Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
decocker

Poor Alabamians Sue Private Probation Company Profiting Off Their Debt

2 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Debtors' prisons may be a medieval legacy, but a series of recent lawsuits have drawn attention to the fact that the practice of incarcerating people unable to pay fines and fees remains widespread in present-day America.

Last month, when residents of the St. Louis, Missouri suburbs of Ferguson and Jennings sued the municipalities over their use of traffic tickets and court fines to raise revenue at the cost of poor residents, officials and activists noted that the scheme was not limited to those towns, nor to public entities.

The issue resurfaced again today after three Alabama residents filed a lawsuit accusing a private, for-profit company contracted by a local city to collect traffic fines and other citations, of violating federal racketeering laws by extorting payments from residents and threatening them with jail over their inability to pay.

The lawsuit, filed against Judicial Correction Services (JCS), a major private probation service, and its local manager, also accuses the city of Clanton of allowing the racket to exist by entering into a illegal contract with JCS, which works with more than 100 municipalities in Alabama and several more across the country.

JCS and the city of Clanton could not immediately be reached for comment Thursday.

The company — which essentially operates as a debt-collecting agency on behalf of the city — required people unable to pay their full fines upfront to pay additional fees of $40 — paid to the company directly — for each month they were in arrears. When people couldn't pay, JCS threatened to throw them in jail — and on a few occasions did so.

What the company didn't tell their debtors, is that they had a right to have those fees waived or their payments lowered. JCS had a form to request this adjustment, but never told clients about it. The city tacitly allowed the scheme to operate, the lawsuit alleges, and actually enabled it by signing a contract with JCS, without first holding a public bid, and by allowing the company to charge probation fees — both violations of Alabama law.

"The problem with that is not only the exploitative nature of that threat, it's also that it's just plainly untrue," Sam Brooke, a staff attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which brought the suit on behalf of the three Clanton residents, told VICE News.

"As a legal matter, people cannot be required to pay more than they are able to pay and they certainly cannot be incarcerated for their inability to pay."

But most people trapped into JCS's scheme don't know that, he said.

Roxanne Reynolds, a technician on an auto parts assembly line, is one of the plaintiffs in the suit that owed payments to JCS over traffic fines. She had already spent four days in jail after missing a hearing and the threat of more fines left her terrified.

JCS's Clanton manager, Steven Raymond, would show up to appointments with clients like Reynolds carrying handcuffs, and the company's logo was designed to resemble the badge of a law enforcement agency, even though JCS is not one.

"[Reynolds] would go and tell them, 'I'm not working right now, I don't have any more money to give you, here's my doctor's note'," Brooke said. "The response from Mr. Raymond was, 'that's not my problem.'"

Brook said that Reynolds then went without food, had her utilities cut, and skipped medication for her multiple sclerosis, until she could pay off her fines and the additional fees tacked onto them.

These intimidation tactics amount to a violation of the federal Racketeer Influences and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), the lawsuit alleges.

https://news.vice.com/article/poor-alabamians-sue-private-probation-company-profiting-off-their-debt?utm_source=vicenewsfb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how this lawsuit ends up.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×