Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
I AM NOT THAT GUY

Political Spending by Unions Far Exceeds Direct Donations

9 posts in this topic Register to Ask a Question

Political Spending by Unions Far Exceeds Direct Donations

Organized labor spends about four times as much on politics and lobbying as generally thought, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis, a finding that shines a light on an aspect of labor's political activity that has often been overlooked.

Previous estimates have focused on labor unions' filings with federal election officials, which chronicle contributions made directly to federal candidates and union spending in support of candidates for Congress and the White House.

But unions spend far more money on a wider range of political activities, including supporting state and local candidates and deploying what has long been seen as the unions' most potent political weapon: persuading members to vote as unions want them to.

The new figures come from a little-known set of annual reports to the Labor Department in which local unions, their national parents and labor federations have been required to detail their spending on politics and lobbying since 2005.

This kind of spending, which is on the rise, has enabled the largest unions to maintain and in some cases increase their clout in Washington and state capitals, even though unionized workers make up a declining share of the workforce. The result is that labor could be a stronger counterweight than commonly realized to "super PACs" that today raise millions from wealthy donors, in many cases to support Republican candidates and causes.

The hours spent by union employees working on political matters were equivalent in 2010 to a shadow army much larger than President Barack Obama's current re-election staff, data analyzed by the Journal show.

The usual measure of unions' clout encompasses chiefly what they spend supporting federal candidates through their political-action committees, which are funded with voluntary contributions, and lobbying Washington, which is a cost borne by the unions' own coffers. These kinds of spending, which unions report to the Federal Election Commission and to Congress, totaled $1.1 billion from 2005 through 2011, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The unions' reports to the Labor Department capture an additional $3.3 billion that unions spent over the same period on political activity.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304782404577488584031850026.html

Edited by ☼

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unions are no different than corporations at the end of the day.

Except that public employee unions clout is wholly funded by taxpayers, and by taking larger and larger portions of public employee salaries, they are diverting that money to lobbyists that urge government to spend even more money to grow the government payroll. Corporations do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Except that public employee unions clout is wholly funded by taxpayers, and by taking larger and larger portions of public employee salaries, they are diverting that money to lobbyists that urge government to spend even more money to grow the government payroll. Corporations do not.

Government contractors do the same thing, but few people complain about that. A good portion of the contract the company gets ends up going back to lobbying for more spending.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Government contractors do the same thing, but few people complain about that. A good portion of the contract the company gets ends up going back to lobbying for more spending.

True. If you are spending government money, you are working for the government. That is one reason why Congress can't seem to help themselves from spending money on weapons systems the armed services didn't request, or have any use for, and why bases that have nothing on them in use but a convenience store, a gas station, a super market, and a trailer park can't be closed. One of those places in our district is a former Coast Guard training center, that after 9/11, had to spend millions of dollars, to install an automatic barrier system, built a new security office with a private security contractor, and reroute incoming traffic. Yet, the place is not in use for any purpose other than housing a few dependents and the occasional retired service member. You can thank Lynn Woolsey for using her influence along with the rest of the SF Bay area liberals to keep that base open, and GWB, for not making an issue of it, although every single BRAC commission has recommended the place be closed and sold off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Back to Top ↑

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.