No, definitely *NOT* an excuse!!!
I agree with clearing up the backlog. Ignoring petitions will not make them go away, no matter what the reason for the holdup. It only creates a bigger problem. And these are not 'phone numbers'. These are PEOPLE'S LIVES. I like to think there is some sense of urgency on their part, but it's hard to believe that sometimes. Sad to think that even in hospital emergency waiting rooms, there have been patients who have gone ignored and the worst has happened. And if a hospital can treat people like that, it can certainly happen in a government agency.
Let's just hope they keep making headway in clearing up the mess they've created and get those earliest filers approved.
Full Version: Waiting on the VSC to make a decision?
VisaJourney.com > Marriage Based Immigration (K1, K2, K3, etc) to the USA > K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedures General Discussion > K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress Reports
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
QUOTE(psiprez @ Feb 19 2008, 09:41 AM) 
Let's just hope they keep making headway in clearing up the mess they've created and get those earliest filers approved.
I noticed you were touched on 2/17. That seems very strange unless you called and made an inquiry. I wonder what is going on. It is not normal that a January petition should be touched at this point. But then again... it is hard to identify what is "normal" at USCIS.
QUOTE(Bill y Bella @ Feb 19 2008, 10:00 AM)
I noticed you were touched on 2/17. That seems very strange unless you called and made an inquiry. I wonder what is going on. It is not normal that a January petition should be touched at this point. But then again... it is hard to identify what is "normal" at USCIS.
It is super weird...there were a bunch of us touched on the 17th. I'm thinking we were just moved into a box or something..lol
January filers getting touched? What is up?
I feel so horrible for the filers from months ago still waiting and waiting..it breaks my heart....
QUOTE(psiprez @ Feb 19 2008, 09:41 AM)
No, definitely *NOT* an excuse!!!
I agree with clearing up the backlog. Ignoring petitions will not make them go away, no matter what the reason for the holdup. It only creates a bigger problem. And these are not 'phone numbers'. These are PEOPLE'S LIVES. I like to think there is some sense of urgency on their part, but it's hard to believe that sometimes. Sad to think that even in hospital emergency waiting rooms, there have been patients who have gone ignored and the worst has happened. And if a hospital can treat people like that, it can certainly happen in a government agency.
Let's just hope they keep making headway in clearing up the mess they've created and get those earliest filers approved.
I agree with clearing up the backlog. Ignoring petitions will not make them go away, no matter what the reason for the holdup. It only creates a bigger problem. And these are not 'phone numbers'. These are PEOPLE'S LIVES. I like to think there is some sense of urgency on their part, but it's hard to believe that sometimes. Sad to think that even in hospital emergency waiting rooms, there have been patients who have gone ignored and the worst has happened. And if a hospital can treat people like that, it can certainly happen in a government agency.
Let's just hope they keep making headway in clearing up the mess they've created and get those earliest filers approved.
I am not jumping on you at all......forgive me if it sounds that way.....not my intent........It is just after waiting myself for 8 months for an approval and seeing 2 people who filed within days of me still waiting I have little or no acceptance for USCIS/VSC/CSC stupidity in reguards to this situation......I also can not be overly excited....knowing the anguish of these couples to be excited about 60 days or less approvals....sorry for offending anyone but this sucks for so many
Not that I wish long waits on anyone.....I do not....but it is unbelieveable and cruel to them to be this screwed up
BOooo! VSC!! just kidding! Im jealous to all of you guys...i filed mine on CSC.
Congratulations to all those who already received their NOA2.
CHEERS!
Congratulations to all those who already received their NOA2.
CHEERS!
Lora, how are you? Forgive my ignorance..or laziness for not surfing to find the info...but have you heard from Peru yet??? Any more news for you???
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
QUOTE(KimandRuss @ Feb 19 2008, 11:44 AM)
Lora, how are you? Forgive my ignorance..or laziness for not surfing to find the info...but have you heard from Peru yet??? Any more news for you???
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
Well Kim thanks for asking.....A funny thing happened on the way to the embassy........they sent only half of the info.........and instead of sending the other half down they had to send the other half up to be reassembled and send it back.......I guess that is why I have NO warm fuzzies or good feelings these days......The embassy in Lima has been great but they told me they could not accept an incomplete or 1/2 of a packet.......Luckily they called NVC and it was located quickily but it is yet another delay in this process from hell......It still has not left NVC for the second time.....I can not get an explaination as to why but it is still sitting.....at least complete now......in New Hampshire I hope not gathering dust again.......I call every day and they are all so nice but it is just a kinder version of USCIS to me at this point.....No info....no reason.....just check back in a couple of days......OMG I just want to choke something.........So you can see this is why I am in such a horrific mood
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 19 2008, 12:52 PM)
QUOTE(KimandRuss @ Feb 19 2008, 11:44 AM)
Lora, how are you? Forgive my ignorance..or laziness for not surfing to find the info...but have you heard from Peru yet??? Any more news for you???
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
Well Kim thanks for asking.....A funny thing happened on the way to the embassy........they sent only half of the info.........and instead of sending the other half down they had to send the other half up to be reassembled and send it back.......I guess that is why I have NO warm fuzzies or good feelings these days......The embassy in Lima has been great but they told me they could not accept an incomplete or 1/2 of a packet.......Luckily they called NVC and it was located quickily but it is yet another delay in this process from hell......It still has not left NVC for the second time.....I can not get an explaination as to why but it is still sitting.....at least complete now......in New Hampshire I hope not gathering dust again.......I call every day and they are all so nice but it is just a kinder version of USCIS to me at this point.....No info....no reason.....just check back in a couple of days......OMG I just want to choke something.........So you can see this is why I am in such a horrific mood
Lora...I can believe this since ours left the NVC center feb 13 and I was so excited until the guy said..."yeah it left for Montreal....and I almost chocked because that is the wrong embassy for us...it was supposed to go to VanCouver.....so we are in the process of trying to locate and get it moved....I hate this for you...this whole ordeal has been just that.....an ORDEAL!!!!!!!!!! kEEP US POSTED AND WE WILL DO THE SAME!!!!!!
QUOTE(charlene @ Feb 19 2008, 01:57 PM)
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 19 2008, 12:52 PM)
QUOTE(KimandRuss @ Feb 19 2008, 11:44 AM)
Lora, how are you? Forgive my ignorance..or laziness for not surfing to find the info...but have you heard from Peru yet??? Any more news for you???
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
When I started coming here to VJ in September so many people had already been waiting so long. Some of those same people are STILL waiting 5 months later while others are being approved in 60 days. Not to begrudge anyone else's approval because I certainly am happy for those couples and can only dream of a 60 day approval, but it really does seem so unfair and it makes you wonder what exactly is going on over there!
