles are reversed.

He was not donor eligible because they felt he would not be compliant with medications. This is not based on his medical history, it is based on cost. He didn't have any other history of non compliance.

Medically, he was a good candidate for a heart transplant. Not based on skin color, based on age. In any other country his age alone would have had him at the top of the list.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was not donor eligible because they felt he would not be compliant with medications. This is not based on his medical history, it is based on cost. He didn't have any other history of non compliance.

Medically, he was a good candidate for a heart transplant. Not based on skin color, based on age. In any other country his age alone would have had him at the top of the list.

LOL Oh yes, Him being non compliant had nothing to do with his medical history. DuH OH You can't make this stuff up.. That's VJ gold right there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

LOL Oh yes, Him being non compliant had nothing to do with his medical history. DuH OH You can't make this stuff up.. That's VJ gold right there

If you have some knowledge of his medical history, you should post it. You "expert" opinion doesn't really account for anything. There was no medical basis that I can see for the hospital to determine non compliance, which is why the hospital had to wipe the egg of their face.

If you are talking about behavioral non-compliance, which is a different issue, and a more subjective one, then we should take all the smokers and obese people off the transplant list too. And then it's a short list.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

LOL Oh yes, Him being non compliant had nothing to do with his medical history. DuH OH You can't make this stuff up.. That's VJ gold right there

Imagine, for a moment, being a young teenager. You're fifteen years old. You've been healthy your whole life. You've never had a problem. Then suddenly, you have problems sleeping. Your chest hurts. You're told you have 3-6 months to live. It's a death sentence. You have no prior medical history to tell doctors whether you'll be compliant with medications, because until now, you have been healthy. You've made serious mistakes in your life, but you're fifteen.

They tell you that teenagers often are non-compliant. There's your first mark against you--based solely on age. They point out that you're bad at school--maybe because you just can't be bothered, maybe because of problems in school with other kids, maybe because the teachers don't actually care about their jobs, maybe because you've got an undiagnosed learning disability. It bears noting that poor people are much less likely to be diagnosed with even severe learning disabilities and that people of colour often get less attention from teachers. Strike two. You've got into some fights and the police got involved in that. You're on house arrest. It bears noting that black teenage boys are far more likely to go to jail or receive sentencing for fighting than white teenage boys or teenage girls of either race. Strike three.

Because you are a teenage boy who has made mistakes and you are not good at school, you have now been sentenced to die. It has nothing to do with your medical history, because you DO NOT HAVE a medical history. The heart problem that affected Anthony Stokes came up over the course of the summer where he was 15 and within only a short amount of time, not long enough to get any actual history of MEDICAL compliance established, he was sentenced to die.

That's why people challenged the hospital decision. Because he was a child without a history of medical non-compliance. The hospital even said, in the news, that people could be denied a spot on the transplant list simply because they lacked family members to drive them to the hospital as often as they might need in the time after the transplant--and so due to no fault of their own, the crime of simply not having family, they might be denied a heart due to 'non-compliance.'

Met in 2010 on a forum for a mutual interest. Became friends.
2011: Realized we needed to evaluate our status as friends when we realized we were talking about raising children together.

2011/2012: Decided we were a couple sometime in, but no possibility of being together due to being same sex couple.

June 26, 2013: DOMA overturned. American married couples ALL have the same federal rights at last! We can be a family!

June-September, 2013: Discussion about being together begins.

November 13, 2013: Meet in person to see if this could work. It's perfect. We plan to elope to Boston, MA.

March 13, 2014 Married!

May 9, 2014: Petition mailed to USCIS

May 12, 2014: NOA1.
October 27, 2014: NOA2. (5 months, 2 weeks, 1 day after NOA1)
October 31, 2014: USCIS ships file to NVC (five days after NOA2) Happy Halloween for us!

November 18, 2014: NVC receives our case (22 days after NOA2)

December 17, 2014: NVC generates case number (50 days after NOA2)

December 19, 2014: Receive AOS bill, DS-261. Submit DS-261 (52 days after NOA2)

December 20, 2014: Pay AOS Fee

January 7, 2015: Receive, pay IV Fee

January 10, 2015: Complete DS-260

January 11, 2015: Send AOS package and Civil Documents
March 23, 2015: Case Complete at NVC. (70 days from when they received docs to CC)

May 6, 2015: Interview at Montréal APPROVED!

