Jump to content
slim

Blacks Benefit from FL "SYG" Law at Disproportionate Rate

 Share

83 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

African Americans benefit from Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law at a rate far out of proportion to their presence in the state’s population, despite an assertion by Attorney General Eric Holder that repealing “Stand Your Ground” would help African Americans.

Black Floridians have made about a third of the state’s total “Stand Your Ground” claims in homicide cases, a rate nearly double the black percentage of Florida’s population. The majority of those claims have been successful, a success rate that exceeds that for Florida whites.

Nonetheless, prominent African Americans including Holder and “Ebony and Ivory” singer Stevie Wonder, who has vowed not to perform in the Sunshine State until the law is revoked, have made “Stand Your Ground” a central part of the Trayvon Martin controversy.

Holder, who was pressured by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and other progressive groups to open a civil rights case against acquitted neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Martin, criticized Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” self-defense law in a speech Tuesday before the NAACP.

The law was not invoked by Zimmerman’s defense team but was included in instructions to the jury.

“We must confront the underlying attitudes, the mistaken beliefs and the unfortunate stereotypes that serve too often as the basis for police action and private judgments. Separate and apart from the case that has drawn the nation’s attention, it’s time to question laws that senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhood,” Holder said to applause in his speech before the NAACP Tuesday.

“These laws try to fix something that was never broken. There has always been a legal defense for using deadly force if — and the ‘if’ is important — if no safe retreat is available. But we must examine laws that take this further by eliminating the common-sense and age-old requirement that people who feel threatened have a duty to retreat, outside their home, if they can do so safely. By allowing and perhaps encouraging violent situations to escalate in public, such laws undermine public safety,” Holder said.

“The list of resulting tragedies is long and, unfortunately, has victimized too many who are innocent. It is our collective obligation; we must stand OUR ground to ensure — (cheers, applause, music) — we must stand our ground to ensure that our laws reduce violence, and take a hard look at laws that contribute to more violence than they prevent,” Holder said.

But approximately one third of Florida “Stand Your Ground” claims in fatal cases have been made by black defendants, and they have used the defense successfully 55 percent of the time, at the same rate as the population at large and at a higher rate than white defendants, according to a Daily Caller analysis of a database maintained by the Tampa Bay Times. Additionally, the majority of victims in Florida “Stand Your Ground” cases have been white.

African Americans used “Stand Your Ground” defenses at nearly twice the rate of their presence in the Florida population, which was listed at 16.6 percent in 2012.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/16/blacks-benefit-from-florida-stand-your-ground-law-at-disproportionate-rate/#ixzz2ZXbNg2dn

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Thailand
Timeline

You are quoting from a right wing conservative think tank blogging new source, I'm pretty sure they are not bias one bit, huh?.....give me a break!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Even when they win their case they have to spike the ball.

I didn't anticipate bad winner syndrome.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

Even when they win their case they have to spike the ball.

I didn't anticipate bad winner syndrome.

Who won?

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Who won?

GZ

And the rest of us lost

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

People falsely believe that SYG ends with claiming immunity under the statute. It doesn't. SYG impacts each and every self defense case in this state - including the Zimmermann case. Zimmermann would not have had a self-defense claim prior to the 2005 adoption of the SYG statute. Plain and simple. Being familiar with the statute, he would have stayed in his car and Martin would still be alive. It's just that simple. Justifiable homicides have tripled in Florida once SYG was adopted. Homicides have discontinued the decline they were on for years to spike once again. We had less than 900 homicides in 2005, more than 1,100 in 2006 and more than 1,200 in 2007. That's SYG for you. A law that actually costs lives. Just the way the NRA likes it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are quoting from a right wing conservative think tank blogging new source, I'm pretty sure they are not bias one bit, huh?.....give me a break!