Well Kim thanks for asking.....A funny thing happened on the way to the embassy........they sent only half of the info.........and instead of sending the other half down they had to send the other half up to be reassembled and send it back.......I guess that is why I have NO warm fuzzies or good feelings these days......The embassy in Lima has been great but they told me they could not accept an incomplete or 1/2 of a packet.......Luckily they called NVC and it was located quickily but it is yet another delay in this process from hell......It still has not left NVC for the second time.....I can not get an explaination as to why but it is still sitting.....at least complete now......in New Hampshire I hope not gathering dust again.......I call every day and they are all so nice but it is just a kinder version of USCIS to me at this point.....No info....no reason.....just check back in a couple of days......OMG I just want to choke something.........So you can see this is why I am in such a horrific mood
Lora...I can believe this since ours left the NVC center feb 13 and I was so excited until the guy said..."yeah it left for Montreal....and I almost chocked because that is the wrong embassy for us...it was supposed to go to VanCouver.....so we are in the process of trying to locate and get it moved....I hate this for you...this whole ordeal has been just that.....an ORDEAL!!!!!!!!!! kEEP US POSTED AND WE WILL DO THE SAME!!!!!!
Oh Charlene....wow I am sorry.......I am feeling like I have a mark on my petition that says screw up as much as possible....and a sign on my back that says kick me.......We will over come this too but Gosh this is hard to endure....I saw a post by Ric....my heart just ache's for her and Virgil
Found this old post in a thread titled "1st post former NSC adjudicator now petitioner".
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Here he describes his personal process for approving petitions(it's long, but I thought it was worth posting in it's entirety for new people to read):
------------------------
posted by HUSKERKIEV, 2/21/07, http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Well lets see how much I remember...
Maybe it might be easier if I just described what I would do to approve a petition - my process.
First, I would select a case file/folder. All petitions/files are kept in folders that a have a scanable bar code identifier. This folder has everything that a person submits on the left side of the folder and all the agency generated documents on the right side. They should be in date order, Petition and then most recent from top to bottom. The left side has the pictures on top.
You begin by looking at the petition for correctness by checking the information via several databases depending upon what type of petition you are adjudicating. Also if the form was complete and everything was in order. Descrepancies in peoples names from what the database had vs. what the petition said, birth dates, things like that all had to be resolved and could generate a RFE if the adjudicator couldn't figure it out with the tools he had.
There were some standard criminal and background type databases that were required for all petitions. A "hit" in any of these databases would flag the petition and it would be sent to a special group who worked to resolve why the "hit" occurred. Sometimes it could be something simple as a similar name of a bad guy, but every hit had to be resolved.
I remember that certain surnames would invariably cause a hit, but they could be resolved rather quickly by comparing the applicants background information with those of the "hit" name. There were various ways to do this of course, and it took time. Thats why some applications take longer to process because there are stumbling blocks along the way that must be worked through before approval. Consequently, all the other petitions that the officer was working get set to the side. or, the adjudicator/officer might set the difficult one to the side and work on less complicated ones. Remember it was a production environment where you had to be accurate but fast. Getting a petition kicked back for mistakes to be re-worked hurt your overall stats, so, you tried to be a thorough as you could, but also as quick as you could.
After clearing a applicant through the various mandatory database searches, then you could begin to review the various information on the petition. Sometimes there would be stupid mistakes like forgetting to sign it, or using a copy when an original signature was required etc... Kinda careless mistakes or from not really understanding the instructions type of thing. Anyway, these would generate an RFE, and the file's staus would be update in the computer as awaiting repsonse to RFE or something like that, I don't recall the exact terminology.
Anyway, instead of sending the newly RFE'd file back to the large file storage area, it would be kept at the officers desk in a holding cue. Then when an RFE reply would come in, I wpuld pull it (the file) off the shelf and rework it. I tried to clear all my answered RFE's out first thing every morning because it was "old" work as compared to the dates I was working at the time. If the RFE had the required information, it would continue to be processed and/or approved and sent on its way. If the RFE did not address the item, then another RFE would be generated and back on the shelf it would go.
A word about RFE's. It was my experience that no two officers would always see eye to eye on if an RFE was required. Some officers could or would spend some more time digging around the file or a database to find the information (if they thought it could be found) and others would just as soon rip off an RFE. So it varied. Then there were some times that an RFE was required because of the situation. Again, it depends a lot on who was looking at your case and what the question was / what information was needed. No hard and fast rule.
Also, each adjudicator/officer had a master list of RFE "phrases that they could pull off thier computer and plug into a standard RFE form depending upon the situation. Each of these "phrases" could be further "wordsmithed" to suit a particular situation. Again depends on the officer. Thats why you may see some RFE's that are similar but not exact. We would borrow each others RFE phrases to add to our list as we came across one that fit a particular situation.
It would be like "Hey, cube mate. I've got this situation, do you have anything in your RFE library that might fit?" answer "Sure, try this one. I'll email it to you". And thats how that worked.
You asked about country of birth etc.. Yes and no. There were "watch lists" of certain countries that meant that certain procedures had to be followed when processing petitions from these countries, but it was just a couple more things to check/verify along the approval process. It didn't slow things down dramatically. So, I wouldn't worry about that being a big factor.
Additional review. Mainly if you came up as a "hit" for a surname of a bad guy (or gal) that would have to be resolved. Marriage Fraud. Overstaying your visit. Lying. Criminal activity/organized crime, police reports, things that would be outside of a "normal" person's life you might say.
So back to the approval process. So if no RFE was needed then i would "approve' the petition, affix my stamp with my identifier # , sign and date it. I would then scan the file, update the status and send it on its wayto the next stop wherever that was. Actually, all the approved petitions/files were placed in a separate box and those were collected as you went along and taken for final disposition/processing.
Then you start all over again with the next case...
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Here he describes his personal process for approving petitions(it's long, but I thought it was worth posting in it's entirety for new people to read):
------------------------
posted by HUSKERKIEV, 2/21/07, http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Well lets see how much I remember...
Maybe it might be easier if I just described what I would do to approve a petition - my process.
First, I would select a case file/folder. All petitions/files are kept in folders that a have a scanable bar code identifier. This folder has everything that a person submits on the left side of the folder and all the agency generated documents on the right side. They should be in date order, Petition and then most recent from top to bottom. The left side has the pictures on top.
You begin by looking at the petition for correctness by checking the information via several databases depending upon what type of petition you are adjudicating. Also if the form was complete and everything was in order. Descrepancies in peoples names from what the database had vs. what the petition said, birth dates, things like that all had to be resolved and could generate a RFE if the adjudicator couldn't figure it out with the tools he had.
There were some standard criminal and background type databases that were required for all petitions. A "hit" in any of these databases would flag the petition and it would be sent to a special group who worked to resolve why the "hit" occurred. Sometimes it could be something simple as a similar name of a bad guy, but every hit had to be resolved.
I remember that certain surnames would invariably cause a hit, but they could be resolved rather quickly by comparing the applicants background information with those of the "hit" name. There were various ways to do this of course, and it took time. Thats why some applications take longer to process because there are stumbling blocks along the way that must be worked through before approval. Consequently, all the other petitions that the officer was working get set to the side. or, the adjudicator/officer might set the difficult one to the side and work on less complicated ones. Remember it was a production environment where you had to be accurate but fast. Getting a petition kicked back for mistakes to be re-worked hurt your overall stats, so, you tried to be a thorough as you could, but also as quick as you could.
