QUOTE(flames9 @ Apr 18 2008, 02:55 PM)

few yrs back, wife badly sprained her ankle! Went to the ER. Sat there for like 3 hrs, finally got admitted. Saw the Dr for all of 2 minutes, had an xray to confirm nothing broken, and that was it!! Bil was close to $1500!. Luckily we have insurance. Since she had an xray, they did a pregnancy test, same one u buy at ur pharmacy for $20, they charged $60,lol Hospitals are not here to make ya better, there here to make $$$$
That really depends on the type of hospital you go to.
If you head to a private hospital, sure -- they want to make money, why wouldn't they? The only way they can stay in business is by charging patients. They get absolutely zero from the government. However, private hospitals generally have the latest-and-greatest in medical technology and
gain the best physicians, since these places are the nicest working environments to be in and offer the highest income potential (this, of course, differs by region).
State-run hospitals (
and we do have some of these, although they are of much lower quality, as is the case with government-run healthcare) are free to the public. But you can expect huge lines, tons of people (
most of whom would you could classify as "unsavory" characters, such as your homeless, drug users, drug pushers, pimps, hookers, and sometimes a dead person is even "dropped off" as well), including a general lack of overall supplies, room to house the patients, and the necessary staff (physicians, nurses, techs, etc) to deal with the high influx of patients. All in all, state-run hospitals are very much a nightmare. However, they don't cost upfront nor do you require health insurance (these are paid for by taxation), so if you are completely broke or
some wandering vagabond, these places might be your only bet.
I must disagree with your statements as being too broad and general and in some cases false. It might be different in Houston or DC but in many places in the US private hospitals as you have described do not exist but are of the co-pay variety. Many of the pure private hospitals you describe also get plenty of state and federal funding, frequently via fraud or other deceptive practices. Ask the Hospital Corporation of America (Sen. Bill Frist and family) who paid $1.8 billion dollars in fines or check with the GAO (Government Accounting Office). State-run and federal facilities (VA hospitals, etc.) aren't the only ones who operate using taxation, but at least they offer some representation and oversight. No taxation without representation, where have I heard that before? Government or private insurance plans cover at least a part of the bill for many patients. Is government-run healthcare better or worse than private plans. It depends on what the parameters of resource allocation are. To state that only the best doctors go to private hospitals is a vast generalization and specious at best and downright mendacious at worst. I would go to San Francisco General or Massachusetts General any day of the week. The US model is certainly different than the Canadian model with good and bad in each. There are many working poor or homeless that are hardly unsavoury, so your qualifier should have been worded slightly differently perhaps. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of dumps but still I always thought that hospitals were there to heal the sick, not to make money or cast aspersions on the clientele. Then again, what do I know?