No ones bitting?
Ok, I'll give it try... I guess in my point of view, it all boils down to the definition of love. Is it the passionate kind or the platonic kind? I believe that the western culture promotes passionate love over platonic love. It is more exciting, intense and is the subject of a lot of best selling books and blockbuster movies. But I noticed that in a lot of these books and movies, the story often focuses on the early stages of the relationship. The movies usually end in the wedding ceremony, with a promise of a Happily Ever After... So it seems to me that in the Western world, women (and men) are well trained for the stages that lead to the ceremony. This in itself is not a bad thing. Except for the fact that a marriage trully begin the day after the wedding. Thats when things start getting interresting... Perhaps it is because I live in the GREAT state of California, but I am absolutely amazed at the divorce rate in this country. 51%.
Higher in some states, like California...

The top reasons usually cited are money and "irreconcilable differences". To me, the latter is a fancy word for saying Real Life Kicked In. Too many times I have had to witness breakups, where someone's feelings had "changed". The individual did not "feel the same way as before", or my favorite "...I am no longer IN LOVE with my husband/wife..." By definition, feelings change. Personally, I don't ever remember feeling the exact same way about anything two days in a row, let alone two months or two years...
In my observation, the kind of love that is forever lasting has passion, but only as an ingredient, among many others. Matter of fact, I believe that this love cannot be the primary reason for a successful marriage. I don't think that the heart was created with a decision making function in mind.
I believe that a wiser decision making process begins with the brain, then the soul. The heart keeps beating, which is what it is meant to do