After clearing a applicant through the various mandatory database searches, then you could begin to review the various information on the petition. Sometimes there would be stupid mistakes like forgetting to sign it, or using a copy when an original signature was required etc... Kinda careless mistakes or from not really understanding the instructions type of thing. Anyway, these would generate an RFE, and the file's staus would be update in the computer as awaiting repsonse to RFE or something like that, I don't recall the exact terminology.
Anyway, instead of sending the newly RFE'd file back to the large file storage area, it would be kept at the officers desk in a holding cue. Then when an RFE reply would come in, I wpuld pull it (the file) off the shelf and rework it. I tried to clear all my answered RFE's out first thing every morning because it was "old" work as compared to the dates I was working at the time. If the RFE had the required information, it would continue to be processed and/or approved and sent on its way. If the RFE did not address the item, then another RFE would be generated and back on the shelf it would go.
A word about RFE's. It was my experience that no two officers would always see eye to eye on if an RFE was required. Some officers could or would spend some more time digging around the file or a database to find the information (if they thought it could be found) and others would just as soon rip off an RFE. So it varied. Then there were some times that an RFE was required because of the situation. Again, it depends a lot on who was looking at your case and what the question was / what information was needed. No hard and fast rule.
Also, each adjudicator/officer had a master list of RFE "phrases that they could pull off thier computer and plug into a standard RFE form depending upon the situation. Each of these "phrases" could be further "wordsmithed" to suit a particular situation. Again depends on the officer. Thats why you may see some RFE's that are similar but not exact. We would borrow each others RFE phrases to add to our list as we came across one that fit a particular situation.
It would be like "Hey, cube mate. I've got this situation, do you have anything in your RFE library that might fit?" answer "Sure, try this one. I'll email it to you". And thats how that worked.
You asked about country of birth etc.. Yes and no. There were "watch lists" of certain countries that meant that certain procedures had to be followed when processing petitions from these countries, but it was just a couple more things to check/verify along the approval process. It didn't slow things down dramatically. So, I wouldn't worry about that being a big factor.
Additional review. Mainly if you came up as a "hit" for a surname of a bad guy (or gal) that would have to be resolved. Marriage Fraud. Overstaying your visit. Lying. Criminal activity/organized crime, police reports, things that would be outside of a "normal" person's life you might say.
So back to the approval process. So if no RFE was needed then i would "approve' the petition, affix my stamp with my identifier # , sign and date it. I would then scan the file, update the status and send it on its wayto the next stop wherever that was. Actually, all the approved petitions/files were placed in a separate box and those were collected as you went along and taken for final disposition/processing.
Then you start all over again with the next case...
Just read something else he posted in that thread, about how much time they spent on each petition (or as he called them, "hunny-bunnies" LOL!!):
Before I answer your question, I need to say this because I haven't said it already and I wouldn't want to mislead people. I worked other petitions besides the I-129's or (hunny-bunnies as they were affectionately referred to). But the process is the same, same databases, same checks etc... Everything in the system works the same as far as the processes and the flow of work. If you walked through the NSC it's a maze of cubes and everyone has the same type stuff in thier cubes, the same file folders etc.... It's just whats inside the folders that's different.
But everything is scanned and routed around the various Service Centers the same. So, Nebraska does itthe same way Vermont does or California or wherever. I can't speak to the District Offices or the Consulates. They may have thier own way of doing things, but as an organization/agency there were standard operating procedures for handling and processing cases. We all use basically the same "system" and "tools".
That having been said... I could crank out an "approval" in about 15 minutes depending upon the complexity of the petition. I recall that we'd love to see those large family petitions with the little kids. Why? Because once you clear the mom and dad, the kids went really fast and you could get several "credits" very quickly that way instead of having to do the equal number of "individual" petitions for the same amount of "credits". But you have to be fast and thorough, because its your job to be fast and thorough you might say...
Before I answer your question, I need to say this because I haven't said it already and I wouldn't want to mislead people. I worked other petitions besides the I-129's or (hunny-bunnies as they were affectionately referred to). But the process is the same, same databases, same checks etc... Everything in the system works the same as far as the processes and the flow of work. If you walked through the NSC it's a maze of cubes and everyone has the same type stuff in thier cubes, the same file folders etc.... It's just whats inside the folders that's different.
But everything is scanned and routed around the various Service Centers the same. So, Nebraska does itthe same way Vermont does or California or wherever. I can't speak to the District Offices or the Consulates. They may have thier own way of doing things, but as an organization/agency there were standard operating procedures for handling and processing cases. We all use basically the same "system" and "tools".
That having been said... I could crank out an "approval" in about 15 minutes depending upon the complexity of the petition. I recall that we'd love to see those large family petitions with the little kids. Why? Because once you clear the mom and dad, the kids went really fast and you could get several "credits" very quickly that way instead of having to do the equal number of "individual" petitions for the same amount of "credits". But you have to be fast and thorough, because its your job to be fast and thorough you might say...
Even more goodness...
Thanks. There are storage shelves in each section of the building that house the boxes full of applicants files. These shelves are continuosly replenished as boxes are removed by the officers to be worked or turned in to be further processed after being approved. This resupply as it were is handled by the CIS contract employees.
So as a Adjudicator/officer I would go and get a box of case files every morning, scan/wand each file into the sytem under my user ID # (so people could track who had it) and then begin to adjudicate the cases. A box might hold 50 case or so.
They also had a rack for "expedites" which were cases whose petitioners had selected/paid for "premium processing". You were slected on a rotating bais to do "expedites". But the process was the same for these they just were staged diferently in the overall que of things, so to speak. MOved further ahead in line or something. Congressionals were pulled by the congressional office and routed to the appropriate supervisor for dissemination to his employee's to work with a short turn around time.
So, your number of files vary at any given time during the day. Officers who did the work form home I spoek about earlier would come in to the office maybe once or twice a week, scan in all thier new files (to their ID), then scan in all the approved files they were returning back into the system (from thier ID) and take the multiple boxes back home with them to work. Enough to last a few days or so.
The reason for some hanging so long could be several. One could be an RFE and while the officer is waiting for the response he is working more current dates. In other words more and more applications are getting in front of the RFE'd application. Another reason could be that the boxes that are staged on the shelves are chosen at random by the officers. For some reason a box of files might sit longer on the shelf than another. Usually not more than a day at the most though. Or the officer could be hording a box at his desk (for some strange reason) and then goes on vacation and deoesn't scan them out of his name and back into (return) them to the system so they can be picked up by someone else to work. So it sits for awhile.
Usually unless a file gets misplaced, applications are always kept in date groupings and date order. If you look in a box of files, they will all have been initially entered into the system either on the same day or within a day. That way they can work from oldest to newest in a organized fashion. They are kept that way so it will be fair to everyone waiting in line for approval.