C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

People falsely believe that SYG ends with claiming immunity under the statute. It doesn't. SYG impacts each and every self defense case in this state - including the Zimmermann case. Zimmermann would not have had a self-defense claim prior to the 2005 adoption of the SYG statute. Plain and simple. Being familiar with the statute, he would have stayed in his car and Martin would still be alive. It's just that simple. Justifiable homicides have tripled in Florida once SYG was adopted. Homicides have discontinued the decline they were on for years to spike once again. We had less than 900 homicides in 2005, more than 1,100 in 2006 and more than 1,200 in 2007. That's SYG for you. A law that actually costs lives. Just the way the NRA likes it.

SYG does not come into effect when he left the car... SYG would be in the play after TM punched him if at the point and he choose not to retreat and fight is when SYG comes in play.

From the evidence he did not have chance to retreat and he defended himself... which was self defense.

Also there is no comparing of the lady sent to prision for 20 yrs for firing warning shot... most of the stories you hear about her are incomplete.

Here is her own statement - An argument ensued, and Alexander said she feared for her life when she went out to her vehicle and retrieved the gun she legally owned. She came back inside and ended up firing a shot into the wall, which ricocheted into the ceiling.

Which show she was out of the house and she could had retreated and she did not.

Thats exactly what the judge said as well --- A judge threw out Alexander's "stand your ground" self-defense claim, noting that she could have run out of the house to escape her husband but instead got the gun and went back inside.

Edited by Harsh_77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People falsely believe that SYG ends with claiming immunity under the statute. It doesn't. SYG impacts each and every self defense case in this state - including the Zimmermann case. Zimmermann would not have had a self-defense claim prior to the 2005 adoption of the SYG statute. Plain and simple. Being familiar with the statute, he would have stayed in his car and Martin would still be alive. It's just that simple. Justifiable homicides have tripled in Florida once SYG was adopted. Homicides have discontinued the decline they were on for years to spike once again. We had less than 900 homicides in 2005, more than 1,100 in 2006 and more than 1,200 in 2007. That's SYG for you. A law that actually costs lives. Just the way the NRA likes it.

Dead wrong.

As has been pointed out here, getting out of your vehicle and asking questions doesn't preclude SYG. Even if they repeal SYG, the duty to flee doesn't commence until there is violence or the threat of violence.

You are quoting from a right wing conservative think tank blogging new source, I'm pretty sure they are not bias one bit, huh?.....give me a break!

Are their figures biased? Do the numbers lie?

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are quoting from a right wing conservative think tank blogging new source, I'm pretty sure they are not bias one bit, huh?.....give me a break!

I believe that is answer "C"?

C

Sorry dude I didn't see this post LOL

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People falsely believe that SYG ends with claiming immunity under the statute. It doesn't. SYG impacts each and every self defense case in this state - including the Zimmermann case. Zimmermann would not have had a self-defense claim prior to the 2005 adoption of the SYG statute. Plain and simple. Being familiar with the statute, he would have stayed in his car and Martin would still be alive. It's just that simple. Justifiable homicides have tripled in Florida once SYG was adopted. Homicides have discontinued the decline they were on for years to spike once again. We had less than 900 homicides in 2005, more than 1,100 in 2006 and more than 1,200 in 2007. That's SYG for you. A law that actually costs lives. Just the way the NRA likes it.

From 2006 to 2012 the number of violent crimes in Florida dropped from 129,501 to 93,965. That's SYG for you. A law that actually deters violent crime. Just the way the NRA likes it.

http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/d75b9423-91ea-4704-86c8-5beb8c50fb61/1971_fwd_totalcrime.aspx

If there are a few dead criminals littering the SYG wayside who really gives a dam?

Edited by himher

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Exhaustive studies of concealed carry laws has shown that while each jurisdiction, on a county by county basis, has experienced reductions in crime following the implementation of CC, the populations who beneift most are minorities and women. Not surprisingly (except for people with turds for brains) the biggest beneficaries of laws supporting self defense are those most often victimized by crimes against persons.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

GZ

And the rest of us lost

What did you lose? You can still carry a concealed .32 handgun to protect your son from "bears" idea9dv.gif You still have at least 6 guns under construction and you still have YOUR concealed carry license.

I did not lose anything. TM was already dead so he didn't lose anything

See post above re: "turds for brains"

Edited by Gary and Alla

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...