Jump to content

Gallery      Downloads      Example Forms      Processing Times      Embassy Info      Reviews: Embassy/USCIS & POE      VJ Affiliates     Members


  • Please log in to reply

The President's "Deferred Action" Program

#1 TBoneTX

TBoneTX

    Among the 99.44% HOSED at the Guayaquil consulate

  • Members, Organizer

Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:10 AM

This is an excerpt from a mainstream-media newspaper article on the President's "Deferred Action" program, whereby the children of illegal immigrants can apply for work permits:

No new [USCIS] workers have been hired to review the school records, sworn affidavits and other documentation each applicant is required to file. And no funds have been appropriated to pay added processing costs. Officials said the initial budget would be covered by the $465-per-application fee, and as more fees are collected, new staff will be hired.

An application for an undocumented farmworker to apply for legal amnesty under a program signed by President Reagan in 1986 cost the immigration agency $1,130 to process, two members of Congress wrote in an Aug. 7 letter to Janet Napolitano, secretary of Homeland Security.

In the past, not charging enough to review applications has "resulted in an enormous backlog of legal immigration benefits applications and very long processing wait times for legal immigrants and aspiring U.S. citizens," wrote Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) and Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa).

On Tuesday, Smith denounced the deferral program as a "magnet for fraud and abuse" designed to shore up Latino support for Obama. "There seems to be little if any mechanism in place for vetting fraudulent applications and documentation submitted by illegal immigrants," Smith said in a statement.

Applicants must mail completed forms and documentation to one of four immigration service centers: in Laguna Niguel; Dallas; Burlington, Vt.; or Lincoln, Neb.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-immigrant-kids-20120815,0,2097285.story

Two of the service centers are, of course, the CSC and the VSC.

Upwards of 1.7 million of these applications are expected as a conservative estimate. USCIS is probably under political pressure to make their processing a priority. Anyone who is concerned about the impact on processing times for legal-immigration petitions might wish to contact their Congressman and U.S. Senator, or else sit back and be aware that the standard processing times could be extended, by a short or long time.
  • 0
06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.
06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).
07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?
09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).
09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).
10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."
12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.
12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.
12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.
01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.
01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.
04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").
05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.
05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).
06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."
07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.
08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).
08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

#2 nargie

nargie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:21 AM

oh my GOD !!!! im crying right now ... it is not fair !!!!! :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:
y con el estupido consulado de gye ni siquiera puedo tener una visa de turista
  • 0

Posted ImagePosted Image

Based on timeline data, your I129f may be adjudicated between September 9, 2012 and September 14, 2012*.


#3 TBoneTX

TBoneTX

    Among the 99.44% HOSED at the Guayaquil consulate

  • Members, Organizer

Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:24 AM

oh my GOD !!!! im crying right now ... it is not fair !!!!! :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:
y con el estupido consulado de gye ni siquiera puedo tener una visa de turista

Well, let's see what happens. And at least the Quito embassy is beginning to issue tourist visas. Sorry if you're required to apply at Guayaquil for that.
  • 0
06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.
06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).
07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?
09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).
09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).
10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."
12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.
12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.
12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.
01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.
01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.
04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").
05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.
05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).
06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."
07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.
08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).
08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

#4 nargie

nargie

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:30 AM

Well, let's see what happens. And at least the Quito embassy is beginning to issue tourist visas. Sorry if you're required to apply at Guayaquil for that.

in Quito? how do u know ? and yes i required to apply in GYE :crying:
  • 0

Posted ImagePosted Image

Based on timeline data, your I129f may be adjudicated between September 9, 2012 and September 14, 2012*.


#5 TBoneTX

TBoneTX

    Among the 99.44% HOSED at the Guayaquil consulate

  • Members, Organizer

Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:32 AM

in Quito? how do u know ? and yes i required to apply in GYE :crying:

Several of my wife's relatives were granted visas, and the parents of another VJ member's wife just got theirs today.

Objectively speaking, you probably wouldn't have a great chance of getting a tourist visa unless you had substantial assets and strong ties to Ecuador. If you're involved in the I-129F process, you'd have close to a zero chance. Hang in there, however, si man. :)
  • 0
06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.
06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).
07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?
09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).
09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).
10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."
12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.
12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.
12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.
01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.
01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.
04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").
05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.
05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).
06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."
07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.
08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).
08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

#6 ClaireGio

ClaireGio

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 03:30 AM

Well I hope they stick by their rule : first come, first served! They're making a fortune out of this...
  • 0
April 30th 2011 Met in Las Vegas, NV at Paris Resort and Casino
June 4th 2012 Mailed I-129F from Salt Lake City, UT to Dallas, TX
June 6th 2012 Received in Dallas
June 11th 2012 Text/E-mail of NOA1
June 14th 2012 Received hardcopy of NOA1
August 16th 2012 Received text/e-mail of NOA2
August 27th 2012 NVC received petition
Sep 3rd 2012 Received Packet 3 from London Embassy