On the rare occurance a file will be mistakenly sent to district office or other Service Center, the error will be caught when a file search is done and it shows the location of the file (there is a system code showing its physical location). The the file is recalled to its proper center or office. Very rare though.
Thanks. There are storage shelves in each section of the building that house the boxes full of applicants files. These shelves are continuosly replenished as boxes are removed by the officers to be worked or turned in to be further processed after being approved. This resupply as it were is handled by the CIS contract employees.
So as a Adjudicator/officer I would go and get a box of case files every morning, scan/wand each file into the sytem under my user ID # (so people could track who had it) and then begin to adjudicate the cases. A box might hold 50 case or so.
They also had a rack for "expedites" which were cases whose petitioners had selected/paid for "premium processing". You were slected on a rotating bais to do "expedites". But the process was the same for these they just were staged diferently in the overall que of things, so to speak. MOved further ahead in line or something. Congressionals were pulled by the congressional office and routed to the appropriate supervisor for dissemination to his employee's to work with a short turn around time.
So, your number of files vary at any given time during the day. Officers who did the work form home I spoek about earlier would come in to the office maybe once or twice a week, scan in all thier new files (to their ID), then scan in all the approved files they were returning back into the system (from thier ID) and take the multiple boxes back home with them to work. Enough to last a few days or so.
The reason for some hanging so long could be several. One could be an RFE and while the officer is waiting for the response he is working more current dates. In other words more and more applications are getting in front of the RFE'd application. Another reason could be that the boxes that are staged on the shelves are chosen at random by the officers. For some reason a box of files might sit longer on the shelf than another. Usually not more than a day at the most though. Or the officer could be hording a box at his desk (for some strange reason) and then goes on vacation and deoesn't scan them out of his name and back into (return) them to the system so they can be picked up by someone else to work. So it sits for awhile.
Usually unless a file gets misplaced, applications are always kept in date groupings and date order. If you look in a box of files, they will all have been initially entered into the system either on the same day or within a day. That way they can work from oldest to newest in a organized fashion. They are kept that way so it will be fair to everyone waiting in line for approval.
On the rare occurance a file will be mistakenly sent to district office or other Service Center, the error will be caught when a file search is done and it shows the location of the file (there is a system code showing its physical location). The the file is recalled to its proper center or office. Very rare though.
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 19 2008, 01:52 PM)
Well Kim thanks for asking.....A funny thing happened on the way to the embassy........they sent only half of the info.........and instead of sending the other half down they had to send the other half up to be reassembled and send it back.......I guess that is why I have NO warm fuzzies or good feelings these days......The embassy in Lima has been great but they told me they could not accept an incomplete or 1/2 of a packet.......Luckily they called NVC and it was located quickily but it is yet another delay in this process from hell......It still has not left NVC for the second time.....I can not get an explaination as to why but it is still sitting.....at least complete now......in New Hampshire I hope not gathering dust again.......I call every day and they are all so nice but it is just a kinder version of USCIS to me at this point.....No info....no reason.....just check back in a couple of days......OMG I just want to choke something.........So you can see this is why I am in such a horrific mood
QUOTE(charlene @ Feb 19 2008, 01:57 PM)
Lora...I can believe this since ours left the NVC center feb 13 and I was so excited until the guy said..."yeah it left for Montreal....and I almost chocked because that is the wrong embassy for us...it was supposed to go to VanCouver.....so we are in the process of trying to locate and get it moved....I hate this for you...this whole ordeal has been just that.....an ORDEAL!!!!!!!!!! kEEP US POSTED AND WE WILL DO THE SAME!!!!!!
This is just simply unbelievable! I do not think I have ever seen such a group of incompetent fools as these clowns at USCIS and NVC.
QUOTE(psiprez @ Feb 19 2008, 02:57 PM)
Found this old post in a thread titled "1st post former NSC adjudicator now petitioner".
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Would that be the same huskerkiev thread that I have had linked in my signature for 6 months?
Actually I am glad you brought it to people's attention again. That thread should be required reading for everyone.
QUOTE(Bill y Bella @ Feb 19 2008, 04:43 PM)
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 19 2008, 01:52 PM)
Well Kim thanks for asking.....A funny thing happened on the way to the embassy........they sent only half of the info.........and instead of sending the other half down they had to send the other half up to be reassembled and send it back.......I guess that is why I have NO warm fuzzies or good feelings these days......The embassy in Lima has been great but they told me they could not accept an incomplete or 1/2 of a packet.......Luckily they called NVC and it was located quickily but it is yet another delay in this process from hell......It still has not left NVC for the second time.....I can not get an explaination as to why but it is still sitting.....at least complete now......in New Hampshire I hope not gathering dust again.......I call every day and they are all so nice but it is just a kinder version of USCIS to me at this point.....No info....no reason.....just check back in a couple of days......OMG I just want to choke something.........So you can see this is why I am in such a horrific mood
QUOTE(charlene @ Feb 19 2008, 01:57 PM)
Lora...I can believe this since ours left the NVC center feb 13 and I was so excited until the guy said..."yeah it left for Montreal....and I almost chocked because that is the wrong embassy for us...it was supposed to go to VanCouver.....so we are in the process of trying to locate and get it moved....I hate this for you...this whole ordeal has been just that.....an ORDEAL!!!!!!!!!! kEEP US POSTED AND WE WILL DO THE SAME!!!!!!
This is just simply unbelievable! I do not think I have ever seen such a group of incompetent fools as these clowns at USCIS and NVC.
I had thought we had made it when we got out of the hell hole called VSC but I was wrong we just dropped into another hell hole called NVC......Can we please just get to Lima in one piece and let Oscar and I get on with our lives........PLEASE.......
On the 26th it will be 9 months of this bullsh*t........I am beyond frustrated...I am furious.....Lora
QUOTE(Bill y Bella @ Feb 19 2008, 04:48 PM)
QUOTE(psiprez @ Feb 19 2008, 02:57 PM)
Found this old post in a thread titled "1st post former NSC adjudicator now petitioner".
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
OP was a Applications Adjudicator at NSC (Nebraska) back in 2003.
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=55762&st=0
Would that be the same huskerkiev thread that I have had linked in my signature for 6 months?
Actually I am glad you brought it to people's attention again. That thread should be required reading for everyone.
I want you to know I saw that thread way back in September in your signature and read through the entire thing. Even went back looking for posts from you several times to find the link again. Finally I saved a link to my desktop and have shared it with loads of people so THANK YOU!
Lora!!! 
Oh sweetie, I am so sorry for your frustrations! WTF is wrong with these people?! 
I know my ranting will do you no good so just know that their are others out here routing for you! It will happen ...and when it does your LOVE is the only thing that will matter. ::hugs::
Charlene, sorry to hear you are having problems too. My best to you as well.
Oh sweetie, I am so sorry for your frustrations! WTF is wrong with these people?! I know my ranting will do you no good so just know that their are others out here routing for you! It will happen ...and when it does your LOVE is the only thing that will matter. ::hugs::Charlene, sorry to hear you are having problems too. My best to you as well.
