Psychology Today published this article and then pulled it. Did they do the right thing?

[^_^ 5,021]

[웃 910]

What's the trick to save the entire website from top of scroll bar to bottom as an image like that....My snipping tool does not have a scroll down button, I only can get what is on the screen...

http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/8073/psychtoday2.png

[^_^ 5,021]

What's the trick to save the entire website from top of scroll bar to bottom as an image like that....

I use Snagit.

[justashooter 430]

people on cable tend to forget that they can just copy and paste text for those on lo-speed internet.

[justashooter 430]

wow, did i just read that? so black women are ugly, all blacks are less intelligent on average, and they still think they are the hottest critters on earth?

speaking as a man who has an eye for women, some black women are incredibly hot, and some white women are incredibly unlovely. IMHO they rate about the same on average. as far as asians and native americans, well the are all asians, ethnically. the paler skinned asians on either continent are usually thinner and more attractive, in my experience, prolly because they come from cultures that have adopted to less harsh environments in terms of weather.

IMHO the most beautiful women in the world have olive skin that ages well, and thick/long/dark hair, with slightly wider set eyes and wide cheekbones. the face should be shaped like a "sunflower seed", with a strong chin and well defined features. androgens should be present to some degree, and good physical fitness is always a plus (these two go together).

[TBoneTX 43,048]

IMHO the most beautiful women in the world have olive skin that ages well, and thick/long/dark hair, with slightly wider set eyes and wide cheekbones. the face should be shaped like a "sunflower seed", with a strong chin and well defined features. androgens should be present to some degree, and good physical fitness is always a plus (these two go together).

You forgot blonde wigs, si man.

In answer to the question in the thread title, the magazine probably wanted to avoid the uproar from the nonscientific crowd that would focus on perceived insults from scientific data.

Edited May 17, 2011 by TBoneTX

[justashooter 430]

You forgot blonde wigs, si man.

In answer to the question in the thread title, the magazine probably wanted to avoid the uproar from the nonscientific crowd that would focus on perceived insults from scientific data.

oh come on. psychology today? that rag is about as scientifically credible as people magazine. non-scientific? a psych degree is almost as easy to get as a teaching degree.

BTW, the wigs are bright reds and blues, lately.

Edited May 17, 2011 by justashooter

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Androgens? Why not just get an android

[Zero Sum 305]

You forgot blonde wigs, si man.

In answer to the question in the thread title, the magazine probably wanted to avoid the uproar from the nonscientific crowd that would focus on perceived insults from scientific data.

Like I commonly read here among self-appointed scientists.

Or experts on education, apparently.

[Danno 1,228]

I'm betting if they used looked at weight rather than race, it might be insightful.

Black females are so often overweight this would have to be a leading factor in the "grading".

One could project within the next two decades nearly 100% of black females will be obese.

Blacks Chicks are not alone in this trend.... they just seem to be leading.

Q: Did they do the right thing to pull the article?

yes of course, releasing studies like this only reinforces what people already know and it only adds the the burden of the Black women in our culture.

The numbers of single black women are astronomical, these reports only add to the uphill battle they already have.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You forgot blonde wigs, si man.

You called?