Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Janelle2002

DOJ Invokes Separation-of-Powers As It Seeks to Unblock Obama's Executive Amnesty

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

DOJ Invokes Separation-of-Powers As It Seeks to Unblock Obama's Executive Amnesty
March 13, 2015 - 9:19 AM
Subscribe to Susan Jones RSS
Follow Susan Jones on Twitter
{C}
OBAMA-CHICAGO-AP%20PHOTO.jpg

President Obama speaking about his unilateral action on immigration in Chicago on Nov. 25, 2014. (AP Photo)

(CNSNews.com) - The Justice Department, in an "emergency motion" filed on Thursday, asked a federal appeals court to suspend a lower court's injunction "interfering with immigration enforcement."

The injunction, imposed last month by a U.S. District Court in Texas at the behest of 26 states, "offends basic separation-of-powers and federalism principles and impinges on core Executive functions," DOJ argued.

"The lower court's order is unprecedented and wrong," said the Justice Department's request for an emergency stay, filed with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday.

"The Constitution does not entitle States to intrude into the uniquely federal domain of immigration enforcement. Yet the district court has taken the extraordinary step of allowing a State to override the United States’ exercise of its enforcement discretion in the immigration laws."

Critics of President Obama's executive amnesty have used the same separation-of-powers argument against the president. They note that the Constitution does not allow the president to make immigration law.

Shortly after the midterm election in November, President Obama said he would defer deportation for millions of illegal aliens, granting them a pathway to live and work in the United States for up to three years.

In formally announcing his DAPA program (Deferred Action for Parents of Childhood Arrivals) to the nation for the first time, President Obama stated, “I just took an action to change the law.”

Even in the months and years before his announced the changes, Obama said on multiple occasions that he could not do what he ended up doing.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has argued that Obama's "unilateral actions" would "eliminate our current immigration laws and replace them with his own executive amnesty."

Sessions explained that Obama's actions were contrary to the law passed by Congress, because the president intends to grant illegal immigrants "work permits, photo IDs, access to trillions in Medicare and Social Security benefits over time, up to $35,000 in free cash tax credits, and the ability to take any job in America."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/doj-invokes-separation-powers-it-seeks-unblock-obamas-executive-amnesty

continued

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm.


Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

2mzcunl.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang. A public spanking. Well, a spanking that no one hears because mainstream media isn't watching

20121010_bigbird.jpg

A federal appeals court has turned aside the Obama Administration's proposal to accelerate its request for a stay of a lower judge's order blocking President Barack Obama's plan to give quasi-legal status and work permits to millions more illegal immigrants.
Edited by xxClosedxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×