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
congrats!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
WOO HOO!!!
Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
Its about dang time!!!
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!
I am so very happy for you ric!!!!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
wowowowowow i just looked at your timeline....that is outrageous.
congratulations!!!!!!
about freakin time!!!
ps - i like your sig cartoon
congrats!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
Congratulations!!!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
Congratulations!
The fact that you had to wait so long is outrageous but at last you can move to the next step. I wish you the best of luck on the rest of your journey.
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 21 2008, 01:48 AM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
CONGRATS!!!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
YEAH YEAH YEAH.....FINALLY FINALLy......THIS IS GREAT.......CONGRATS RIC
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 20 2008, 01:49 PM)
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
YEAH YEAH YEAH.....FINALLY FINALLy......THIS IS GREAT.......CONGRATS RIC
Oh wait.....
I have to do the approval dance
O.K. VSC......VIRGILS TURN
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
Sweet Jesus, finally!!! I'm very happy for you,CONGRATULATIONS!!!
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 20 2008, 01:50 PM)
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
YEAH YEAH YEAH.....FINALLY FINALLy......THIS IS GREAT.......CONGRATS RIC
QUOTE(OsLoraTamm @ Feb 20 2008, 01:49 PM)
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
YEAH YEAH YEAH.....FINALLY FINALLy......THIS IS GREAT.......CONGRATS RIC
Oh wait.....
I have to do the approval dance
O.K. VSC......VIRGILS TURN
It absolutely is! I haven't seen him around. I'm hoping he's already approved.
QUOTE(dbears @ Feb 20 2008, 01:44 PM)
I just love your little emote!!
Sadly, I'm not clever enough to figure out how to use ones outside of VJ's limited and pathetic selection. 
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 05:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
What??!!
Woooo-hooo!!!!!!!
Congratulations! It's about time!
Good luck,
hz
SOOOO SWEEEETTTT!!!
It's about freakin time!!! I hope the rest of the process is over in the blink of an eye for you! You deserve it!
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 12:48 PM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
Finally! Congratulations Ric!! Wonderful news after such a long wait. Very cool.
QUOTE(ric @ Feb 20 2008, 11:48 AM)
OMG YOU GUYS!!
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
I GOT APPROVED TODAY!
FINALLY!
*huge sigh of relief*
Thats the best news ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Enjoy this moment!!!!!!!!!!
Just to let everyone know......I called the NVC about them sending our packet to the wrong embassy....ad they said that
they would try to catch it before they started processing it.......to call back in 10-15 days......
Other wise they couldn't tell me anything about what would happen if they didn't catch it????????
[color="#FF0000"]I give up!!!!!!!
this goes from dumb to dumber to idiotic!!!!!!!!!!!!!![color="#9932CC"]
they would try to catch it before they started processing it.......to call back in 10-15 days......
Other wise they couldn't tell me anything about what would happen if they didn't catch it????????
[color="#FF0000"]I give up!!!!!!!
this goes from dumb to dumber to idiotic!!!!!!!!!!!!!![color="#9932CC"]
QUOTE(charlene @ Feb 20 2008, 04:43 PM)
Just to let everyone know......I called the NVC about them sending our packet to the wrong embassy....ad they said that
they would try to catch it before they started processing it.......to call back in 10-15 days......
Other wise they couldn't tell me anything about what would happen if they didn't catch it????????
[color="#FF0000"]I give up!!!!!!!
this goes from dumb to dumber to idiotic!!!!!!!!!!!!!![color="#9932CC"]
they would try to catch it before they started processing it.......to call back in 10-15 days......
Other wise they couldn't tell me anything about what would happen if they didn't catch it????????
[color="#FF0000"]I give up!!!!!!!
this goes from dumb to dumber to idiotic!!!!!!!!!!!!!![color="#9932CC"]
Um, I bet their answer will be he should move to Montreal
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
QUOTE(virgillionaire @ Feb 20 2008, 10:35 PM)
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
YEAH YEAH YEAH.....Oh Virgil.........I am so very happy for you....thank God
I think the Trunk Monkey had it....hahahahahahahaha
Congrats
Virgillionaire and Ric, congrats to you both, this is truely great news!!!!!
QUOTE(virgillionaire @ Feb 20 2008, 10:35 PM)
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
Wow! Congratulations!
I would love to hear their explanantion as to why it took so long but I think that is one mystery that will never be solved. Best of luck on the rest of your journey!
Wow!! Finally Virgil. Congratulations! Poor Charlene just HAS to be getting some good news soon. This is just wrong.... hang in there. Don't ever give up.
Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QUOTE(virgillionaire @ Feb 21 2008, 11:35 AM)
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
QUOTE(virgillionaire @ Feb 20 2008, 10:35 PM)
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
Congratulations to you and Ana.
Hopefully the rest of the journey will be much quicker. Here is a possible list that might make Letterman's top ten list.
Where was Virgil's petition at for 8 months?
10. Was received but was used as winter insulation in their walls.
9. The weight of all the July filer petitions caused a floor to collapse mixing all the files.
8. Was taken home to be worked on, but person went into a coma. Just now recovered.
7. Put in a locked desk but , Curley, Larry and Moe forgot the combination.
6. New hire was given file but was later deported.
5. Used as a cushion for taking naps between approvals and became a favorite for all to use.
4. Was in adjucater suitcase on Southwest flight and became lost luggage. Note, luggage was finally found but not adjucater.
3. Janitor was using it as a step latter.
2 The gang at VSC finally sobered up from New Years and realized June does in fact comes before November.
1. New England fan was working it and paying more attention to them until Patriots got beat.
QUOTE(virgillionaire @ Feb 20 2008, 10:35 PM)
I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!! I'M FINALLY FREAKIN APPROVED!!!!!!!
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
Hey Erica Congrats to you too and the same day!!! Aren't you dying to know where they found our petitions? Maybe in the corner of a car trunk of one of those work from home adjudicators??!!
Ahhhh, free from vsc, what a feeling
Thanks! I'm still feeling so much lighter now that this is done. I'm sure you are too. I'm so pleased they approved you too. I was hoping for it.
freedom, Virgil. FREEDOM.
Feels good, doesnt it?
WOW!! Congrats to Virgillionaire and Ric!
(I'm late to the party, my laptop decided to die.)
And Charlene... ohh I'm so sorry. That is INSANE!
(I'm late to the party, my laptop decided to die.)
And Charlene... ohh I'm so sorry.
That is INSANE!
LOVE to see those early months shrink...