#7 ClaireGio

ClaireGio

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 03:32 AM

I kinda wish we were being processed at Nebraska. Something telling me that California is going to be SWAMPED pretty soon
  • 0
April 30th 2011 Met in Las Vegas, NV at Paris Resort and Casino
June 4th 2012 Mailed I-129F from Salt Lake City, UT to Dallas, TX
June 6th 2012 Received in Dallas
June 11th 2012 Text/E-mail of NOA1
June 14th 2012 Received hardcopy of NOA1
August 16th 2012 Received text/e-mail of NOA2
August 27th 2012 NVC received petition
Sep 3rd 2012 Received Packet 3 from London Embassy

#8 KTandTommy

KTandTommy

    Platinum Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 08:11 AM

Wait a sec...
Just saw this when reading the article

FOR THE RECORD:
Young immigrants: An article in the Aug. 15 Section A about a government program to help young illegal immigrants gain legal work status said that application forms must be mailed to centers in Laguna Niguel; Dallas; Burlington, Vt.; or Lincoln, Neb. The correct locations are Phoenix, Dallas or Chicago, depending on the applicant's home address.


Does that mean that they're not actually applying to CSC or VSC? Or that they just put their application in to Phoenix, Dallas or Chicago, and then it gets routed to the other service centres?
  • 0
Posted Image Posted Image

Posted Image




Currently: counting down to our big "friends & family" wedding on May 18


#9 ClaireGio

ClaireGio

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip

Posted 16 August 2012 - 12:06 PM

Was that an amendment? It would make sense for these petitions to be spread out everywhere, local uscis offices etc.

Where is the article?
  • 0
April 30th 2011 Met in Las Vegas, NV at Paris Resort and Casino
June 4th 2012 Mailed I-129F from Salt Lake City, UT to Dallas, TX
June 6th 2012 Received in Dallas
June 11th 2012 Text/E-mail of NOA1
June 14th 2012 Received hardcopy of NOA1
August 16th 2012 Received text/e-mail of NOA2
August 27th 2012 NVC received petition
Sep 3rd 2012 Received Packet 3 from London Embassy

#10 TBoneTX

TBoneTX

    Among the 99.44% HOSED at the Guayaquil consulate

  • Members, Organizer

Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:26 AM

It would make sense for these petitions to be spread out everywhere, local uscis offices etc.

This is probably what will happen.

Where is the article?

In the Los Angeles Times -- click the link in the original post, at the very bottom of the quoted portion.
  • 0
06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.
06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).
07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?
09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).
09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).
10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."
12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.
12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.
12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.
01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.
01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.
04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").
05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.
05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).
06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."
07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.
08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).
08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

#11 HK12

HK12

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip

Posted 17 August 2012 - 02:40 AM

Wait a sec...
Just saw this when reading the article



Does that mean that they're not actually applying to CSC or VSC? Or that they just put their application in to Phoenix, Dallas or Chicago, and then it gets routed to the other service centres?


Yes, it seems so. I read somewhere on the USCIS website (I cannot find the link right now, sorry) that the four Service Centers in Vermont, Nebraska, Texas, and California will be working on those petitions. I'd assume that Phoenix, Dallas, and chicago are just lockboxes that'll bundle up the petitions and send them on to the Service Centers.
  • 0

I am the beneficiary

K1 Visa
Feb. 29, 2012: I-129F sent
March 08, 2012: NOA1 (Vermont)
August 30, 2012: NOA2
Oct. 1, 2012: Packet 3 received
Nov. 3, 2012: Packet 4 received
Nov. 15, 2012: Interview - approved!
Jan. 18, 2013: POE New York Seaport
Feb. 02, 2013: Wedding

AOS
March 06, 2013: AOS Package sent
March 12, 2013: I-485, I-765, I-131 NOA's
March 29, 2013: Biometrics Appointment

May 10, 2013: EAD/AP approved

May 18, 2013: EAD/AP received
 


#12 ClaireGio

ClaireGio

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip

Posted 17 August 2012 - 07:04 AM

Bummer x
  • 0
April 30th 2011 Met in Las Vegas, NV at Paris Resort and Casino
June 4th 2012 Mailed I-129F from Salt Lake City, UT to Dallas, TX
June 6th 2012 Received in Dallas
June 11th 2012 Text/E-mail of NOA1
June 14th 2012 Received hardcopy of NOA1
August 16th 2012 Received text/e-mail of NOA2
August 27th 2012 NVC received petition
Sep 3rd 2012 Received Packet 3 from London Embassy

#13 Bayareaguy

Bayareaguy

    Platinum Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip

Posted 06 February 2013 - 12:06 AM

I kinda wish we were being processed at Nebraska. Something telling me that California is going to be SWAMPED pretty soon


You were correct.

Posted Image
  • 0




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.