May 11, 2015: Visa in hand! One year less one day from NOA1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

You mean the medical history of him destroying the heart from the first transplant?

Can you cite where he had two transplants? I can't find any news story reporting this, even ones condemning the family.

Met in 2010 on a forum for a mutual interest. Became friends.
2011: Realized we needed to evaluate our status as friends when we realized we were talking about raising children together.

2011/2012: Decided we were a couple sometime in, but no possibility of being together due to being same sex couple.

June 26, 2013: DOMA overturned. American married couples ALL have the same federal rights at last! We can be a family!

June-September, 2013: Discussion about being together begins.

November 13, 2013: Meet in person to see if this could work. It's perfect. We plan to elope to Boston, MA.

March 13, 2014 Married!

May 9, 2014: Petition mailed to USCIS

May 12, 2014: NOA1.
October 27, 2014: NOA2. (5 months, 2 weeks, 1 day after NOA1)
October 31, 2014: USCIS ships file to NVC (five days after NOA2) Happy Halloween for us!

November 18, 2014: NVC receives our case (22 days after NOA2)

December 17, 2014: NVC generates case number (50 days after NOA2)

December 19, 2014: Receive AOS bill, DS-261. Submit DS-261 (52 days after NOA2)

December 20, 2014: Pay AOS Fee

January 7, 2015: Receive, pay IV Fee

January 10, 2015: Complete DS-260

January 11, 2015: Send AOS package and Civil Documents
March 23, 2015: Case Complete at NVC. (70 days from when they received docs to CC)

May 6, 2015: Interview at Montréal APPROVED!

May 11, 2015: Visa in hand! One year less one day from NOA1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

That's why people challenged the hospital decision. Because he was a child without a history of medical non-compliance. The hospital even said, in the news, that people could be denied a spot on the transplant list simply because they lacked family members to drive them to the hospital as often as they might need in the time after the transplant--and so due to no fault of their own, the crime of simply not having family, they might be denied a heart due to 'non-compliance.'

People are denied because of subjective things like social and behavioral factors, but this is different than a history of non-compliance which is a specific term to state that the patient has a history of not following a prescribed treatment regimen. He obviously had behavioral risk factors and in the end the doctors were right to be pessimistic about his past behavior, but they were not right to say the had a history of non-compliance.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

People are denied because of subjective things like social and behavioral factors, but this is different than a history of non-compliance which is a specific term to state that the patient has a history of not following a prescribed treatment regimen. He obviously had behavioral risk factors and in the end the doctors were right to be pessimistic about his past behavior, but they were not right to say the had a history of non-compliance.

Yeah. It's stupid. They make the decision based on 'well, someone else did this, so we're judging YOU on it.'

Met in 2010 on a forum for a mutual interest. Became friends.
2011: Realized we needed to evaluate our status as friends when we realized we were talking about raising children together.

2011/2012: Decided we were a couple sometime in, but no possibility of being together due to being same sex couple.

June 26, 2013: DOMA overturned. American married couples ALL have the same federal rights at last! We can be a family!

June-September, 2013: Discussion about being together begins.

November 13, 2013: Meet in person to see if this could work. It's perfect. We plan to elope to Boston, MA.

March 13, 2014 Married!

May 9, 2014: Petition mailed to USCIS

May 12, 2014: NOA1.
October 27, 2014: NOA2. (5 months, 2 weeks, 1 day after NOA1)
October 31, 2014: USCIS ships file to NVC (five days after NOA2) Happy Halloween for us!

November 18, 2014: NVC receives our case (22 days after NOA2)

December 17, 2014: NVC generates case number (50 days after NOA2)

December 19, 2014: Receive AOS bill, DS-261. Submit DS-261 (52 days after NOA2)

December 20, 2014: Pay AOS Fee

January 7, 2015: Receive, pay IV Fee

January 10, 2015: Complete DS-260

January 11, 2015: Send AOS package and Civil Documents
March 23, 2015: Case Complete at NVC. (70 days from when they received docs to CC)

May 6, 2015: Interview at Montréal APPROVED!

May 11, 2015: Visa in hand! One year less one day from NOA1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline

Yeah. It's stupid. They make the decision based on 'well, someone else did this, so we're judging YOU on it.'

The inherent problem with subjective criteria is that they are subjective. I have a feeling if he had been from an affluent family but with similar behavior and history, it would not have been a factor.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...