CODE
Pending VSC K1 Applications
From: 4/30/2007 To: 2/21/2008 2:41 AM CST
# Name I-129F Date Sent Days Since Last Seen (if older)
1 Elena & David 05-11-2007 0
2 Lalina & Ramesh 05-14-2007 (Has RFE)
3 Ekaterina & Alex 05-24-2007 14
May has 3 of 66 pending (95.5% complete), with 3 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
4 GA & ER 06-01-2007 0
5 Selena & sterling 06-01-2007 21
6 Ana & Virgil 06-04-2007 1
7 Harlene & Glenn 06-04-2007
8 Adam & Carrie 06-05-2007 0
9 Hanako & Andrew 06-08-2007 8
10 I & W 06-26-2007 1
11 wala & jayel 06-28-2007 30
June has 8 of 76 pending (89.5% complete), with 2 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
12 Sunflower & Rino 07-01-2007 11
13 maryna & matt 07-17-2007 1
14 Lusi & Gabriel 07-19-2007
15 Marvin & Tonza 07-19-2007 0
16 Matthew & Marisa 07-20-2007 1
17 David M Corrigan & Rebecca J Perfetti 07-23-2007
18 Abdelmounim & Donna 07-24-2007 17
19 Carmen & Bert 07-27-2007 33
20 Nohemi & Jorge 07-28-2007 (Has RFE) 11
July has 9 of 130 pending (93.1% complete), with 7 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 11 inactive profiles.
21 Shobana & Sunil 08-15-2007
22 Arlene & Steve 08-17-2007 0
23 Kheng & Ken 08-20-2007
24 anca & val 08-24-2007
25 Loshiel & Kenneth C. Bose 08-25-2007 (Has RFE) 1
26 Supanna & Wasan 08-27-2007 0
August has 6 of 38 pending (84.2% complete), with 2 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 3 inactive profiles.
27 shea & all 09-01-2007 1
28 Jo & David 09-09-2007 0
29 Sharda & Neil 09-10-2007 0
30 Anil & Cindy 09-14-2007 (Has RFE) 1
31 Rebecca & Dominick 09-25-2007 3
32 Elnara & Mike 09-29-2007 23
September has 6 of 61 pending (90.2% complete), with 10 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 1 inactive profiles.
33 Guiying Liu & Alvin Michael Smith 10-01-2007
34 Lola L. & Alvin E.B. 10-03-2007 2
35 Nomie & stuart 10-05-2007 0
36 Eliane & Daniel 10-09-2007 (Has RFE) 9
37 Emma & Sammy 10-15-2007 0
38 Hau & Keith 10-15-2007 2
39 Mary & Dan 10-15-2007 1
40 Victoria & Ryan 10-16-2007
41 Doina & John 10-17-2007 (Has RFE) 1
42 Alena & Harry 10-19-2007 (Has RFE) 1
43 parveen & ayan 10-19-2007
44 cheryl & lee 10-22-2007 0
45 Jane & Paul 10-22-2007 47
46 Campbell & Halle 10-23-2007 1
47 Gus & Tasha 10-26-2007 2
48 Graeme & Megan 10-27-2007 1
49 Mabel & Carlos 10-29-2007 1
50 Adriana & Rex 10-30-2007 0
51 Sandra & Greg 10-30-2007 1
52 Joanna & Stephen 10-31-2007 0
October has 20 of 81 pending (75.3% complete), with 39 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
53 Rupa & LT 11-01-2007 0
54 Sasha & Eriq 11-01-2007
55 Toni & Matt 11-01-2007
56 Chahid & Stacy 11-03-2007 34
57 Yulia & Dennis 11-06-2007 1
58 Cathy & Glenn 11-09-2007 9
59 Lee & Sebastian 11-10-2007 1
60 Maria Ni�a & Robert 11-10-2007 1
61 Eunice & Wesley 11-16-2007 (Has RFE) 1
62 John & Pamela 11-16-2007 1
63 Nina & Scott 11-16-2007 4
64 Nicoleta & Shawn 11-19-2007 1
65 Olesya & Igor 11-19-2007 2
66 N B & A S 11-21-2007 1
67 Yui & Tj 11-22-2007 37
68 Tatyana & Tom 11-23-2007 1
69 Tatiana & Tom 11-26-2007
70 Jackson & Melissa 11-27-2007
71 Daniel & Andrea 11-28-2007
72 Elena & Mike 11-30-2007
73 leona & will 11-30-2007 (Has RFE)
74 Yazmin & Kevin 11-30-2007
November has 22 of 51 pending (56.9% complete), with 25 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 3 inactive profiles.
75 Damar & Douglas 12-01-2007
76 Dayfenix & Eric 12-01-2007
77 Graeme & Jen 12-03-2007
78 Shae Apland & Marissa Famiglietti 12-04-2007
79 Thunchanok & Robert 12-04-2007
80 Yanilda & Donald 12-04-2007
81 Benni & Patti 12-05-2007
82 Laura & Nicholas 12-05-2007
83 Stephanie & Stephen 12-07-2007
84 Jamaica Eva Ragas & Timothy Dulin 12-10-2007
85 David & Ina 12-11-2007
86 Hiu Ha Chan & Tanffy Chan 12-12-2007
87 sweet_face & pooh_bear 12-12-2007
88 Gem & Frank 12-13-2007
89 Habibi & Habiba 12-13-2007
90 Andrew & Lyra 12-14-2007
91 Barbara & Jack 12-14-2007
92 Lu & Tom 12-18-2007
93 Melissa & Brian 12-18-2007
94 Helena & Paul 12-19-2007
95 Simon & Amy 12-19-2007
96 David & Shannon 12-20-2007
97 Thuy & Thuan 12-20-2007
98 Lori & Eric 12-21-2007
99 Suchada & Alvin 12-26-2007
100 alena & tj 12-27-2007
101 Amin & Hibat 12-27-2007
102 dawn & marvin 12-27-2007
103 Shiyang & Anthony 12-27-2007
104 Erika & Justin 12-28-2007
105 Amy & David 12-29-2007
106 maribeth & randy 12-29-2007
December has 32 of 42 pending (23.8% complete), with 9 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
107 E & L 01-01-2008
108 Olga & Gene 01-02-2008
109 Paul & Susan 01-03-2008
110 jomylyn & michael 01-04-2008
111 Marco & Nicole 01-04-2008
112 Mina & Fred 01-04-2008
113 Santos & Donna 01-04-2008
114 Gosia & Brian 01-05-2008
115 L & T 01-07-2008
116 Lilliput/Rosehall & Trelawny 01-07-2008
117 Lucia & Tom 01-07-2008
118 Azzeddine & Kathleen 01-08-2008
119 Alba Lucia Perez Vasquez & James Claydon 01-09-2008
120 Gerry & Karen 01-10-2008
121 Steve & Patti 01-10-2008
122 Louis & Catherine 01-11-2008
123 Mauricio & Stephanie 01-11-2008
124 Femi & Noel 01-12-2008
125 Ksusha & Pasha 01-12-2008
126 Priscilla & Eric 01-12-2008
127 TL & LN 01-12-2008
128 Justyna & Dominik 01-14-2008
129 Liam & Samantha 01-14-2008
130 SS & PS 01-14-2008
131 Gamal & Erin 01-16-2008
132 Miriam & Simon 01-16-2008
133 Ria & Stephen 01-16-2008
134 Tim & Schmissa 01-16-2008
135 Alejandro & Wanda 01-17-2008
136 Juliana & Andre 01-17-2008
137 Rich & Nicole 01-17-2008
138 Iain & Kati 01-18-2008
139 Irina & Vu 01-18-2008
140 Bella & Joe 01-19-2008
141 Jennifer & Steven 01-19-2008
142 Rhoge & Frank 01-22-2008
143 Rod & Jenni 01-22-2008
144 Trang & Bill 01-23-2008
145 nkem & obim 01-24-2008
146 G & J 01-25-2008
147 Geoff & April 01-25-2008
148 Darren & Dawn 01-28-2008
149 Kim & Emily 01-29-2008
150 Sally & Jay 01-31-2008
151 Stephen & Amanda 01-31-2008
January has 45 of 48 pending (6.3% complete), with 0 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
152 David & Anna 02-01-2008
153 Kevin & Jenn 02-01-2008
154 Steff & Sib 02-01-2008
155 Veronika & Igor 02-05-2008
156 Dan & Emily 02-06-2008
157 Gabina & Scott 02-09-2008
158 Everline & Ethan 02-11-2008
159 Maricar & Andy 02-11-2008
160 Piyanet & Dan 02-11-2008
161 Zenaida & Dennis 02-11-2008
February has 10 of 10 pending (0% complete), with 0 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
There are 161 pending of 621 applications (74.07% complete). 13 duplicates and 25 INACTIVE profiles ignored.
