QUOTE(LaL @ Oct 27 2007, 11:32 AM)

QUOTE(Caladan @ Oct 27 2007, 10:44 AM)

Thinking about it more, might it not be good to change this in the timeline? Because I will not have an interview date, most likely, so we will not be adding anything to the Hartford timeline at all, rendering it less useful for other future Hartford filers.
I think it can be useful, we see at times members posting, "who at xyz local office has been transferred to CSC", etc. It might have nothing to do with the local office, but at least the full picture is there.
From a memo rebeccajo had it seems that the driving factor in being transferred is how backed up the local office is. (Hartford is still interviewing early 2007, so they say)
But even if there are other reasons, it would have been helpful to have that data included, because if I understand how the timelines work (perhaps questionable), if no interview date is entered, then the timeline doesn't count in terms of the aggregate data.
Which means that C.'s experience won't show up. Which isn't a big deal to him or me, but it means that anyone who searches Hartford is going to see the two or three people who waited for an interview.