Elgringo, while I empathize with what you've been saying--and I actually agree with your logic--but the below shows exactly what I was talking about. It's an extremely new law and your state has repeatedly (3 failed repeals) voted to keep it intact. If you're really against this law, you should be moving out of TN. Clearly the people of TN wants it this way. Despite what Doc says, I think many people in the US clearly lump legal and illegal immigration together. They want less immigration period, not just less illegal immigration.
I know this drives Doc crazy because anything he thinks is OK should be the law and anything he "thinks" is stupid should be repealed. Well that is his opinion. My opinion is that the requirement to carry a GC is clearly more stupid then this law and should be abolished.
While it may be annoying to carry both a CFD and a passport or GC, your wife has a valid permit to drive and she has legal proof of ID in the form of passport and GC, so once again I don't see the need for this big fuss. The practical goal is achieved--which is for her to drive.
QUOTE(elgringo @ Aug 9 2007, 08:37 PM)

Just found this. Apparently TN is the first state to have passed this stupid CFD law crap. And also I found where they introduced no less than 3 different laws to repeal the CFD law this legislative session, but all 3 failed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, July 29, 2004
Nation watches implications of Tennessee driver certificate
"'This is a disaster, potentially,' said Tyler Moran, an analyst with the National Immigration Law Center, which advocates for the rights of immigrants. 'I really think it's created a bit of a mess.'"
"For once, Moran is in agreement with state Rep. Donna Rowland, a conservative Republican from Rutherford County. Rowland said she would 'absolutely not' advise other states to follow Tennessee's lead."
"'I hope states learn from our mistakes,' she said. '
The certificate of driving will become exactly what the driver's license has become, which is a de facto national ID.'"
"Tennessee's experiment is being scrutinized by numerous states trying to balance road safety against federal immigration policy and homeland security."
If the CFD becomes a de facto national ID, isn't that what you want?

I don't understand this quote. What exactly are they arguing for?