Profiles are considered inactive if the I-129F sent date is at least 90 days old, and the user's last seen time is 60 days ago or more.
NOA2s issued in the last 30 days:
Feb 21: 0
Feb 20: 2 (2 from Jun)
Feb 19: 7 (1 from Oct, 1 from Nov, 5 from Dec)
Feb 18: 0
Feb 17: 2 (1 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 16: 0
Feb 15: 2 (1 from Oct, 1 from Dec)
Feb 14: 7 (4 from Oct, 2 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 13: 4 (1 from Oct, 3 from Nov)
Feb 12: 7 (1 from Jul, 4 from Oct, 2 from Nov)
Feb 11: 2 (1 from May, 1 from Nov)
Feb 10: 2 (1 from Oct, 1 from Nov)
Feb 09: 0
Feb 08: 4 (1 from Oct, 3 from Nov)
Feb 07: 5 (1 from May, 4 from Nov)
Feb 06: 9 (1 from Jul, 1 from Sep, 2 from Oct, 5 from Nov)
Feb 05: 2 (1 from Jul, 1 from Nov)
Feb 04: 5 (3 from Oct, 1 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 03: 0
Feb 02: 0
Feb 01: 4 (1 from May, 3 from Oct)
Jan 31: 6 (3 from Sep, 3 from Oct)
Jan 30: 2 (2 from Oct)
Jan 29: 5 (5 from Oct)
Jan 28: 5 (1 from Sep, 4 from Oct)
Jan 27: 0
Jan 26: 0
Jan 25: 4 (1 from Jul, 2 from Sep, 1 from Oct)
Jan 24: 7 (2 from Aug, 3 from Sep, 2 from Oct)
Jan 23: 4 (3 from Jul, 1 from Oct)
97 total NOA2s in the last 30 days.
From: 4/30/2007 To: 2/21/2008 2:41 AM CST
# Name I-129F Date Sent Days Since Last Seen (if older)
1 Elena & David 05-11-2007 0
2 Lalina & Ramesh 05-14-2007 (Has RFE)
3 Ekaterina & Alex 05-24-2007 14
May has 3 of 66 pending (95.5% complete), with 3 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
4 GA & ER 06-01-2007 0
5 Selena & sterling 06-01-2007 21
6 Ana & Virgil 06-04-2007 1
7 Harlene & Glenn 06-04-2007
8 Adam & Carrie 06-05-2007 0
9 Hanako & Andrew 06-08-2007 8
10 I & W 06-26-2007 1
11 wala & jayel 06-28-2007 30
June has 8 of 76 pending (89.5% complete), with 2 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
12 Sunflower & Rino 07-01-2007 11
13 maryna & matt 07-17-2007 1
14 Lusi & Gabriel 07-19-2007
15 Marvin & Tonza 07-19-2007 0
16 Matthew & Marisa 07-20-2007 1
17 David M Corrigan & Rebecca J Perfetti 07-23-2007
18 Abdelmounim & Donna 07-24-2007 17
19 Carmen & Bert 07-27-2007 33
20 Nohemi & Jorge 07-28-2007 (Has RFE) 11
July has 9 of 130 pending (93.1% complete), with 7 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 11 inactive profiles.
21 Shobana & Sunil 08-15-2007
22 Arlene & Steve 08-17-2007 0
23 Kheng & Ken 08-20-2007
24 anca & val 08-24-2007
25 Loshiel & Kenneth C. Bose 08-25-2007 (Has RFE) 1
26 Supanna & Wasan 08-27-2007 0
August has 6 of 38 pending (84.2% complete), with 2 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 3 inactive profiles.
27 shea & all 09-01-2007 1
28 Jo & David 09-09-2007 0
29 Sharda & Neil 09-10-2007 0
30 Anil & Cindy 09-14-2007 (Has RFE) 1
31 Rebecca & Dominick 09-25-2007 3
32 Elnara & Mike 09-29-2007 23
September has 6 of 61 pending (90.2% complete), with 10 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 1 inactive profiles.
33 Guiying Liu & Alvin Michael Smith 10-01-2007
34 Lola L. & Alvin E.B. 10-03-2007 2
35 Nomie & stuart 10-05-2007 0
36 Eliane & Daniel 10-09-2007 (Has RFE) 9
37 Emma & Sammy 10-15-2007 0
38 Hau & Keith 10-15-2007 2
39 Mary & Dan 10-15-2007 1
40 Victoria & Ryan 10-16-2007
41 Doina & John 10-17-2007 (Has RFE) 1
42 Alena & Harry 10-19-2007 (Has RFE) 1
43 parveen & ayan 10-19-2007
44 cheryl & lee 10-22-2007 0
45 Jane & Paul 10-22-2007 47
46 Campbell & Halle 10-23-2007 1
47 Gus & Tasha 10-26-2007 2
48 Graeme & Megan 10-27-2007 1
49 Mabel & Carlos 10-29-2007 1
50 Adriana & Rex 10-30-2007 0
51 Sandra & Greg 10-30-2007 1
52 Joanna & Stephen 10-31-2007 0
October has 20 of 81 pending (75.3% complete), with 39 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 2 inactive profiles.
