Jump to content

VisaJourney.com Logo
Gallery      Form Downloads      Example Forms      Processing Times      Embassy Info      Reviews: Embassy/USCIS & POE      News     Members


Latest VJ Member Visa Approvals - Congratulations!


blank avatarAmanda & Justin
K1 Visa
Canada
Paul & Sherlyn
K1 Visa
United Arab Emirates
blank avatarS & A
K1 Visa
Iran
Gary & Lorna
K1 Visa
Jamaica
blank avatarAlexander & Ilmira
K1 Visa
Russia
Michael & Lorna
K1 Visa
United Kingdom
Pre & Brico
K1 Visa
Jamaica
Charity & Simo
K1 Visa
Morocco
He & Me
IR-1/CR-1 Visa
Malaysia
boo & piggy
IR-1/CR-1 Visa
Spain

Visa Interviews Today: Good Luck!!


Kate & Yunior
K1 Visa
Dominican Republic
blank avatarAna & marcos
IR-1/CR-1 Visa
Dominican Republic
Kim & Doug
K1 Visa
United Kingdom
Rebecca & Soufiane
K3 Visa
Morocco
blank avatarYamila & Luis
K1 Visa
Cuba
Keith & Mario
IR-1/CR-1 Visa
Venezuela
blank avatarKeith & Sanae
K1 Visa
Japan
blank avatarAR & BA
K1 Visa
Philippines
blank avatarKAZI & SAKIB
K1 Visa
Bangladesh
William & Maheen
K1 Visa
Bangladesh
blank avatarCathy & Neil
K1 Visa
Philippines
Dan & Yvette
K1 Visa
Philippines
blank avatarJames & Ksenia
K1 Visa
Russia
blank avatarTheodore & Piyaphorn
IR-1/CR-1 Visa
Thailand
blank avatarGreg & Inessa
K1 Visa
Ukraine
blank avatarPaJee & Karlo
K1 Visa
Philippines
bob & jean
K1 Visa
Philippines
arthur & rosalie
K1 Visa
Philippines
Len & Kay
K1 Visa
Philippines


  • Please log in to reply

Political Spending by Unions Far Exceeds Direct Donations

#1 The Postmaster

The Postmaster

    Misunderstood Member


  • Group: Closed
  • Joined: 07 Feb 2009

Posted 10 July 2012 - 10:04 AM

Political Spending by Unions Far Exceeds Direct Donations

Organized labor spends about four times as much on politics and lobbying as generally thought, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis, a finding that shines a light on an aspect of labor's political activity that has often been overlooked.

Previous estimates have focused on labor unions' filings with federal election officials, which chronicle contributions made directly to federal candidates and union spending in support of candidates for Congress and the White House.

But unions spend far more money on a wider range of political activities, including supporting state and local candidates and deploying what has long been seen as the unions' most potent political weapon: persuading members to vote as unions want them to.

The new figures come from a little-known set of annual reports to the Labor Department in which local unions, their national parents and labor federations have been required to detail their spending on politics and lobbying since 2005.

This kind of spending, which is on the rise, has enabled the largest unions to maintain and in some cases increase their clout in Washington and state capitals, even though unionized workers make up a declining share of the workforce. The result is that labor could be a stronger counterweight than commonly realized to "super PACs" that today raise millions from wealthy donors, in many cases to support Republican candidates and causes.

The hours spent by union employees working on political matters were equivalent in 2010 to a shadow army much larger than President Barack Obama's current re-election staff, data analyzed by the Journal show.

The usual measure of unions' clout encompasses chiefly what they spend supporting federal candidates through their political-action committees, which are funded with voluntary contributions, and lobbying Washington, which is a cost borne by the unions' own coffers. These kinds of spending, which unions report to the Federal Election Commission and to Congress, totaled $1.1 billion from 2005 through 2011, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The unions' reports to the Labor Department capture an additional $3.3 billion that unions spent over the same period on political activity.


http://online.wsj.co...4031850026.html

Edited by ☼, 10 July 2012 - 10:08 AM.

  • 0

#2 Obama 2012

Obama 2012

    Hard Rockin' DJ



Posted 10 July 2012 - 10:39 AM

Unions are no different than corporations at the end of the day.
  • 0
Posted Image

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed
2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC
2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee
3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!
8/14/2010 - Touched!
10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!
10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!
02/07/2011 - Medical!
03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

#3 X Factor

X Factor

    Smiling Supreme Member



Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:24 AM

Unions are no different than corporations at the end of the day.

Aha - but aren't corporations people?
  • 0

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13


#4 Obama 2012

Obama 2012

    Hard Rockin' DJ



Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:26 AM

Aha - but aren't corporations people?


Absolutely. They are a collective group of people just like unions. From employees, to managers, to board members, to share holders. Yup, sounds like Corporations are people to me. ;)
  • 0
Posted Image

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed
2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC
2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee
3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!
8/14/2010 - Touched!
10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!
10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!
02/07/2011 - Medical!
03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

#5 X Factor

X Factor

    Smiling Supreme Member



Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:30 AM

Absolutely. They are a collective group of people just like unions. From employees, to managers, to board members, to share holders. Yup, sounds like Corporations are people to me. ;)

:thumbs:

Posted Image
  • 0

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13


#6 X Factor

X Factor

    Smiling Supreme Member



Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:35 AM

Posted Image
  • 0

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13


#7 The Postmaster

The Postmaster

    Misunderstood Member


  • Group: Closed
  • Joined: 07 Feb 2009

Posted 10 July 2012 - 01:47 PM

Unions are no different than corporations at the end of the day.

Except that public employee unions clout is wholly funded by taxpayers, and by taking larger and larger portions of public employee salaries, they are diverting that money to lobbyists that urge government to spend even more money to grow the government payroll. Corporations do not.
  • 0

#8 Dan J

Dan J

    Member Title For Sale



Posted 11 July 2012 - 12:02 AM

Except that public employee unions clout is wholly funded by taxpayers, and by taking larger and larger portions of public employee salaries, they are diverting that money to lobbyists that urge government to spend even more money to grow the government payroll. Corporations do not.


Government contractors do the same thing, but few people complain about that. A good portion of the contract the company gets ends up going back to lobbying for more spending.
  • 0

keTiiDCjGVo


#9 The Postmaster

The Postmaster

    Misunderstood Member


  • Group: Closed
  • Joined: 07 Feb 2009

Posted 11 July 2012 - 09:50 AM

Government contractors do the same thing, but few people complain about that. A good portion of the contract the company gets ends up going back to lobbying for more spending.

True. If you are spending government money, you are working for the government. That is one reason why Congress can't seem to help themselves from spending money on weapons systems the armed services didn't request, or have any use for, and why bases that have nothing on them in use but a convenience store, a gas station, a super market, and a trailer park can't be closed. One of those places in our district is a former Coast Guard training center, that after 9/11, had to spend millions of dollars, to install an automatic barrier system, built a new security office with a private security contractor, and reroute incoming traffic. Yet, the place is not in use for any purpose other than housing a few dependents and the occasional retired service member. You can thank Lynn Woolsey for using her influence along with the rest of the SF Bay area liberals to keep that base open, and GWB, for not making an issue of it, although every single BRAC commission has recommended the place be closed and sold off.
  • 0


Back to Top ↑
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community.
It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account?
Sign in here.


Sign In Now


0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.