53 Rupa & LT 11-01-2007 0
54 Sasha & Eriq 11-01-2007
55 Toni & Matt 11-01-2007
56 Chahid & Stacy 11-03-2007 34
57 Yulia & Dennis 11-06-2007 1
58 Cathy & Glenn 11-09-2007 9
59 Lee & Sebastian 11-10-2007 1
60 Maria Ni�a & Robert 11-10-2007 1
61 Eunice & Wesley 11-16-2007 (Has RFE) 1
62 John & Pamela 11-16-2007 1
63 Nina & Scott 11-16-2007 4
64 Nicoleta & Shawn 11-19-2007 1
65 Olesya & Igor 11-19-2007 2
66 N B & A S 11-21-2007 1
67 Yui & Tj 11-22-2007 37
68 Tatyana & Tom 11-23-2007 1
69 Tatiana & Tom 11-26-2007
70 Jackson & Melissa 11-27-2007
71 Daniel & Andrea 11-28-2007
72 Elena & Mike 11-30-2007
73 leona & will 11-30-2007 (Has RFE)
74 Yazmin & Kevin 11-30-2007
November has 22 of 51 pending (56.9% complete), with 25 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 3 inactive profiles.
75 Damar & Douglas 12-01-2007
76 Dayfenix & Eric 12-01-2007
77 Graeme & Jen 12-03-2007
78 Shae Apland & Marissa Famiglietti 12-04-2007
79 Thunchanok & Robert 12-04-2007
80 Yanilda & Donald 12-04-2007
81 Benni & Patti 12-05-2007
82 Laura & Nicholas 12-05-2007
83 Stephanie & Stephen 12-07-2007
84 Jamaica Eva Ragas & Timothy Dulin 12-10-2007
85 David & Ina 12-11-2007
86 Hiu Ha Chan & Tanffy Chan 12-12-2007
87 sweet_face & pooh_bear 12-12-2007
88 Gem & Frank 12-13-2007
89 Habibi & Habiba 12-13-2007
90 Andrew & Lyra 12-14-2007
91 Barbara & Jack 12-14-2007
92 Lu & Tom 12-18-2007
93 Melissa & Brian 12-18-2007
94 Helena & Paul 12-19-2007
95 Simon & Amy 12-19-2007
96 David & Shannon 12-20-2007
97 Thuy & Thuan 12-20-2007
98 Lori & Eric 12-21-2007
99 Suchada & Alvin 12-26-2007
100 alena & tj 12-27-2007
101 Amin & Hibat 12-27-2007
102 dawn & marvin 12-27-2007
103 Shiyang & Anthony 12-27-2007
104 Erika & Justin 12-28-2007
105 Amy & David 12-29-2007
106 maribeth & randy 12-29-2007
December has 32 of 42 pending (23.8% complete), with 9 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
107 E & L 01-01-2008
108 Olga & Gene 01-02-2008
109 Paul & Susan 01-03-2008
110 jomylyn & michael 01-04-2008
111 Marco & Nicole 01-04-2008
112 Mina & Fred 01-04-2008
113 Santos & Donna 01-04-2008
114 Gosia & Brian 01-05-2008
115 L & T 01-07-2008
116 Lilliput/Rosehall & Trelawny 01-07-2008
117 Lucia & Tom 01-07-2008
118 Azzeddine & Kathleen 01-08-2008
119 Alba Lucia Perez Vasquez & James Claydon 01-09-2008
120 Gerry & Karen 01-10-2008
121 Steve & Patti 01-10-2008
122 Louis & Catherine 01-11-2008
123 Mauricio & Stephanie 01-11-2008
124 Femi & Noel 01-12-2008
125 Ksusha & Pasha 01-12-2008
126 Priscilla & Eric 01-12-2008
127 TL & LN 01-12-2008
128 Justyna & Dominik 01-14-2008
129 Liam & Samantha 01-14-2008
130 SS & PS 01-14-2008
131 Gamal & Erin 01-16-2008
132 Miriam & Simon 01-16-2008
133 Ria & Stephen 01-16-2008
134 Tim & Schmissa 01-16-2008
135 Alejandro & Wanda 01-17-2008
136 Juliana & Andre 01-17-2008
137 Rich & Nicole 01-17-2008
138 Iain & Kati 01-18-2008
139 Irina & Vu 01-18-2008
140 Bella & Joe 01-19-2008
141 Jennifer & Steven 01-19-2008
142 Rhoge & Frank 01-22-2008
143 Rod & Jenni 01-22-2008
144 Trang & Bill 01-23-2008
145 nkem & obim 01-24-2008
146 G & J 01-25-2008
147 Geoff & April 01-25-2008
148 Darren & Dawn 01-28-2008
149 Kim & Emily 01-29-2008
150 Sally & Jay 01-31-2008
151 Stephen & Amanda 01-31-2008
January has 45 of 48 pending (6.3% complete), with 0 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
152 David & Anna 02-01-2008
153 Kevin & Jenn 02-01-2008
154 Steff & Sib 02-01-2008
155 Veronika & Igor 02-05-2008
156 Dan & Emily 02-06-2008
157 Gabina & Scott 02-09-2008
158 Everline & Ethan 02-11-2008
159 Maricar & Andy 02-11-2008
160 Piyanet & Dan 02-11-2008
161 Zenaida & Dennis 02-11-2008
February has 10 of 10 pending (0% complete), with 0 NOA2s in the last 30 days, and 0 inactive profiles.
There are 161 pending of 621 applications (74.07% complete). 13 duplicates and 25 INACTIVE profiles ignored.
Profiles are considered inactive if the I-129F sent date is at least 90 days old, and the user's last seen time is 60 days ago or more.
NOA2s issued in the last 30 days:
Feb 21: 0
Feb 20: 2 (2 from Jun)
Feb 19: 7 (1 from Oct, 1 from Nov, 5 from Dec)
Feb 18: 0
Feb 17: 2 (1 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 16: 0
Feb 15: 2 (1 from Oct, 1 from Dec)
Feb 14: 7 (4 from Oct, 2 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 13: 4 (1 from Oct, 3 from Nov)
Feb 12: 7 (1 from Jul, 4 from Oct, 2 from Nov)
Feb 11: 2 (1 from May, 1 from Nov)
Feb 10: 2 (1 from Oct, 1 from Nov)
Feb 09: 0
Feb 08: 4 (1 from Oct, 3 from Nov)
Feb 07: 5 (1 from May, 4 from Nov)
Feb 06: 9 (1 from Jul, 1 from Sep, 2 from Oct, 5 from Nov)
Feb 05: 2 (1 from Jul, 1 from Nov)
Feb 04: 5 (3 from Oct, 1 from Nov, 1 from Dec)
Feb 03: 0
Feb 02: 0
Feb 01: 4 (1 from May, 3 from Oct)
Jan 31: 6 (3 from Sep, 3 from Oct)
Jan 30: 2 (2 from Oct)
Jan 29: 5 (5 from Oct)
Jan 28: 5 (1 from Sep, 4 from Oct)
Jan 27: 0
Jan 26: 0
Jan 25: 4 (1 from Jul, 2 from Sep, 1 from Oct)
Jan 24: 7 (2 from Aug, 3 from Sep, 2 from Oct)
Jan 23: 4 (3 from Jul, 1 from Oct)
97 total NOA2s in the last 30 days.
Virgil, that's great news! Congratulations!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please